> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Support and development of versions
>
> It might not be, but it should not be.
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/compatibility.html
> and
> http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/compatibility.html
Other than enu
Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current status is available from:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions
What does RTC, for the process field stand for?
Review Then Commit. It means every patch must get at least 3 more
> -Original Message-
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 16:12
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Support and development of versions
>
> > From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Support and development of versions
>
> Could someone help me understand the differences between the servlet
> and JSP versions?
The servlet and JSP specs are the place to look. Each document includes
a se
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Current status is available from:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions
>
What does RTC, for the process field stand for?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
> >> the mid-to-long term.
> >
>
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
the mid-to-long term.
That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a
wasteland? I'll need to unde
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
the mid-to-long term.
That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a
wasteland? I'll need
> From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Support and development of versions
>
> Is 5.5 a wasteland?
It's not a wasteland, whereas 5.0 is. However, the most attention goes
to the current level, while 4.1 and 5.5 activity is pretty much limited
to
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
> the mid-to-long term.
That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a
wasteland? I'll need to understand the rationale behind
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
Hi,
So, I'm running an app which the development house say *has* to run on
4.1.31. I'm not especially happy about this, and will try running it
under 4.1.37, but the developers say they *might* be able to get it to
run under 5.5. I seem to recall a conversation in w
Hi,
So, I'm running an app which the development house say *has* to run on
4.1.31. I'm not especially happy about this, and will try running it
under 4.1.37, but the developers say they *might* be able to get it to
run under 5.5. I seem to recall a conversation in which I was told
that 5.5 isn't
12 matches
Mail list logo
