Re: Tomcat performance goes down after install apr.

Well, here is the information the platform (OS) redhat enterprise 6.4(64 bit) - the Java JVM version used (1.7.45) - the Tomcat version used (7.0.45) - the APR version used (APR from redhat cd) On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, André Warnier wrote: > 杨华杰 wrote: > >> Tomcat performan

Re: Tomcat performance goes down after install apr.

杨华杰 wrote: Tomcat performance goes down after install apr. I followed this doc http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/, I think the different is I didn't set sslengine setting as I don't use it. And I saw the error in catilina.out, I simply ignore it as I don't use it. I fired

Tomcat performance goes down after install apr.

Tomcat performance goes down after install apr. I followed this doc http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/, I think the different is I didn't set sslengine setting as I don't use it. And I saw the error in catilina.out, I simply ignore it as I don't use it. I fired 300 concur

Re: Need settings/configuration details to improve tomcat performance

Akbar Thanakalacheruvu wrote: Hi All We are deploying around 10 to 15 websites on a tomcat server where each website will have concurrency of 100 users at a given time. This concurrency will continue though out the day. So, I need settings/configuration details of tomcat server to improve its

Need settings/configuration details to improve tomcat performance

Hi All We are deploying around 10 to 15 websites on a tomcat server where each website will have concurrency of 100 users at a given time. This concurrency will continue though out the day. So, I need settings/configuration details of tomcat server to improve its performance. Please forward/sug

Re: Need settings/configuration details to improve tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Akbar, On 9/11/13 1:47 PM, Akbar Thanakalacheruvu wrote: > We are deploying around 10 to 15 websites on a tomcat server where > each website will have concurrency of 100 users at a given time. 100 sessions or 100 simultaneous requests/connections

Re: Need settings/configuration details to improve tomcat performance

On 9/11/2013 1:47 PM, Akbar Thanakalacheruvu wrote: Hi All We are deploying around 10 to 15 websites on a tomcat server where each website will have concurrency of 100 users at a given time. This concurrency will continue though out the day. So, I need settings/configuration details of tomcat

Re: Need settings/configuration details to improve tomcat performance

Hi for better request handling you need to know all about tomcat connectors , just try jk_mod with tomcat http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.3-doc/mod_jk-howto.html http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Akbar Thanakalacheruvu < akb...@sumtotalsystems.com> wrot

Re: Tomcat performance problem

On 25/11/2012 00:50, Alex Moskvin wrote: > Hi, > > I am using Tomcat 7.0.30 and OpenEJB 4.5 to host high loaded app and at > some point found with VisualVM there is a bottleneck when there is a lot of > concurrent requests (about 400-600 req/sec). Requests and responses are > small (usually not la

Re: Tomcat performance problem

millisecond and then I started to see latency from network external to my company.   Good Hunting. -Tony --- On Sat, 11/24/12, Alex Moskvin wrote: From: Alex Moskvin Subject: Tomcat performance problem To: users@tomcat.apache.org, users-h...@tomcat.apache.org Date: Saturday, November 24, 2012

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

t; > -Original Message- > From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:19 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. > > Hello Talha, > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Talha Fazal wrote:

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

Hello Christopher, On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Leon, > > On 9/2/2011 4:19 PM, Leon Rosenberg wrote: >> from my experience there is no need for apache in your >> setup anyway . > > Uh, load-balancing? Aeh... load

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

Paste the workers.properties file and the mod_jk settings here. Are you using prefork or mpm in Apache? Have you tuned the apache settings to match the tomcat number of threads? Igor On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNE

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leon, On 9/2/2011 4:19 PM, Leon Rosenberg wrote: > from my experience there is no need for apache in your > setup anyway . Uh, load-balancing? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla

RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.

exposed to outside attacks; B) Load balancing. Thanks Leon! -Original Message- From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:19 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. Hello Talha, On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Talha

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

> Thanks, > > > -Original Message- > From: R Batchelor [mailto:rsbat...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:10 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. > > Have you ruled out issues with db connection pooling? NO. I

RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.

o try mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy instead of mod_jk. Any thoughts here? Thanks, -Original Message- From: R Batchelor [mailto:rsbat...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:10 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. Have you ruled out issues with db conne

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

'd but all the database users/connections are idle.  These can be symptoms of an application mis-managing its dbcp pools. From: Leon Rosenberg To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 7:55 AM Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. Hello Talh

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

omcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. > > Hello Talha, > > seems that your tomcats are fine. > Question, you mention that the tomcat do not perform, but you don't > tell us how you come to this conclusion except for cpu load. ANSWER: LOOKING > INTO

RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.

[mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:16 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning. > From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com] > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning. > We did take a thread dump and we found a lot of threa

RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.

Hi Leon, Please see any answers in CAPS below. -Original Message- From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:06 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. Hello Talha, seems that your tomcats are fine. Question

RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.

> From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com] > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning. > We did take a thread dump and we found a lot of threads locked. > "http-8014-9" daemon prio=10 tid=0x60965c00 nid=0x6c83 in > Ob

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

t; > Thanks! > > -Original Message- > From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:35 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. > > Hello Talha, > > from a quick glance at your post, do you have

RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.

ject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning. > From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com] > Subject: Tomcat Performance Turning. > In our staging environment for load testing, when we run the load > test using 525 concurrent users, the app doesn't perform at all. > The CPU usage (on Apach

RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.

Plz. see my answers below in UPPERCAPS. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:35 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning. Hello Talha, from a quick glance at your post, do you have

RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.

> From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com] > Subject: Tomcat Performance Turning. > In our staging environment for load testing, when we run the load > test using 525 concurrent users, the app doesn't perform at all. > The CPU usage (on Apache and Tomcat Servers) hover

Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.

Hello Talha, from a quick glance at your post, do you have the same 30 max threads limit in weblogic? Because sending 525 users through 2x30=60 max threads seems a little bottlenecky. Which software are you using to produce the load? Does it keepalive the connections? regards Leon On Fri, Sep 2,

Tomcat Performance Turning.

Background: We have a moderately high traffic web application (between 8 to 21 million hits/day) running Apache to serve static content (also to load balance and create a DMZ) and Weblogic to serve dynamic content (Struts 1.1 based Java web application). We are trying to replace Weblogic with T

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 6/30/2011 11:23 AM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I suspect Tomcat might support the lib you mentioned Tomcat does not need to support the library specifically: if a library properly uses the Servlet and/or JSP APIs properly, it should work with Tom

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

: Thu, June 30, 2011 9:19:49 AM Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues... 2011/6/30 Tony Anecito : > Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is Tomcat > 6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's which means 7 has more > issues with this &qu

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

2011/6/30 Tony Anecito : > Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is > Tomcat > 6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's which means 7 has more > issues with this "Standard" taglib. > > I could be wrong but the highest level of support is servlet 2.4 an

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

t 2.5. Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Tony Anecito To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Wed, June 29, 2011 5:10:33 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues... Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead project seemed like there was no version that s

Re: Tomcat performance issues...

Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead project seemed like there was no version that supported Tomcat 6.0.x. I will continue the message thread onto that group thanks for the advice. I am a tester but the response time was 3-4 seconds. I have not asked the

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Folks: I might be a little to this discussion. I have taken upon myself; (don't ask why I asked for that kind of pain ;o) to review how IIS and tomcat inter operate and just released in beta a new connector specifically for IIS7 / tomcat (though this works in IIS6 as well). You can download bina

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Christopher Schultz schrieb am 01.03.2011 um 16:56 (-0500): > I find *NIX smaller, cleaner, simpler, more scriptable and > remotely administratable (is that a word? maybe administerable?) > than Windows. The word is: administrable http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-abilis http://en.wiktionary.org/wi

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Hi Chuck, You did not see my earlier response where I came to the same conclusion about the types after looking at some other sites including a wiki. Yes there was some confusion but now I am clear that it is compiler dependant as I said earlier. Thanks, -Tony

RE: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com] > Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > On page 4 of the following port guide: > http://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/dw/jdk/64bitporting/64BitJavaPortingGuide.pdf > It states:For Windows, on 32-bit systems, inte

