On Tuesday 17 March 2009 15:23:03 André Warnier wrote:
> +1 (confirming what Rainer says above).
[...]
> I also do not really see the interest in running a separate Tomcat on
> the physical Linux server, since one can easily define a Virtual host
> and run a Tomcat in there.
To avoid misunderst
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 15:44:19 Alan Chaney wrote:
> >> What do you mean with "the other end"? I use VMWare Server 2 on Ubuntu
> >> (original tar.gz install from vmware.com), also found that it blocks the
> >> said ports, and simply changed the server.xml of the VMWare Tomcat.
>
> And how did the
Chris
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 3/17/2009 4:18 AM, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 22:42:27 Christopher Schultz wrote:
Can you clarify this a bit?
There is no special management instance. VMWare Server is an
Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 14:46:35 Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer,
There is no special management instance. VMWare Server is an application
that runs on a regular host operating system instance (it installs linux
kernel modules though, and probably also Wind
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 14:46:35 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Rainer,
>
> > There is no special management instance. VMWare Server is an application
> > that runs on a regular host operating system instance (it installs linux
> > kernel modules though, and probably also Windows drivers).
>
> Inter
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> On 3/17/2009 4:18 AM, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
> > On Monday 16 March 2009 22:42:27 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you clarify this a bit?
> >
> > There is no special management instance. VMWare Server is
> an ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 3/17/2009 4:18 AM, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
> On Monday 16 March 2009 22:42:27 Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>> Can you clarify this a bit?
>
> There is no special management instance. VMWare Server is an application that
> runs
On Monday 16 March 2009 22:42:27 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > I spent some time looking to see whether these were configurable, but I
> > found nothing, apart from a rather snotty message on the vmware bulletin
> > boards stating that they didn't think that you should run a server on
> > the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan,
On 3/16/2009 4:09 PM, Alan Chaney wrote:
> I spent some time looking to see whether these were configurable, but I
> found nothing, apart from a rather snotty message on the vmware bulletin
> boards stating that they didn't think that you should
I've just wasted about a couple of hours sorting out an issue with
Vmware server 2 and tomcat and I thought I'd pass it along, hoping to
save someone else a small piece of frustration.
I've been setting up a new development workstation (CentOS 5.2) and
switched to using vmware server 2 (becaus
10 matches
Mail list logo
