Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-10 Thread Mark Thomas
On 05/01/2011 17:02, EOIN MCQUILLAN wrote: > Mark I'm not sure I fully agree with your last answers. The purpose, to me, > would be to extend the capabilities of chunked transfer encoding rather than > to > implement chunked transfer encoding. They are optional after all. Being > optional > th

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread André Warnier
EOIN MCQUILLAN wrote: Mark I'm not sure I fully agree with your last answers. The purpose, to me, would be to extend the capabilities of chunked transfer encoding rather than to implement chunked transfer encoding. They are optional after all. Being optional then I would view them moe as a feat

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread EOIN MCQUILLAN
n but this is merely wording so I am splitting hairs here. I appreciate the time you've taken to reply on this. Thanks Eoin From: Mark Thomas To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Wednesday, 5 January, 2011 16:39:31 Subject: Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread Mark Thomas
of chunked transfer encoding. Mark > > > > > > From: Mark Thomas > To: Tomcat Users List > Sent: Wednesday, 5 January, 2011 14:58:55 > Subject: Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions > > On 05/01/2011 14:52, EOIN MCQUILLAN wro

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread EOIN MCQUILLAN
the extensions look like a useful feature anyway so I'd be interested in knowing your opinion on them. From: Mark Thomas To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Wednesday, 5 January, 2011 14:58:55 Subject: Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions On 05/01/2011 14:52,

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread Mark Thomas
On 05/01/2011 14:52, EOIN MCQUILLAN wrote: > Mark - maybe I am pushing the boundaries with what I am doing here however > given > the HTTP RFC provides us with a chunk extension capability then I would have > assumed there would exist an set of API calls within Tomcat that allow us to > read/wr

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread EOIN MCQUILLAN
? From: Mark Thomas To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Wednesday, 5 January, 2011 14:32:56 Subject: Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions On 05/01/2011 14:29, EOIN MCQUILLAN wrote: > Thanks for the reply André. > > I am taking my terminology from RFC 2616 so "chunk-extension&

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread Mark Thomas
On 05/01/2011 14:29, EOIN MCQUILLAN wrote: > Thanks for the reply André. > > I am taking my terminology from RFC 2616 so "chunk-extension" should be the > right terminology I think. > > I don't think multiparting would be the way to go in this case. Really with > the > chunking extensions the

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread EOIN MCQUILLAN
al = token | quoted-string chunk-data = chunk-size(OCTET) trailer= *(entity-header CRLF) From: André Warnier To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Wednesday, 5 January, 2011 14:16:08 Subject: Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions EOIN MCQUILLAN w

Re: Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread André Warnier
EOIN MCQUILLAN wrote: Hi, I'm looking at extending a web application we have so as HTTP POSTs sent to it will contain information in the form of chunk extensions. In addition on reply to these POST requests I would like to write a chunk extension back to the caller. Is there anything

Tomcat and HTTP chunk extensions

2011-01-05 Thread EOIN MCQUILLAN
Hi, I'm looking at extending a web application we have so as HTTP POSTs sent to it will contain information in the form of chunk extensions. In addition on reply to these POST requests I would like to write a chunk extension back to the caller. Is there anything in the API which would