-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
On 6/7/2009 7:17 PM, Jason Joseph wrote:
>
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Be careful to secure access to WEB-INF and META-INF.
> Yup, Ive got this in there, one for META-INF too...
>
>
>deny from all
>
I highly recom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 6/7/2009 3:41 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Jason Joseph wrote:
> ...
>
>> Yes all static files are being served by Apache. No they aren't being
>> loaded from the document root they are actually being loaded from
>> within our application war
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
On 6/5/2009 5:34 PM, Jason Joseph wrote:
> I think I have figured it out though, I just realized
> I have mod_deflate enabled for Apache.
That was my suspicion, but I wanted to see how the other issues played-out.
> Would that apply to data c
Rainer Jung wrote:
Be careful to secure access to WEB-INF and META-INF.
Yup, Ive got this in there, one for META-INF too...
deny from all
Thanks...
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On 07.06.2009 18:46, Jason Joseph wrote:
The previously send log files show, that those .png requests are not
forwarded to Tomcat. So what is actually answering them? Apache web
server directly? Did you put them into the DocumentRoot? That should be
much faster, than what you see.
Andre - Web
> From: Jason Joseph [mailto:jjos...@keystreams.com]
> Subject: Re: concurrent connections with mod_jk/apache/tomcat
>
> Alias /WebApp_ID/
> "/etc/local/WebSphere/repository/default/MyOwnBriefcase-
> 0.0.1/1244286355278/MyOwnBriefcase-0.0.1-12.war/
That's a directory
The previously send log files show, that those .png requests are not
forwarded to Tomcat. So what is actually answering them? Apache web
server directly? Did you put them into the DocumentRoot? That should be
much faster, than what you see.
Andre - Websphere has a component which helps you s
Jason Joseph wrote:
...
Yes all static files are being served by Apache. No they aren't being
loaded from the document root they are actually being loaded from within
our application war.
That I do not understand. It seems contradictory.
Or, to put it another way, how do you manage that ?
--
Rainer Jung wrote:
The difference is obviously how the bunch of pictures is handled, that
were retrieved close to the end. Those images - I suppose - are static
content. They are very small. So needing 2 seconds to serve such an
image is much to long.
The previously send log files show, th
On 06.06.2009 02:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 06.06.2009 01:35, Jason Joseph wrote:
>> Rainer Jung wrote:
JkOptions +FlushHeader +FlushPackets
>>> in order to make the flush also effective for httpd.
>>>
>>>
>> Just realized I didn't disable caching before I did that last test,
>>
On 06.06.2009 01:35, Jason Joseph wrote:
>
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> JkOptions +FlushHeader +FlushPackets
>>>
>>
>> in order to make the flush also effective for httpd.
>>
>>
> Just realized I didn't disable caching before I did that last test,
> heres the image with caching disabled.
>
>
On 05.06.2009 23:34, Jason Joseph wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 05.06.2009 22:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>>> Chuck,
>>>
>>> On 6/5/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>
>>>>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...
So it seems I put my foot (feet ?) in my mouth about the single browser
connection.
The rest of what I wrote is generally true though, just consider two
connnections instead of one then (per window I suppose, although I'm not
sure of that either).
Rainer Jung wrote:
JkOptions +FlushHeader +FlushPackets
in order to make the flush also effective for httpd.
Just realized I didn't disable caching before I did that last test,
heres the image with caching disabled.
http://207.7.102.90/~thecorp/apache-ajp-withflush-nocache.jpg
Its
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 05.06.2009 22:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Chuck,
On 6/5/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: concurrent
connections with mod_jk/apache/tomcat
The only time when a browser would fire off
On 05.06.2009 22:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> On 6/5/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: concurrent
>>> connections with mod_jk/apache/tomcat
>>>
>>> The only tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I just noticed something else: the two firebug examples provided in the
OP have wildly differing primary response sizes: the direct-to-Tomcat
one has a 16KiB response while the via-httpd response is a mere 4KiB.
Jason, can you provide two sample
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 6/5/2009 1:17 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: concurrent
>> connections with mod_jk/apache/tomcat
>>
>> The only time when a browser would fire off &qu
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: concurrent connections with mod_jk/apache/tomcat
>
> The only time when a browser would fire off "simultaneous"
> requests, is if there were several windows or frames open,
> each making its own connecti
Jason Joseph wrote:
Christopher Schultz wrote:
.. lots of things ..
I can't imagine that MaxRequestsPerChild would contribute to this
problem. Maybe if you had MaxRequestPerChild set to 1 I might believe
it, but you have it set to "0" which means "children never die".
Wouldn't MaxRequestPer
> From: Jason Joseph [mailto:jjos...@keystreams.com]
> Subject: Re: Re: concurrent connections with mod_jk/apache/tomcat
>
> after reading things online I thought the best practice for production
> environments was for tomcat to handle dynamic requests and apache to
> handle sta
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
On 6/4/2009 5:06 PM, Jason Joseph wrote:
I am currently in development of an app which we are testing through
tomcat6 (websphere specifically). Now that we are moving to production
we wanted to use apache (Apach
> From: Jason Joseph [mailto:jjos...@keystreams.com]
> Subject: concurrent connections with mod_jk/apache/tomcat
>
> I am currently in development of an app which we are testing through
> tomcat6 (websphere specifically).
Which is it - Tomcat or WebSphere?
> we wanted to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
On 6/4/2009 5:06 PM, Jason Joseph wrote:
> I am currently in development of an app which we are testing through
> tomcat6 (websphere specifically). Now that we are moving to production
> we wanted to use apache (Apache 2.2.8) to serve up static
First time posting on the tomcat list so bear with me if this doesn't
make any sense :)
I am currently in development of an app which we are testing through
tomcat6 (websphere specifically). Now that we are moving to production
we wanted to use apache (Apache 2.2.8) to serve up static content
25 matches
Mail list logo
