L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:18 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Which is better Option
>
>
> jms - JMS can live in the same JVM or be moved to a new JVM without
> changing
> any servlet code. (Only some config changes)
>
>
> -Tim
>
&
VM ]
>
>
>
> with regards
>Karthik
>
>-Original Message-
> From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:18 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: Which is better Option
>
>
>jms - JMS can live in the same JVM or be mov
Users List
Subject: Re: Which is better Option
jms - JMS can live in the same JVM or be moved to a new JVM without changing
any servlet code. (Only some config changes)
-Tim
Karthik wrote:
> Hi Form
>
> Please somebody specify
>
> Which Option [ advantages /limitations ] is Be
List
Subject: Re: Which is better Option
jms - JMS can live in the same JVM or be moved to a new JVM without changing
any servlet code. (Only some config changes)
-Tim
Karthik wrote:
> Hi Form
>
> Please somebody specify
>
> Which Option [ advantages /limitations ] is Be
You cannot define by these parameters which should be the best, because you
need to consider lot of other factors as well. But with the given information
by you this is what my opinion would be: -
1. Using a servlet would be a request/response mechanism and you make user wait
for response. As y
jms - JMS can live in the same JVM or be moved to a new JVM without changing
any servlet code. (Only some config changes)
-Tim
Karthik wrote:
Hi Form
Please somebody specify
Which Option [ advantages /limitations ] is Better ?
1) Using a Servlet to created a seperate Thread for proce
Hi Form
Please somebody specify
Which Option [ advantages /limitations ] is Better ?
1) Using a Servlet to created a seperate Thread for processing a Bulk DB
Task [ Off the limits of session time]
2) Using JMS to handle the Bulk DB Task.
with regards
Karthik
--
