8, 2007 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: no UserTransaction in jndi
>
> Hello,
>
> under 5.5.9 the configuration has to be
> name="UserTransaction"
> type="com.atomikos.icatch.jta.UserTransactionImp"
> factory="org.apache.naming.factory.Bea
Hello,
under 5.5.9 the configuration has to be
With this, the 5.5.9 manager lists the UserTransaction. But I want to use a
actual version of tomcat.
Should the manager list the UserTransaction if it is configured under 5.5.25
or 6.0.14 with
?
regards,
Peter
--
View this message in context
ly one tomcat running. No own webapp deployed or
ejb server running. I plan to use XA-transactions with Atomikos
transactions. Therefore I need a UserTransaction provided per jndi. This is
what I'm testing, but I have problems on the first setup.
regards,
Peter
--
View this message in conte
gs about this at Tomcat startup?
>
You'r right, so I tried
But there is no change in the result:
- "http://localhost:8080/manager/resources"; lists only the UserDatabase
- lambdaprobe says that the resource-ref to UserTransaction is not working
manager.log:
08.11.2007 10:07:16 or
>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: no UserTransaction in jndi
> From: Peter Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: no UserTransaction in jndi
>
> For this I added to the in the server.xml
> factory="
> From: Peter Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: no UserTransaction in jndi
>
> For this I added to the in the server.xml
> factory="com.atomikos.icatch.jta.UserTransactionFactory"
> />
According to the Tomcat doc, the only valid attribute is fac
Hello,
I try to configure a tomcat 6.0.14 to provide a
javax.transaction.UserTransaction in jndi "java:comp/UserTransaction".
For this I added to the in the server.xml
and
to the global .
I put the needed jars into the folder "$catalina_home$/lib".
Listing all jndi-
Hi All,
I'm currently trying to create a transaction between a standalone
application and a web service. By starting a usertransaction in
the standalone app and bridging it to/with the web service.
However I'm unable to get use a transaction in the web service.
I took these steps:
- p
I am able to work with JOTM when I run tomcat stand alone, but when I run it
from maven (embedded), UserTransaction doesn't get bind in the context
resulting in following error.
javax.naming.NamingException: Cannot create resource instan
t make it create the java:comp/UserTransaction name
in the initial context.
The code I am using is:
return (UserTransaction)new
javax.naming.InitialContext().lookup("java:comp/UserTransaction");
Thanks for any help...
Ignacio
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.c
I don't have that enabled. Isn't it by default set to true?
Here is my context element.
-Original Message-
From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 5:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: java:comp/UserTransaction NameNotFoundException Tomcat
5.0.28
> Subject: Re: java:comp/UserTransaction NameNotFoundException Tomcat
> 5.0.28
>
>
> sorry, I meant, "java:comp/env/UserTransaction"
>
> --
> Vivek.
>
> On 7/24/06, Vivek Mohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> try using java:comp/env.UserTransac
Thanks, but got the same exception.
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Mohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 4:16 PM
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: java:comp/UserTransaction NameNotFoundException Tomcat
5.0.28
sorry, I meant, "java:com
sorry, I meant, "java:comp/env/UserTransaction"
--
Vivek.
On 7/24/06, Vivek Mohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
try using java:comp/env.UserTransaction for JNDI lookup.
--
Vivek.
On 7/24/06, Seetha Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi I'm using JOTM for transaction
t-jotm.html The JNDI
look up throws the following exception:
Here is the code:
Context ctx = new InitialContext();
UserTransaction userTx =
(UserTransaction)ctx.lookup("java:comp/UserTransaction");
The Entry in the mywebapp.xml file:
factory
org.objectweb.jotm.U
Hi I'm using JOTM for transaction management with Tomcat 5.0.28. I have all
the required jar files as given in
http://jotm.objectweb.org/current/jotm/doc/howto-tomcat-jotm.html The JNDI
look up throws the following exception:
Here is the code:
Context ctx = new InitialContext();
UserTransa
fine after
that.
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/UserTransaction%2C-JOTM-and-Tomcat-5.5.x-t1073172.html#a3891129
Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
On 2/11/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to follow up on this, the settings below work - but HSQLDB
> doesn't seem to support nested transactions.
>
> <<< beginning the transaction >>>
> DBTest >> javax.transaction.NotSupportedException: Nested transactions not
> suppo
> rted
>
Just to follow up on this, the settings below work - but HSQLDB
doesn't seem to support nested transactions.
<<< beginning the transaction >>>
DBTest >> javax.transaction.NotSupportedException: Nested transactions not suppo
rted
at org.objectweb.jotm.Current.begin(Current.java:233)
Since you're doing docs, META-INF/context.xml should be simplified to:
No servlet class reloading anymore (not useful to many people), and
the Transaction element has all the necessary defaults since it's a
special resource.
--
x
Rémy Maucherat
Developer & C
On 2/8/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. It's not useful to anyone (well, almost) either.
>
> Just curious - what do you mean? Are you saying that no one uses a
> JTA TransactionManager with Tomcat? Is it something you don't
> recommend? My guess is it's better to use a server li
On 2/7/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Remy - this is good stuff, I didn't know about the
> > element. Is that new in 5.5.x? Is it documented
> > anywhere?
>
> No. It's not useful to anyone (well, almost) either.
Just
On 2/7/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Remy - this is good stuff, I didn't know about the
> element. Is that new in 5.5.x? Is it documented
> anywhere?
No. It's not useful to anyone (well, almost) either.
> As far as the JARs location - this shouldn't matter should it? I c
On 2/7/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For 1), it's simple: Resources are bound in "comp/env", while the
> > UserTransaction should go in "comp". ResourceLink has a speci
On 2/7/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For 1), it's simple: Resources are bound in "comp/env", while the
> UserTransaction should go in "comp". ResourceLink has a special case
> for UserTransaction, so it works. There's a special Transac
t;
> I've updated the following tutorial for Tomcat 5.5.x:
>
> http://jotm.objectweb.org/current/jotm/doc/howto-tomcat-jotm.html
>
> My update: http://static.raibledesigns.com/downloads/howto-tomcat-jotm.html
> To summarize:
>
> Why can't a UserTransaction re
longer possible to put a for UserTransaction in
context.xml. Why is that? It works fine in Tomcat 5.0.x.
For 5.5.x, it seems you have to put the UserTransaction resource in
the part of server.xml.
Then you have to link to it from your context.xml:
2. For the demo (dbtest.war) li
27 matches
Mail list logo
