rg
> Subject: Re: Question regarding Tomcat and Apache HTTPD Mod-proxy over
> SSL [EXTERNAL]
>
> Jon,
>
> If you want to secure the httpd <-> Tomcat link with mutually authenticated
> TLS then I believe it is possible based on reading the docs but a) haven't
&g
but a security
architect wants the other as well.
Thanks,
Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Jun 2, 2022 5:05 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question regarding Tomcat and Apache HTTPD Mod-proxy over SSL
y.com)
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Jun 2, 2022 5:05 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question regarding Tomcat and Apache HTTPD Mod-proxy over SSL
[EXTERNAL]
On 6/2/22 14:38, Beard, Shawn wrote:
> I've never done this. But I think it would go something like thi
On 6/2/22 14:38, Beard, Shawn wrote:
> I've never done this. But I think it would go something like this:
> To make tomcat take advantages of Client Authentication, require three
> certificates. i.e A Server Certificate for Tomcat, Client Certificate
> for the browser/Apache and Certificate of the
Jon,
On 6/2/22 14:20, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if there is a way to use certificates
between Tomcat and Apache for mutual authentication of the mod-proxy
connection to Tomcat. This would be similar as to how you can setup
the WebSphere plug
u have received this message in error, please advise
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for
your cooperation.
From: Beard, Shawn
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Question regarding Tomcat and Apache HTTPD Mod-proxy ov
ntial
-Original Message-
From: jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:21 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Question regarding Tomcat and Apache HTTPD Mod-proxy over SSL
[EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: External message
I'm trying to figure out if there is
I'm trying to figure out if there is a way to use certificates between Tomcat
and Apache for mutual authentication of the mod-proxy connection to Tomcat.
This would be similar as to how you can setup the WebSphere plugin to
communicate with WebSphere over a mutually secured connection. Is
> From: Adhavan Mathiyalagan [mailto:adhav@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: CLOSE_WAIT between Application (Tomcat) and Apache HTTPD
What part of do not top-post do you not understand?
> The Application port is configured in the catalina.properties file
> HTTP_PORT=8030
> JVM_ROUTE=
Hi,
The Application port is configured in the catalina.properties file
# String cache configuration.
tomcat.util.buf.StringCache.byte.enabled=true
#tomcat.util.buf.StringCache.char.enabled=true
#tomcat.util.buf.StringCache.trainThreshold=50
#tomcat.util.buf.StringCache.cacheSize=5000
SHUTDOWN
On 11.05.2017 17:32, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
Hi,
8030 is the port where the application is running.
/What/ application ?
Is that a stand-alone application ?
For Tomcat, I cannot say (because it is not clear below what value ${HTTP_PORT}
has.
But from your front-end balancer, it looks lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Adhavan,
On 5/11/17 11:32 AM, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
> 8030 is the port where the application is running.
Port 8030 appears nowhere in your configuration. Not in server.xml
(where you used ${HTTP_PORT}, which could plausibly be 8030) and not
i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Adhavan,
On 5/11/17 10:57 AM, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
> *Tomcat Configuration*
>
> HTTP/1.1 and APR
>
>
> connectionTimeout="2"
>
> redirectPort="8443" maxHttpHeaderSize="8192" />
Okay, so you have a number of defaults taking effect,
Hi,
8030 is the port where the application is running.
Regards,
Adhavan.M
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:53 PM, André Warnier (tomcat)
wrote:
> On 11.05.2017 16:57, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> *Tomcat Configuration*
>>
>> HTTP/1.1 and APR
>>
>> >
>> connectionT
On 11.05.2017 16:57, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
Hi Chris,
*Tomcat Configuration*
HTTP/1.1 and APR
${catalina.base}/conf/web.xml
*HTTPD Configuration*
ServerTokens OS
ServerRoot "/etc/httpd"
PidFile run/httpd.pid
Timeout 60
KeepAlive Off
MaxKeepAliveRequests 100
KeepAliv
Hi Chris,
*Tomcat Configuration*
HTTP/1.1 and APR
${catalina.base}/conf/web.xml
*HTTPD Configuration*
ServerTokens OS
ServerRoot "/etc/httpd"
PidFile run/httpd.pid
Timeout 60
KeepAlive Off
MaxKeepAliveRequests 100
KeepAliveTimeout 15
StartServers256
MinSpareServers1
Hi Chris,
The netstat O/P below for the CLOSE_WAIT connections
tcp 509 0 :::10.61.137.49:8030:::10.61.137.47:60903
CLOSE_WAIT
tcp 491 0 :::10.61.137.49:8030:::10.61.137.47:24856
CLOSE_WAIT
tcp 360 0 :::10.61.137.49:8030:::10.61.137
Dear André,
ups - yes, I confused both.
