Mark and Jerry,
On 5/1/24 04:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/04/2024 21:24, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I'm trying to optimize my instance, CPU, tuning, and size requirements
for Tomcat. It's easy to see CPU usage. But this TC instance is
running a lot of microservices that are often in and out fairly
On 30/04/2024 21:24, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I'm trying to optimize my instance, CPU, tuning, and size requirements
for Tomcat. It's easy to see CPU usage. But this TC instance is
running a lot of microservices that are often in and out fairly
quickly. So there can be a huge number of requests
I'm trying to optimize my instance, CPU, tuning, and size requirements
for Tomcat. It's easy to see CPU usage. But this TC instance is
running a lot of microservices that are often in and out fairly
quickly. So there can be a huge number of requests coming in. I'm not
sure that CPU starving
Lance,
On 1/13/22 11:16, Campbell, Lance wrote:
For Tomcat 9.x is there a particular website you have found to be helpful for
performance tuning Tomcat 9?
Tomcat performs pretty well in its default configuration.
Do you have a particular problem you are trying to investigate or solve,
or
e a particular website you have found to be helpful
> for performance tuning Tomcat 9?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lance
>
--
Thanks,
Brian Wolfe
https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-wolfe-3136425a/
For Tomcat 9.x is there a particular website you have found to be helpful for
performance tuning Tomcat 9?
Thanks,
Lance
On 24/02/2011 06:42, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I setup a simple servlet with no code in the doGet() method running in Tomcat
> 7.0.8 and using jvm 1.6.22 and using httpclient from apache commons lib and I
> am
> lucky to get 2.8msec per request as measured at the client. I am thinking
: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 11:45:29 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 12/02/2011 18:27, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Right now for most of my transactions I get less than 5 microseconds and
> around
>
> 1.2msec is spent on getting to and out of Tomcat and out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 2/15/2011 2:43 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 2/15/11 2:34 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Pid,
>>
>> On 2/14/2011 5:39 AM, Pid wrote:
>>> On 2/13/11 8:15 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi Mark,
Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to sen
On 2/15/11 2:34 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 2/14/2011 5:39 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 2/13/11 8:15 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to send as an attachement.
>>>
>>> http://www.myuniportal.com/tomcatjerseyservletprofile.jpg
>
>> W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 2/14/2011 5:39 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 2/13/11 8:15 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to send as an attachement.
>>
>> http://www.myuniportal.com/tomcatjerseyservletprofile.jpg
>
> What are we lo
- Original Message
From: Pid
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 3:39:04 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 2/13/11 8:15 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to send as an attachement.
mas
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Sent: Sun, February 13, 2011 2:54:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
>
> On 13/02/2011 04:33, Tony Anecito wrote:
>> Thanks Pid.
>>
>> Odd though I did a GET with no attachments.
>> I do return a complex object but
s
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sun, February 13, 2011 2:54:53 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 13/02/2011 04:33, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Thanks Pid.
>
> Odd though I did a GET with no attachments.
> I do return a complex object but that is only the response not the request
: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 13/02/2011 04:33, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Thanks Pid.
>
> Odd though I did a GET with no attachments.
> I do return a complex object but that is only the response not the request.
Pid meant that the mailing list strips attachments. We can't
ferring to.
Mark
>
> -Tony
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Pid
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 5:04:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
>
> On 2/12/11 10:23 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>> I attached th
Thanks Pid.
Odd though I did a GET with no attachments.
I do return a complex object but that is only the response not the request.
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Pid
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 5:04:41 PM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 2/12
On 2/12/11 10:23 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> I attached the screenshot of visualvm showing what I mean.
The list strips attachments...
p
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
short-circuit some of these calls.
I attached the screenshot of visualvm showing what I mean.
Thanks,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 11:45:29 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 12/02/2011 18:27, Tony
Thanks the numbers help to give me an idea what might be possible. I do have
visualvm 1.3.1 and I will try that.
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 11:45:29 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 12/02/2011 18
On 12/02/2011 18:27, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Right now for most of my transactions I get less than 5 microseconds and
> around
> 1.2msec is spent on getting to and out of Tomcat and out of to/out of the
> client
> call.
>
> So people were saying look at better parsers or replacing whatever does
hput..
D
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 11:18:18 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 12/02/2011 18:14, Tony Anecito wrote:
Is there any performance tuning that can be done to Tomcat 7 beside
the method is where I should focus.
The network goes over a 1Gb ethernet lan.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 11:18:18 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 12/02/2011 18:14, Tony Anecito wrote:
>
On 12/02/2011 18:14, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Is there any performance tuning that can be done to Tomcat 7 besides just the
> standard jvm arguments?
95%+ of tuning will need to be done in the app rather than Tomcat. My
recommendation is to get yourself a profiler and go from there.
Mark
---
Is there any performance tuning that can be done to Tomcat 7 besides just the
standard jvm arguments?
