> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat relative path
>
> See these resources for an interesting read:
> http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/05/12/sharding-dominant-domains/
Yes, it was the sharding one that the OP was trying t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/28/2009 9:25 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: tcwarrior [mailto:sr_s...@yahoo.com]
>> Subject: Tomcat relative path
>>
>> We had a consultant tell us since we have 49 images
>> loading on our hom
> From: tcwarrior [mailto:sr_s...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat relative path
>
> Isn't it 2 per domain?
Maybe; I didn't realize your intent was to have a separate domain for each
image. If the client keeps track of connections by domain name, then putting
pairs
g
some of them and use image maps which should reduce time to load.
[There are crazier alternatives - but they would be maintenance nightmares.]
-Tim
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: tcwarrior [mailto:sr_s...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Tomcat relative path
Our tomcat servers are front ended by a
x. have .gif's go to subdomain1 and
.jpg's to subdomain2?
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: tcwarrior [mailto:sr_s...@yahoo.com]
>> Subject: Tomcat relative path
>>
>> Our tomcat servers are front ended by apache. The apache servers
>> do serve th
> From: tcwarrior [mailto:sr_s...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Tomcat relative path
>
> Our tomcat servers are front ended by apache. The apache servers
> do serve the static content. The img source is something like
> /imagedir/pic.jpg which tomcat controls.
Not quite sure what you
magedir/pic.jpg?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-relative-path-tp23772234p23772234.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