FIN ;)
Guido
On 11.05.2017 13:37, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> I believe that the explanation given below by Guido is incorrect and
> misleading, as it seems to confuse CLOSE_WAIT with TIME_WAIT.
> See : TCP/IP State Transition Diagram (RFC793)
>
> C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Adhavan,
On 5/11/17 9:30 AM, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
> The connections in the CLOSE_WAIT are owned by the Application
> /Tomcat process.
Okay. Can you please post your configuration on both httpd and Tomcat
sides? If it's not clear from your co
On 11.05.2017 15:30, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
Hi Chris,
The connections in the CLOSE_WAIT are owned by the Application /Tomcat
process.
Can you provide an example output of the "netstat" command that shows such connections ?
(not all, just some)
(copy and paste it right here)
->
Regard
Hi Chris,
The connections in the CLOSE_WAIT are owned by the Application /Tomcat
process.
Regards,
Adhavan.M
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Adhavan,
>
> On 5/10/17 12:32 PM, Adha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Adhavan,
On 5/10/17 12:32 PM, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
> Team,
>
> Tomcat version : 8.0.18
>
> Apache HTTPD version : 2.2
>
>
> There are lot of CLOSE_WAIT connections being created at the
> Application(tomcat) ,when the traffic is routed t
o
-Original Message-
From: Adhavan Mathiyalagan [mailto:adhav@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:32 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: CLOSE_WAIT between Application (Tomcat) and Apache HTTPD
Team,
Tomcat version : 8.0.18
Apache HTTPD version : 2.2
There are lot of CLOSE_WA
s).
>
> Guido
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Adhavan Mathiyalagan [mailto:adhav....@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:32 PM
> >To: Tomcat Users List
> >Subject: CLOSE_WAIT between Application (Tomcat) and Apache HTTPD
> >
> >Tea
: CLOSE_WAIT between Application (Tomcat) and Apache HTTPD
>
>Team,
>
>Tomcat version : 8.0.18
>
>Apache HTTPD version : 2.2
>
>
>There are lot of CLOSE_WAIT connections being created at the
>Application(tomcat) ,when the traffic is routed through the Apache HTTPD
>l
On 10/05/17 17:32, Adhavan Mathiyalagan wrote:
> Team,
>
> Tomcat version : 8.0.18
That is over two years old. Have you considered updating?
> Apache HTTPD version : 2.2
>
>
> There are lot of CLOSE_WAIT connections being created at the
> Application(tomcat) ,when the traffic is routed throug
Team,
Tomcat version : 8.0.18
Apache HTTPD version : 2.2
There are lot of CLOSE_WAIT connections being created at the
Application(tomcat) ,when the traffic is routed through the Apache HTTPD
load balancer to the Application running over tomcat container. This leads
to slowness of the port wher
2016-01-14 13:27 GMT+03:00 Weare Borg :
> Hello friends,
>
> I recently scanned our domain Qualys SSL lab and found out that we have 2
> problems as listed below :
>
> 1) This server is vulnerable to the POODLE attack. If possible, disable SSL
> 3 to mitigate. Grade capped to C
> 2) This server acc
Hello friends,
I recently scanned our domain Qualys SSL lab and found out that we have 2
problems as listed below :
1) This server is vulnerable to the POODLE attack. If possible, disable SSL
3 to mitigate. Grade capped to C
2) This server accepts RC4 cipher, but only with older protocol versions
On 05.04.2011 22:44, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
FYI, I have this tentatively working with mod_unique_id by doing:
Apache config:
RequestHeader set UNIQUE_ID %{UNIQUE_ID}e
JkEnvVar UNIQUE_ID
Tomcat accesslogvalve pattern:
%{UNIQUE_ID}i
I might use it like this, I might not. They
apache_host:unique_id
Thanks,
-Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony J. Biacco [mailto:abia...@formatdynamics.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 1:55 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: tomcat and apache log entry correlation with mod_jk
>
> Nothing yet, was in resea
Nothing yet, was in research and spitball mode, but am currently looking at
mod_unique_id
-Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 1:08 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: tomcat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony,
On 4/5/2011 2:21 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
> I'm using apache 2.0.17, tomcat 6.0.28 (and soon tomcat 7) with mod_jk
> 1.2.28 on CentOS 5.5
> I'd like to put a unique identifier in the tomcat request log and the
> apache request log so that
I'm using apache 2.0.17, tomcat 6.0.28 (and soon tomcat 7) with mod_jk
1.2.28 on CentOS 5.5
I'd like to put a unique identifier in the tomcat request log and the
apache request log so that I can match up log entries between the two.
