Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread André Warnier
Mark Eggers wrote: - Original Message - From: André Warnier To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 2:26 PM Subject: Re: URI mapping Pid wrote: ... The jsessionid cookie is set with the server name of the Tomcat instance, rather than a domain with variable

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message - > From: André Warnier > To: Tomcat Users List > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 2:26 PM > Subject: Re: URI mapping > > Pid wrote: > ... > The jsessionid cookie is set with the server >> name of the Tomcat instance, r

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread André Warnier
Pid wrote: ... The jsessionid cookie is set with the server name of the Tomcat instance, rather than a domain with variable subdomains*, unless you have configured it otherwise (Servlet 3.0 only). Yes, but what /is/ this server name that this Tomcat will be using ? I don't think that is as str

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread André Warnier
Mark Eggers wrote: - Original Message - From: André Warnier To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:08 AM Subject: Re: URI mapping Let's restart from the beginning. You have, say, 3 Tomcat servers running, and for the sake of the example let's say

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Pid
On 23/10/2011 20:51, Mark Eggers wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: André Warnier >> To: Tomcat Users List >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:08 AM >> Subject: Re: URI mapping >> >> Let's restart from the beginning. &

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message - > From: André Warnier > To: Tomcat Users List > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:08 AM > Subject: Re: URI mapping > > Let's restart from the beginning. > > You have, say, 3 Tomcat servers running, and for the sake of the exa

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread André Warnier
Let's restart from the beginning. You have, say, 3 Tomcat servers running, and for the sake of the example let's say that these are - a Tomcat 5.x server - a Tomcat 6.x server - a Tomcat 7.x server You want to run the same applications on all of them (with identical names on each server), bec

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Rainer Jung
On 22.10.2011 18:42, Eldon Olmstead wrote: > Thanks for the response Mark, > > Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at > work ), then if I understand right, I have no choice but to make tomcat > support /tomcat7/ in the path. Do I do this just by moving all the > web

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Pid
On 22/10/2011 23:37, Eldon Olmstead wrote: > > > On 2011-10-22 5:57 PM, Pid wrote: >> On 22/10/2011 17:42, Eldon Olmstead wrote: >>> Thanks for the response Mark, >>> >>> Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at >>> work ), then if I understand right, I have no choic

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Eldon Olmstead
On 2011-10-22 5:57 PM, Pid wrote: On 22/10/2011 17:42, Eldon Olmstead wrote: Thanks for the response Mark, Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at work ), then if I understand right, I have no choice but to make tomcat support /tomcat7/ in the path. Do I do this

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Pid
On 22/10/2011 17:42, Eldon Olmstead wrote: > Thanks for the response Mark, > > Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at > work ), then if I understand right, I have no choice but to make tomcat > support /tomcat7/ in the path. Do I do this just by moving all the > web

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread André Warnier
Hi. What response ? to what question ? Top-posting makes it difficult to follow the flow of questions/answers. Mark's response was at the bottom, where it was logically following the part of the question he was answering. Once it has started that way, it is a lot easier for everyone to contin

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Tobias Crefeld
Am Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:17:26 +0100 schrieb Mark Thomas : > ProxyPass /tomcat7 http://localhost:8080 > or > ProxyPass /tomcat7 ajp://localhost:8080 Usually Tomcat is listening for ajp-requests on port 8009, not 8080. Regards, Tobias. -

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Eldon Olmstead
Thanks for the response Mark, Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at work ), then if I understand right, I have no choice but to make tomcat support /tomcat7/ in the path. Do I do this just by moving all the webapps under webapps/tomcat7/? Will I have to make ot

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/10/2011 17:11, Eldon Olmstead wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using the following > Apache2.2 > mod_jk 1.2.32 > Tomcat 7.0.21 > > I am trying to understand how to configure Apache to allow access to > Tomcat via mod_jk. I have already made some progress, but have got stuck > on one point. > > Curr

URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Eldon Olmstead
Hello, I'm using the following Apache2.2 mod_jk 1.2.32 Tomcat 7.0.21 I am trying to understand how to configure Apache to allow access to Tomcat via mod_jk. I have already made some progress, but have got stuck on one point. Currently, I can access Apache at http://localhost ( works ) I can

Re: IIS + Tomcat jk2 uri mapping

2006-12-08 Thread Rainer Jung
o be accessed as www.mydomain.com/stats/awstats.pl > > We have a problem in the mapping in jk2 workers properties uri mapping. > As www.mydomain.com needs to default index.jsp, it has to be included in > the mapping for Tomcat to process the request (as in > [uri:www.mydomain.com/*]).

IIS + Tomcat jk2 uri mapping

2006-12-08 Thread Low Kwok Leong
IIS called stats, to be accessed as www.mydomain.com/stats/awstats.pl We have a problem in the mapping in jk2 workers properties uri mapping. As www.mydomain.com needs to default index.jsp, it has to be included in the mapping for Tomcat to process the request (as in [uri:www.mydomain.com