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

/isapi/tomcat performance Actually according to the IBM porting guide longs are different byte lengths depending upon what frame of reference they are speaking to. On page 4 of the following port guide: http://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/dw/jdk/64bitporting/64BitJavaPortingGuide.pdf It states:For

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

vious message.   Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Christopher Schultz To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Wed, March 2, 2011 7:12:43 PM Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 6:27 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 3/1/2011 6:09 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] >> Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > >> I don't understand why communicating a 64-b

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 6:27 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I believe the effect of compression is relative. In other words for a big > program with lots of 64-bit pointers and 64-bit longs it is helps but for > small > programs it does not. A long in Java i

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

I do not know what the "My bad" limit per day is but I am sure you are fine. :] -Tony - Original Message From: David kerber To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Wed, March 2, 2011 10:20:57 AM Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance On 3/2/2011 12:03 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: >

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

On 3/2/2011 12:03 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: As stated in my message I was using the -server option for the server jvm. -Tony My bad; I missed that. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

As stated in my message I was using the -server option for the server jvm. -Tony - Original Message From: David kerber To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 2:23:45 PM Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > Thanks Chris I w

RE: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > The question I have is how does the bus controller know > that there are multiple 32-bit values coming down the line, > and that it can send them simultaneously d

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

ry to not get emotional about it but I do miss my 8080 and Z80. -Tony - Original Message From: "Caldarale, Charles R" To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 4:09:10 PM Subject: RE: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@chri

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

From: Christopher Schultz To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 3:00:53 PM Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I guess you have not read my last email yet. I think of it

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Message From: Christopher Schultz To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 2:45:39 PM Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 4:33 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I used Tomcat separately because JBoss was always somew

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 3/1/2011 5:42 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] >> Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > >> Are you saying that a 32-bit JVM runnin

RE: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > I don't understand why communicating a 64-bit value over a > 64-bit bus would take longer than communicating a 32-bit > value over a 64-bit bus: Because

RE: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > Are you saying that a 32-bit JVM running on a 64-bit machine > somehow utilizes the 64-bit bus? Malarkey. I wouldn't bet on that. Intel goes to great pains

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I guess you have not read my last email yet. I think of it as putting two > 32-bit pieces of info on a 64-bit data bus whereas for two 64-bit pieces of > information it takes two fetches or twice as

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bruce, On 3/1/2011 4:42 PM, Bruce Pease wrote: > I'm just curious if anyone is using a 64 bit version of Linux, and has seen > performance degradation. We are looking to move off the Windows platform > eventually anyway. I'm not using 64-bit, but I

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 4:33 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I used Tomcat separately because JBoss was always somewhat behind the current > production version of Tomcat. Eventually I will remove JBoss and use JDBC > from > Tomcat to my database to reduce memo

RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

omcat Users List Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance Hi Chris, I used Tomcat separately because JBoss was always somewhat behind the current production version of Tomcat. Eventually I will remove JBoss and use JDBC from Tomcat to my database to reduce memory footprint and improve performance.

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

lient program. Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Christopher Schultz To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 2:17:46 PM Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, Good thing these are marked as [OT]... we have totally hij

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: Thanks Chris I will take a look at it. I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I was shooting for less than 1msec at Tomcat which I not have done. Now I want to get to 100 microseconds. Years ago from an logical architectu

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Hi Chris, I guess you have not read my last email yet. I think of it as putting two 32-bit pieces of info on a 64-bit data bus whereas for two 64-bit pieces of information it takes two fetches or twice as long on the same hardware. Depending upon the number of bytes for each data type for 3

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, Good thing these are marked as [OT]... we have totally hijacked Bruce's thread. Maybe we should start another. On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I > was > shoot

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

, March 1, 2011 1:42:37 PM Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 2:49 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I understand it is from the core AWS but the important thing for me was to > eliminate AJP because in a AWS standalone I had u

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 3:24 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > Also, I have not programmed in assembly language or in hexadecimal for some > time but I would hope that for a 32-bit java process running on a 64-bit > processor I would fetch a 32-bit pointer and m

