ave been 1-2msec or less if I could have adjusted the packets per
frame somehow (Jumbo frame maybe?).
Best Regards to all,
-Tony
Do'nt try this at home if you like sleep!
--- On Mon, 10/12/09, Tony Anecito wrote:
> From: Tony Anecito
> Subject: Re: Thanks For All The Help!!
> To: &qu
Hi Chris,
I understand but the tactical goal is improved performance. If it does not help
it is easy to undo.
Thanks again,
-Tony
--- On Mon, 10/12/09, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Subject: Re: Thanks For All The Help!!
> To: "Tomcat Users List&qu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 10/12/2009 2:01 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Yes you are correct no SSL. I thought I would give APR a try since it
> was recommended in general to use it for http. As you say it could
> not hurt.
The only thing it might hurt is simplicity: anot
Hi Chris,
Yes you are correct no SSL. I thought I would give APR a try since it was
recommended in general to use it for http. As you say it could not hurt.
Best Regards,
-Tony
--- On Mon, 10/12/09, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Subject: Re: Thanks For A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 10/12/2009 1:52 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Next step is to install APR and rerun tests and maybe do some more
> tuning jvm and maybe elsewhere for Tomcat.
I doubt you'll see any performance increase when adding APR to the mix
(no SSL, right?)
ep is to install APR and rerun tests and maybe do some more tuning jvm
and maybe elsewhere for Tomcat.
Goal is to see if I can get down to 1msec or less as measured at Java client
and/or using profiler to measure at Tomcat server.
Again thanks for all the help! I wanted to lighten up my archite