-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 10/29/2009 4:16 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
> More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing
> a little work in a language that is reasonably "close to the metal"
> gives an insight into how the machine actually works, w
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:30 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Warren Pace wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
>>>> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So
Warren Pace wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
judicious and parcimonious usage of sorted
2009/10/29 Caldarale, Charles R :
>> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
>> That's not even a "modern" stored-program computer!
>
> Just because it used relays as the logic elements?
Hmm. I started writing a response here along the lines of "because it
didn't keep the code in main memory", then
> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
> [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther
> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
>
> That's not even a "modern" stored-program computer!
Just because it used relays as the logic elements?
It
2009/10/29 Caldarale, Charles R :
> Univac 1004: 961 *6-bit* bytes of core memory, programmed via squids on a
> plugboard. Handled punch cards, paper tape, and printing; tape drive
> optional (we didn't have one). Had a tendency to throw cards all over the
> room if not handled properly.
>
>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
>> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
>>
>> As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
>> judicious and parcimonious us
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
>
> As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
> judicious and parcimonious usage of sorted data structures, on a
> computer with 16 Kb of RAM and punched
I was the happiest man in the world when they delivered our shiny new
System/34. No more punch cards!
--Original Message--
From: André Warnier
To: Tomcat Users List
ReplyTo: Tomcat Users List
ReplyTo: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
Sent: Oct 29, 2009 5:08
Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/10/28 Christopher Schultz :
Everybody ought to learn a little C at some point. It will make you
really appreciate a relatively clean language like Java.
ICL PLAN3 asembler, anyone? :-)
More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing
a little wo
2009/10/28 Christopher Schultz :
> Everybody ought to learn a little C at some point. It will make you
> really appreciate a relatively clean language like Java.
ICL PLAN3 asembler, anyone? :-)
More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing
a little work in a language that
I actually have worked on C but didn't read the line about bit mask. Sorry.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mohit,
>
> On 10/28/2009 2:29 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/28/2009 2:29 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
> the link http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
> it doesn't have option "7"
That's because 7 isn't a
Thanks. I couldn't find what option retry_options 7 in
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html is for.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 28.10.2009 19:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>> Would this work with 1.2.27?
>
> Remove the escalat
On 28.10.2009 19:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Would this work with 1.2.27?
Remove the escalation parameter, I guess that's the only 1.2.28 special
param.
> Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
> the link http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/refe
Thanks a lot!
Would this work with 1.2.27?
Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
the link http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
it doesn't have option "7"
Regarding ping_mode:
What happens when Cping returns error for ping_mode "C"? Does it
On 28.10.2009 17:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Based on what I have seen is that we often get HTTP code 502 and by
> increasing socket timeout those errors disappear. I am not sure why
> that happens.
>
> Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
> ok except the socket ti
Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
ok except the socket timeout piece and I should probably remove that?
Do I not recall Rainer already telling you that ?
-
To unsubscr
Based on what I have seen is that we often get HTTP code 502 and by
increasing socket timeout those errors disappear. I am not sure why
that happens.
Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
ok except the socket timeout piece and I should probably remove that?
Here i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/26/2009 6:40 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Christopher in one of his earlier replies mentioned that we don't have
> failover set. I am not sure why he said that because we have
> worker.list and also we have loadbalancer set in our
> worker.
On 26.10.2009 23:40, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> I read about timeouts but I still have following questions:
>
> 1. From 1.2.28 onwards, if I don't set the ping_mode then the request
> will still be sent to the BE node from workers.list even if that node
> is down?
Forwarding http requests to a node o
I read about timeouts but I still have following questions:
1. From 1.2.28 onwards, if I don't set the ping_mode then the request
will still be sent to the BE node from workers.list even if that node
is down?
2. Does socket_timeout mean how long the socket connection will be
kept open? So it actua
thanks I'll read that and let you know if I have any questions.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 26.10.2009 16:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>>> I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
>>> it's
On 26.10.2009 16:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
>> it's confusing in terms of which one should be used and which ones can
>> be left alone. We currently have following values, do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
> it's confusing in terms of which one should be used and which ones can
> be left alone. We currently have following values,
Apache 2.2.11
I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
it's confusing in terms of which one should be used and which ones can
be left alone. We currently have following values, do you see any
problem?
worker.host2533.type=ajp13
worker.host2533.port=8009
worker.host25
26 matches
Mail list logo