Is there any way to do this with mod_jk, maybe with JkEnvVar? And
> From: WILLIAMer [mailto:william.tz...@echannelopen.com.tw]
> Subject: connect tomcat and apache by mod_jk2
>
> I have connect tomcat and apache by mod_jk2
That was a mistake. mod_jk2 has been deprecated for many years. Please try
again with supported versions of Tomcat, httpd
Hi, ALL.
I have connect tomcat and apache by mod_jk2 at the same machine(solaris).
I can see the application page with http://localhost:4080/
or http://localhost/ by apache.
Now, i need to move tomcat to another machine in LAN.
So i change the workers2.properties setting like under
---original
e this helps,
Wesley
-Original Message-
From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Peter Crowther
Sent: 2009年12月17日 18:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Ask about an architecture of High Availability with Tomcat and
Apache
Why are yo
: Ask about an architecture of High Availability with Tomcat and
Apache
Why are you using httpd - what purpose is it serving other than to act as a
load-balancer to Tomcat, which you should be able to do directly from the
Cisco load balancer?
2009/12/17 Peter Chen
>
Why are you using httpd - what purpose is it serving other than to act as a
load-balancer to Tomcat, which you should be able to do directly from the
Cisco load balancer?
2009/12/17 Peter Chen
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I made architecture of High Availability with Tomcat and Apache, here I
Peter Chen wrote:
Hi,
I made architecture of High Availability with Tomcat and Apache, here I
will describe it simply.
Peter,
while there are plenty of people here who try to help Tomcat users by
answering precise technical questions about Tomcat on their own donated
time, I think that
Hi,
I made architecture of High Availability with Tomcat and Apache, here I
will describe it simply.
USERS
|
INTERNET
|
Firewall
|
CSS
/ \
/ \
Apache Apache
HTTP Server HTTP Server
Nikolay Diulgerov wrote:
> About the double deployment ... you seems to be right
Odd that...
> but if I dont want
> to rename the app to ROOT can I move it to for example
> /myapp
> and then to have
>
Yes. If the docBase is outside of the Host's appBase then you can do that.
> And second ... is
Nikolay Diulgerov wrote:
> Mark,
> what do you mean by
> separation of httpd and Tomcat
I mean that my own view is that httpd and Tomcat should not be serving
content from the same directory structure. That way only Tomcat can
possibly serve the files Tomcat is meant to serve and only httpd can
se
About the double deployment ... you seems to be right but if I dont want
to rename the app to ROOT can I move it to for example
/myapp
and then to have
And second ... is there an option to change so not
/tomcat/webapps/ROOT is the default but
/tomcat/webapps/myapp is the default.
Nikolay
Mark,
what do you mean by
separation of httpd and Tomcat
Do you mean that httpd should redirect all requests to tomcat and not
serve static files?
Or that httpd should have alias /myapp
and still serve static files for it.
Or something different?
