The 64.225.156.250 is the IP address that apache httpd and tomcat are
running on. To me it looks as if there is a 'default' host that those
'GET /' requests are being handled by. I assume
that VHost is the virtual host within tomcat that actually handled the
request, based on the definitio
On 06.03.2009 21:02, Ian Long wrote:
I have fixed the problem by stopping the https ping so that these stuck
processes don't happen, but am digging into the problem a bit further.
I think you are right that it's apache waiting for tomcat to send data
back for the request, because if I look at th
I have fixed the problem by stopping the https ping so that these
stuck processes don't happen, but am digging into the problem a bit
further.
I think you are right that it's apache waiting for tomcat to send data
back for the request, because if I look at the tomcat manager
application,
omcat and Apache with mod_jk
Here is some sample output from the system-status:
Srv PID Acc M CPU SS Req ConnChild
SlotClient VHost Request
0-0 20960/50/50 _ 0.0123 2 0.0 0.09
0.09X web1.opterus.com
I just took a subset of the list, the other few hundred processes were
also stuck in the same state. From the tomcat logs it looks like the
response has been sent back. I have seen cases where a firewall
doesn't recognize a connection has been closed.
On 5-Mar-09, at 7:05 PM, Rainer Jung
On 06.03.2009 00:44, Ian Long wrote:
Here is some sample output from the system-status:
Srv PID Acc M CPU SS Req Conn Child Slot Client VHost Request
0-0 2096 0/50/50 _ 0.01 23 2 0.0 0.09 0.09 X web1.opterus.com GET
/lbcheck.faces HTTP/1.0
1-0 2097 0/12/12 W 0.01 513 0 0.0 0.05 0.05 X web1.opter
Here is some sample output from the system-status:
Srv PID Acc M CPU SS Req ConnChild Slot
Client VHost Request
0-0 2096 0/50/50 _ 0.01 23 2 0.0 0.09 0.09 X web1.opterus.com GET /
lbcheck.faces HTTP/1.0
1-0 2097 0/12/12 W 0.01 513 0 0.0 0.05 0.05 X
stion of setting the
> cache-control headers to max-age=0 does not work.
>
>
>
-
Buzzterrier
http://buzzterrier.blogspot.com/ View my blog: Ordinary Average Developer...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-and-Apache-with-mod_jk-tp22356983p22361683.html
On 05.03.2009 21:04, Ian Long wrote:
I haven't actually - I will turn it on and restart the server tonight.
Another thing that I find strange is the apache (using prefork MPM)
seems to keep increasing the number of child processes. For example,
when I run:
service httpd status
httpd (pid 31093
suffering with this at present, and the suggestion of setting the
cache-control headers to max-age=0 does not work.
-
Buzzterrier
http://buzzterrier.blogspot.com/ View my blog: Ordinary Average Developer...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-and-Apache-with-mod_jk
57 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat and Apache with mod_jk
Hi,
I have dedicated RHEL5 boxes (dedicate quad core, 4GB RAM) setup with
both apache httpd and tomcat running on the same box, with a hardware
load balancer selecting the node a user is routed to. I have mod_jk
setup, but am seeing som
Ok thanks. Based on monitoring, I don't think it's the server taking
a long time to respond, it's probably the users doing as you suggested
- I just wanted to make sure the log file entries weren't serious. I
want to make sure the rising established connection count isn't
something to wor
Ian Long wrote:
[...]
Hi Ian. I don't know about the load balancing part, but the following
errors :
I'm also seeing a few errors like the following in mod_jk.log:
[Thu Mar 05 10:34:08.878 2009] [25849:3086382864] [info]
ajp_process_callback::jk_ajp_common.c (1603): Writing to client aborte
al Message-
From: Ian Long [mailto:ian.l...@opterus.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:57 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat and Apache with mod_jk
Hi,
I have dedicated RHEL5 boxes (dedicate quad core, 4GB RAM) setup with
both apache httpd and tomcat running on the same b
Hi,
I have dedicated RHEL5 boxes (dedicate quad core, 4GB RAM) setup with
both apache httpd and tomcat running on the same box, with a hardware
load balancer selecting the node a user is routed to. I have mod_jk
setup, but am seeing some behaviour I'm not sure is correct. This is
on htt
15 matches
Mail list logo
