On 25.08.2010 20:57, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 8/25/2010 11:15 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: Tomcat Version Numbers
why not have a tag progression that
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Version Numbers
> Okay. Does that mean that:
> [DIR] v6.0.2-alpha/ 2006-11-16 00:02-
> [DIR] v6.0.2-beta/2006-11-16 00:02-
> [DIR] v6.0.2/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 8/25/2010 11:15 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat Version Numbers
>
>> why not have a tag progression that looks like this:
>
On 25/08/2010 16:23, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> For those who never read http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html, or
> don't understand it (btw: that page says 7.0.0 is the current version of
> the 7.0.x versions), downloading the highest version number available
> (7.0.2) might not be such a
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Version Numbers
> there's a 6.0.0-alpha, and then a 6.0.0, unqualified.
> Does that mean that 6.0.0 was stable -- at least after
> the alpha stage?
Yes. (I missed the unmarked 6.0.0 le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 8/25/2010 10:30 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
> On 25 August 2010 15:23, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
>> Again, this is partly because I feel a certain sense of order which
>> requires releases to be X.0.0.
>>
>> Why? And by "release" do you
On 25 August 2010 15:23, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Again, this is partly because I feel a certain sense of order which
> requires releases to be X.0.0.
>
> Why? And by "release" do you mean "stable, production-quality releases
that we'll stake our reputations on" (in which case almost every x.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 8/20/2010 12:36 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Tomcat Version Numbers
>>
>> What was the first version of TC 6.0 that was considered
On 20/08/2010 17:36, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> Given that, there's no telling which 7.0 version will be the
>> first stable one, right?
>
> Mark seems to be close to recommending stable, but yes, there's no telling.
Ultimately it is a community decision. The more folks that use the betas
an
Len Popp wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:26, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
It's not that I
don't get it... it's that I have a deep-seated need for the release
version to be called 7.0.0 for some reason.
Call me cynical, but I naturally assume that a major new version will
have more bugs (no ma
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:26, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> It's not that I
> don't get it... it's that I have a deep-seated need for the release
> version to be called 7.0.0 for some reason.
Call me cynical, but I naturally assume that a major new version will
have more bugs (no matter how much
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Tomcat Version Numbers
>
> Will the TC 7.x versions numbers increase like 7.0.3, 7.0.4,
> and then at some point it will be considered "stable"?
Yes.
> That sounds like Tomcat 7.0.0 is no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I have a question about Tomcat versions numbers, prompted by the recent
announcement of TC 7.0.2 beta.
Will the TC 7.x versions numbers increase like 7.0.3, 7.0.4, and then at
some point it will be considered "stable"? That sounds like Tomcat 7.
From: "Caldarale, Charles R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: November 22, 2005 10:52:49 AM EST
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Subject: RE: suppress tomcat version numbers
From: Kiarna Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: suppress tomcat version numbers
Hi I'm trying
> From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: suppress tomcat version numbers
>
> This seems to be a new option for TC 5.5. Do you know of anything
> similar for 5.0?
Sorry, I don't - haven't used 5.0 for a long time, since the performance
of
Hi Charles,
This seems to be a new option for TC 5.5. Do you know of anything
similar for 5.0?
Thanks
Andrew
On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:52 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Kiarna Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: suppress tomcat version numbers
Hi I'm trying to suppres
> From: Kiarna Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: suppress tomcat version numbers
>
> Hi I'm trying to suppress the version number Tomcat gives in its
> headers.
Read the doc on the tag. You're looking for the "server"
attribute (the description ment
Hi I'm trying to suppress the version number Tomcat gives in its
headers.
Maybe I'm not looking online for the correct phrasing of this issue for
either version 4.0.6 or 5.0.28.
Could someone please point me in the right direction?
Thank you.
-Kiarna
18 matches
Mail list logo