Mark Thomas wrote:
Nikolay Diulgerov
Nikolay Diulgerov wrote:
> I wonder then if I can use in server.xml
>
> To change the default application serving when someone requests
> myserver.com:8080
No. That will result in double deployment. Just rename webapps/myapp to
webapps/ROOT
> And then in apache to use
>
> DocumentRoot "/tomcat/
I wonder then if I can use in server.xml
To change the default application serving when someone requests
myserver.com:8080
And then in apache to use
DocumentRoot "/tomcat/webapps/myapp"
Options FollowSymlinks
DirectoryIndex index.html login.jsp
AllowOverride None
Allow from all
Nikolay Diulgerov wrote:
> hello there,
> I just wonder if there is an option to configure apache to serve as
> document root /tomcat/webapps/myapp
Unless you are very careful (and you haven't been - /WEB-INF/ &
/META-INF/ are wide open), that is a really bad idea from a security
point of view. It
hello there,
I just wonder if there is an option to configure apache to serve as
document root /tomcat/webapps/myapp
I have in apache
DocumentRoot "/tomcat/webapps/myapp"
Options FollowSymlinks
DirectoryIndex index.jsp
AllowOverride None
Allow from all
JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
Jk
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
> If Apache HTTPD is dropped for a pure Tomcat solution, which standard
> modules have Tomcat equivalent solutions? For example:
> - Mod Rewrite
http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/ -- it's Close To A Standard :-)
> - HTTPS
> - Virtual Hosts
Hi,
If Apache HTTPD is dropped for a pure Tomcat solution, which standard
modules have
Tomcat equivalent solutions? For example:
- Mod Rewrite
- HTTPS
- Virtual Hosts
It may be interesting to get some of this into the official Tomcat
documentation.
André-John
---
The 64.225.156.250 is the IP address that apache httpd and tomcat are
running on. To me it looks as if there is a 'default' host that those
'GET /' requests are being handled by. I assume
that VHost is the virtual host within tomcat that actually handled the
request, based on the definitio
On 06.03.2009 21:02, Ian Long wrote:
I have fixed the problem by stopping the https ping so that these stuck
processes don't happen, but am digging into the problem a bit further.
I think you are right that it's apache waiting for tomcat to send data
back for the request, because if I look at th
I have fixed the problem by stopping the https ping so that these
stuck processes don't happen, but am digging into the problem a bit
further.
I think you are right that it's apache waiting for tomcat to send data
back for the request, because if I look at the tomcat manager
application,
omcat and Apache with mod_jk
Here is some sample output from the system-status:
Srv PID Acc M CPU SS Req ConnChild
SlotClient VHost Request
0-0 20960/50/50 _ 0.0123 2 0.0 0.09
0.09X web1.opterus.com
I just took a subset of the list, the other few hundred processes were
also stuck in the same state. From the tomcat logs it looks like the
response has been sent back. I have seen cases where a firewall
doesn't recognize a connection has been closed.
On 5-Mar-09, at 7:05 PM, Rainer Jung
On 06.03.2009 00:44, Ian Long wrote:
Here is some sample output from the system-status:
Srv PID Acc M CPU SS Req Conn Child Slot Client VHost Request
0-0 2096 0/50/50 _ 0.01 23 2 0.0 0.09 0.09 X web1.opterus.com GET
/lbcheck.faces HTTP/1.0
1-0 2097 0/12/12 W 0.01 513 0 0.0 0.05 0.05 X web1.opter
Here is some sample output from the system-status:
Srv PID Acc M CPU SS Req ConnChild Slot
Client VHost Request
0-0 2096 0/50/50 _ 0.01 23 2 0.0 0.09 0.09 X web1.opterus.com GET /
lbcheck.faces HTTP/1.0
1-0 2097 0/12/12 W 0.01 513 0 0.0 0.05 0.05 X
stion of setting the
> cache-control headers to max-age=0 does not work.
>
>
>
-
Buzzterrier
http://buzzterrier.blogspot.com/ View my blog: Ordinary Average Developer...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-and-Apache-with-mod_jk-tp22356983p22361683.html
On 05.03.2009 21:04, Ian Long wrote:
I haven't actually - I will turn it on and restart the server tonight.
Another thing that I find strange is the apache (using prefork MPM)
seems to keep increasing the number of child processes. For example,
when I run:
service httpd status
httpd (pid 31093
suffering with this at present, and the suggestion of setting the
cache-control headers to max-age=0 does not work.