Regards,
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h
Sergey Livanov:
> Help me to adjust JVM, please. My configuration - win2k server, Tomcat5.5.9
I hope you follow Chuck's good advice and re-describe your problem in a
way others can understand.
Moreover, if you're interested in tuning, you could start by downloading
a Tomcat version that is not a
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Tuning Tomcat
>
> >> Free memory: 1.64 MB Total memory: 5.44 MB Max memory: 63.56 MB
>
> I like this post, because the system parameters remind me of Chuck's
> portable phone, and my development system.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Sergey Livanov [mailto:sergey.liva...@gmail.com]
Subject: Tuning Tomcat
Help me to adjust JVM, please. My configuration - win2k
server, Tomcat5.5.9
system vars - JAVA_HOME=c:\jre153, CATALINA_HOME=c:\tomcat
catalina.bat - set CATALINA_OPTS="-server -Xm
> From: Sergey Livanov [mailto:sergey.liva...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Tuning Tomcat
>
> Help me to adjust JVM, please. My configuration - win2k
> server, Tomcat5.5.9
> system vars - JAVA_HOME=c:\jre153, CATALINA_HOME=c:\tomcat
> catalina.bat - set CATALINA_OPTS="-server
Help me to adjust JVM, please. My configuration - win2k server, Tomcat5.5.9
system vars - JAVA_HOME=c:\jre153, CATALINA_HOME=c:\tomcat
catalina.bat - set CATALINA_OPTS="-server -Xms256M -Xmx512M"
After start
Free memory: 1.64 MB Total memory: 5.44 MB Max memory: 63.56 MB
TIA .
---
I have a tuning question for Tomcat 55 under Open VMS: should Java and
tomcat be installed on a system device or with other user applications?
Thank you,
Alex
Alex Chelminsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
781-290-1620 (office)
617-650-5453 (cell)
781-890-1208 (fax)
CSC Consulting, Inc.
Registered Office:
Hi Folks
Past couple of months i was working to make tomcat perform with a "push"
application. I have posted the results of our effort @
http://rjha94.blogspot.com/
I would welcome your comments and suggestions
Thanks
- Rajeev.
-
Hi List,
I have a specific question about apache _expression matching.
I have a apache tomcat server setup . While tuning tomcat i needed to
achieve some tweaking to the apache _expression matching , or atleast that i
felt .
The site have all incoming urls (www.subdomain.domain.com type) are
d fix what seems the slowest.
George Sexton
MH Software, Inc.
http://www.mhsoftware.com/
Voice: 303 438 9585
> -Original Message-
> From: Legolas Woodland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 4:26 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tuning Tomcat
Thank you for reply.
George Sexton wrote:
Database interaction is by far the major issue. In my application, a page
with no db interaction runs in something like 80ms, while a page with DB
interaction takes something like 350-400ms. There's no silver bullet to
tuning tomcat applications
0 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Tuning Tomcat , i need some advice
>
> 80ms was with the server saturated and running 100% CPU
> utilization. Min
> times were in the 10ms range, with the more db intensive
> pages having min
> times in the 60ms ran
Hi,
Don't find the results at the provided URL.
-sunitha
-Original Message-
From: George Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 2:50 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tuning Tomcat , i need some advice
80ms was with the server saturated
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 3:18 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tuning Tomcat , i need some advice
>
> On 1/30/06, George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Database interaction is by far the major issue. In my
> application, a page
> > with no
> interaction takes something like 350-400ms. There's no silver bullet to
> > tuning tomcat applications, and most of the advice you'll get here won't
> > make any difference (use this connector, instead of that). So, my advice is:
>
> Hmm, 80 ms per page is ext
On 1/30/06, George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Database interaction is by far the major issue. In my application, a page
> with no db interaction runs in something like 80ms, while a page with DB
> interaction takes something like 350-400ms. There's no silver bulle
> From: Legolas Woodland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Tuning Tomcat , i need some advice
>
> Where i can find more reference and how to(s) or step by step
> manual to tune tomcat.
I'd suggest starting with Peter Lin's paper:
http://tomcat.apache.org/articles/p
ile a page with DB
interaction takes something like 350-400ms. There's no silver bullet to
tuning tomcat applications, and most of the advice you'll get here won't
make any difference (use this connector, instead of that). So, my advice is:
1) Using JDK 1.5. It can be up to 25% f
Database interaction is by far the major issue. In my application, a page
with no db interaction runs in something like 80ms, while a page with DB
interaction takes something like 350-400ms. There's no silver bullet to
tuning tomcat applications, and most of the advice you'll get here
Hi
Thank you for reading my post.
I have an application which will handle about 30 hit per second with
Tomcat 5.5.* (* wil be one of 15 or 12)
Now i need some advice about tuning tomcat to perform the best under
this condition
I read something so far , things like :
use Java server mode
44 matches
Mail list logo