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 3/1/2011 2:49 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I understand it is from the core AWS but the important thing for me was to > eliminate AJP because in a AWS standalone I had used to communicate AJP. > When I enabled ARP I did not have to do anything

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

On 02/28/2011 07:15 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Bruce Pease [mailto:bpe...@wth.com] Subject: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance In performance tests I have found the configuration runs dramatically slower than it's corresponding server in 32 bit Windows on 2000 Server and Tom

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

on how much worse things get is based upon how many pointers and longs are used for 64-bit java that are used. Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Tony Anecito To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 12:44:37 PM Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance Hi Chris

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

? Thanks, -Tony - Original Message From: Christopher Schultz To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 8:31:54 AM Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 2/28/2011 4:21 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I also use Native

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

the keywords: java 64-bit vs 32-bit performance You will find alot of discussion about this. Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Christopher Schultz To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 8:29:11 AM Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 2/28/2011 4:21 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > I also use Native APR with Tomcat 7 which eliminates AJP and > supposedly is faster than Apache Web Server It's probably the same as AWS, as the code is the same :) > http://people.apache.org/~schul

Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony, On 2/28/2011 2:57 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > Since the memory pointers are larger you may need to increase your heap size > but > you can compress the address pointers. +1 > Also, if you use JNI and it is 32-bit then you will have unexpected

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 1:08:19 PM Subject: RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance Thanks for the insight.  It looks like we are going to go with server 2003 32 bit.  I found some references that suggest ajp 1.3 has a performance issue in 64 bit server 2008. -Original Message- From: Tony

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 3:01 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > > I forgot to mention new versions of Windows are slower than XP. So that > would > > contribute to your issues

RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance I forgot to mention new versions of Windows are slower than XP. So that would contribute to your issues. Windows 7 got better but not as fast as 32-bit. Also, you might want to measure from tomcat perspective so you have a new baseline

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Anecito To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 12:57:03 PM Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance Since the memory pointers are larger you may need to increase your heap size but you can compress the address pointers. Also, if you use JNI and it is 32-bit then you will have

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance JVM settings should not be the same. Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Bruce Pease To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 11:46:35 AM Subject: RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance Perhaps my point is being missed here.  The

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

JVM settings should not be the same. Regards, -Tony - Original Message From: Bruce Pease To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 11:46:35 AM Subject: RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance Perhaps my point is being missed here.  The issue is moving from 32 bit is slower in 64

RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

ne is using a similar setup, and has been able to get it to perform well. -Original Message- From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 1:40 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance I agree with Charles. I run a perfor

Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

m the future of Java winner") Founder, MyUniPortal (JavaOne 2010 "Duke's Award Winner") http://www.myuniportal.com   - Original Message From: "Caldarale, Charles R" To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 11:15:40 AM Subject: RE: IIS7/isapi/tomc

RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

> From: Bruce Pease [mailto:bpe...@wth.com] > Subject: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance > In performance tests I have found the configuration runs > dramatically slower than it's corresponding server in 32 > bit Windows on 2000 Server and Tomcat 6. Until you quantify &q

IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance

Good Afternoon: I am attempting to run a Windows x64 server with IIS7 and Tomcat 7. I have 64 bit versions of JDK (1.6.26) and Tomcat (7.0.8). The server is set up with IIS using ajp1.3 to a local cluster of Tomcat servers. In performance tests I have found the configuration runs dramaticall

RE: Tomcat performance under low load

ently tuned but for some reason, the file access is slow. We haven't yet got the exact reason yet, so have to wait and see. Vijay From: vijay_me...@hotmail.com To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: RE: Tomcat performance under low load Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:42:30 +1000 Thanks for t

Re: Tomcat performance under low load

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vijay, On 10/16/2010 6:42 PM, Vijay Menon wrote: > Thanks for the replies. Based on that, we did change the connectors > to use executor threads. However, based on profiling the app, it > turned out to be a code issue. Glad you solved your problem. C

RE: Tomcat performance under low load

Thanks for the replies. Based on that, we did change the connectors to use executor threads. However, based on profiling the app, it turned out to be a code issue. Thanks again. From: vijay_me...@hotmail.com To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Tomcat performance under low load Date: Thu, 14