-
Buzzterrier
http://buzzterrier.blogspot.com/ View my blog: Ordinary Average Developer...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-and-Apache-with-mod_jk
57 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat and Apache with mod_jk
Hi,
I have dedicated RHEL5 boxes (dedicate quad core, 4GB RAM) setup with
both apache httpd and tomcat running on the same box, with a hardware
load balancer selecting the node a user is routed to. I have mod_jk
setup, but am seeing som
Ok thanks. Based on monitoring, I don't think it's the server taking
a long time to respond, it's probably the users doing as you suggested
- I just wanted to make sure the log file entries weren't serious. I
want to make sure the rising established connection count isn't
something to wor
Ian Long wrote:
[...]
Hi Ian. I don't know about the load balancing part, but the following
errors :
I'm also seeing a few errors like the following in mod_jk.log:
[Thu Mar 05 10:34:08.878 2009] [25849:3086382864] [info]
ajp_process_callback::jk_ajp_common.c (1603): Writing to client aborte
al Message-
From: Ian Long [mailto:ian.l...@opterus.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:57 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat and Apache with mod_jk
Hi,
I have dedicated RHEL5 boxes (dedicate quad core, 4GB RAM) setup with
both apache httpd and tomcat running on the same b
Hi,
I have dedicated RHEL5 boxes (dedicate quad core, 4GB RAM) setup with
both apache httpd and tomcat running on the same box, with a hardware
load balancer selecting the node a user is routed to. I have mod_jk
setup, but am seeing some behaviour I'm not sure is correct. This is
on htt
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>>>>
>>>> it seems possi
n.
A-
On 10/31/08 10:56 AM, "Petr Sumbera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>
>>> From: Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>>>
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>>
>> it seems possible to run Tomcat on a non-privileged port with a
>> non-root account and have re
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a good point.
>
> What is your preferred method of running Tomcat? JSVC? Startup / shutdown
> scripts? Front-end with Apache HTTP server? Standalone?
standalone with start/shutdown scripts as non
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>>
>> it seems possible to run Tomcat on a non-privileged port with a
>> non-root account and have requests for port 443 redirected to
>> Tomcat's listening port.
>
> Of co
> From: Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>
> it seems possible to run Tomcat on a non-privileged port with a
> non-root account and have requests for port 443 redirected to
> Tomcat's listening
d use JSVC. I haven't
done this yet, which is why I started the "JSVC vs startup / shutdown
scripts" thread.
Would love your $0.02,
A-
On 10/30/08 1:56 PM, "Caldarale, Charles R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> From: Petr Sumbera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From: Petr Sumbera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: relation between Tomcat and Apache Commons
>
> Btw I don't see any benefit using jsvc. Is somebody using it? Why?
Judging from the comments on this list, many people are using it. The primary
reason is to avoid runni
how about commons-daemon.jar in bin directory?
According to http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/setup.html it is used
with jsvc only.
Btw I don't see any benefit using jsvc. Is somebody using it? Why?
Thanks,
Petr
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/relation-between-To
PetrS schrieb:
>
> Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
> And what about Eclipse JDT Runtime Binary? Are these also renamed into
> jasper-jdt.jar? The same reason?
Here it's slightly different: The jar file used to include JDT is named
non-standard, but the classes contained in it still have the original
org.ecl
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/relation-between-Tomcat-and-Apache-Commons-tp20145816p20149674.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apach
Petr Sumbera schrieb:
> Hi Tomcat gurus,
>
> The question I have is rather philosophical and not really technical
> (I'm evaluating Tomcat 6 integration into OpenSolaris).
>
> While compiling Tomcat 6.0.16 it requires:
>
> Apache Commons Daemon
> Apache Commons Collections
> Apache Commons DBCP
Hi Tomcat gurus,
The question I have is rather philosophical and not really technical
(I'm evaluating Tomcat 6 integration into OpenSolaris).
While compiling Tomcat 6.0.16 it requires:
Apache Commons Daemon
Apache Commons Collections
Apache Commons DBCP
Apache Commons Pool
But after compilatio
Tim Potter wrote:
the way you have it configured.. test.jsp would only render if implemented
=
in the 'ROOT' webapp of TC
I would suggest implementing a test webapp where the exact physical
location of test.jsp would be
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/test/test.jsp
Regards/
Martin
Ok, that works f
> the way you have it configured.. test.jsp would only render if implemented
=
> in the 'ROOT' webapp of TC
>
> I would suggest implementing a test webapp where the exact physical
location of test.jsp would be
> $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/test/test.jsp
>
> Regards/
> Martin
Ok, that works fine, howeve
ecessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:20:32 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomcat and apache and jk_mod HowTo
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Tim Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> I also added >> modJk="/usr/lib/apache2/mod_jk.so"
>>> workersConfig="/etc/apache2/workers.properties" /> between and
>>> in the conf/server.x
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I also added > modJk="/usr/lib/apache2/mod_jk.so"
>> workersConfig="/etc/apache2/workers.properties" /> between and
>> in the conf/server.xml file
>>
>
> The listeners are only needed if you want Tomcat to generate a mod
I also added between and
in the conf/server.xml file
The listeners are only needed if you want Tomcat to generate a mod_jk
configuration for you. The files which are auto-generated by the
listener are not very good though. I would suggest to write a simple
workers.properties yourself.
w
> > I attempted these changes and stopped tomcat and apache, then started
apache
> > and got the following error:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 start
> > * Starting web server apache2
> >
Syntax
> > error on line 2 of /etc/apac
planned to use this HowTo to get mod_jk configured in Tomcat and Apache,
but am seeing different references and believe this article might be a few
versions behind:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/quick.html
This section:
Here is the minimum which should be set in httpd.c
ache2/modules/mod_jk.so to that file.
BTW: I have also setup the user webapp access successfully and can connect
to http://localhost:8090/~username/webapp.jsp
I planned to use this HowTo to get mod_jk configured in Tomcat and Apache,
but am seeing different references and believe this article might
> 401 response to the browser, and that is how *the browser* then "knows".
> Apache never "knows".
>
>
> [...]
>
>
> André
>
>
> -
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@t
sridharmnj wrote:
- there is only one Apache, and one Tomcat, on the same physical server
yes
- there are no Apache VirtualHosts (or there is only one), and there is
only one Tomcat section in server.xml
Apache virtualhost is there, and tomcat host is - the back-end for the authentication is
> From: sridharmnj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Single sign on issue with Tomcat and Apache
>
> Is it a better idea to move apache pages (bbb) into the
> tomcat (ccc)?
If you're not using httpd for anything other than serving static content, then
yes, get rid of i
> Johnny Kewl wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "sridharmnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: Single sign on issue with Tomcat and Apache
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
Well, Johnny, we seem to agree..
Johnny Kewl wrote:
- Original Message - From: "sridharmnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: Single sign on issue with Tomcat and Apache
Many thanks to all of you for responding to my problem
k to the
>>>> same domain name, and the distinguishing only on sub context...
>>>> ie
>>>> aaa.com/images/in apache
>>>> aaa.com/webapp/someservlet and the call is passed thru to TC
>>>>
>>>> Then the browser will like it and return t
sridharmnj wrote:
Many thanks to all of you for responding to my problem.
I apologize, I hope I didnot mention my system architecture clearly. (As I
mentioned, it is an old application, which was developed 9 yrs ago, and no
documentation at all :-( )
I am accessing those applications like..
ww
- Original Message -
From: "sridharmnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: Single sign on issue with Tomcat and Apache
Many thanks to all of you for responding to my problem.
I apologize, I hope I didnot mention my sys
sridharmnj wrote:
Many thanks to all of you for responding to my problem.
I apologize, I hope I didnot mention my system architecture clearly. (As I
mentioned, it is an old application, which was developed 9 yrs ago, and no
documentation at all :-( )
I am accessing those applications like..
----------
>> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
Johnny Kewl wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Propes, Barry L "
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Hi,
I am integrating two websites using single sign on. I have two sites
namely
aaa.com and bbb.com.
I enabled SingleSignOn valve in server.xml file, and trying to acces
- Original Message -
From: "André Warnier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: Single sign on issue with Tomcat and Apache
Johnny Kewl wrote:
- Original Message - From: "André
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