Re: Tomcat performance under low load

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vijay, On 10/13/2010 7:35 PM, Vijay Menon wrote: > We're scaling to satisfactory loads of 250 concurrent > requests serving pages in 0.5 seconds. Excellent (assuming that 0.5 seconds is acceptable to your team). > The other test scenario is where th

RE: Tomcat performance under low load

> From: Vijay Menon [mailto:vijay_me...@hotmail.com] > Subject: Tomcat performance under low load > The other test scenario is where the tomcat instance is kept > idle and a single request is sent in every 90 or so seconds. > In this case, the response takes about 8 seconds out o

Tomcat performance under low load

Hi all Thanks for reading this post. We are currently having 2 requirements that are opposites. The first requirement is performance under high loads and the other one is equivalent performance for 1 request. Our prod env currently uses Apache with mod_jk and ajp 1.3 to Tomcat 6.0.26 and jdk 1

Re: Tomcat performance tuning

Rujin, I Installed tomcat 5.5.20 version in my Windows 2008 server and the java version is Java 1.6.0.b105.We are using 2 Mbps Bandwidth Leased line.In tomcat we hosted around 5(five) application.When the no of seesion increases more than 1600 session the total application is slow and not able

Tomcat performance tuning

Support, I Installed tomcat 5.5.20 version in my Windows 2008 server and the java version is Java 1.6.0.b105.We are using 2 Mbps Bandwidth Leased line.In tomcat we hosted around 5(five) application.When the no of seesion increases more than 1600 session the total application is slow and not able

RE: Required Help in tomcat performance optimization.

> From: Harpreet singh Wadhwa [mailto:harpreetsingh.wad...@gmail.com] > Subject: Required Help in tomcat performance optimization. > > I want to optimize the performance of tomcat. You probably want to optimize the performance of your webapp first. > Can anyone please point to

Required Help in tomcat performance optimization.

Hi, I want to optimize the performance of tomcat. Can anyone please point to some docs/wiki/direct answer. Regards Harpreet - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h.

RE: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux

ate: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:35:07 -0400 > From: jhubbsl...@att.net > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux > > On 5/28/10 10:06 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > What about network configuration? Are both servers the

Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux

On 5/28/10 10:27 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote: Yes both are on the same network and same distance. If I limit it to 30 threads their behavior is the same. By this do you mean that the timing of both systems more closely match each other if you produce just 30 threads on each? As far as the ve

Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux

On 5/28/10 10:06 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: What about network configuration? Are both servers the same "distance" from you on the network? That's a reasonable question. The only thing I can add - and I wish I knew more about this than I do - is that Linux is configurable to a fault wh

RE: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux

> To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dave, > > On 5/28/2010 8:25 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote: > > If I run this test against a Windows hosted tomc

Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave, On 5/28/2010 8:25 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote: > If I run this test against a Windows hosted tomcat all threads > pretty much start at the same time and end within 10-20 msec of each > other. > > When I run the test against a linux hosted tomcat t

tomcat performance differences between windows and linux

I have created a simple web service which simulates 250 msec worth of work when called. When I test this service from jmeter I make a SOAP request with 50 threads. If I run this test against a Windows hosted tomcat all threads pretty much start at the same time and end within 10-20 msec of

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/httpd-vs.-Tomcat-performance-tp2802

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010/3/27 André Warnier : >> >> > Might this not also be worth preserving in the Tomcat FAQ/wiki ? > There is http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Performance_and_Monitoring

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

Hassan Schroeder wrote: Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up because I don't know if the author (a certain "mthomas") will mention it here.

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason, On 3/25/2010 3:01 AM, Jason Brittain wrote: > Chris: there are no units on your results numbers, and I'm not seeing > any procedure you used, nor any configurations you used, so I'm not sure how > to interpret the numbers. I'd be happy to give

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

On 25/03/2010 17:47, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > > On 3/24/2010 8:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote: >>> Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up >>> >>>

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark, On 3/24/2010 8:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote: >> Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up >> >>

  1   2   3   >