Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On 10/1/07, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're not in full production, but have a dozen or so beta-test sites > that we'd rather not jerk around since they have already tolerated some > glitches during testing. A one-time change of bookmarks wouldn't seem that big a deal, considering

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread Ken Bowen
Would it be enough to replace ROOT/index.jsp with the following?: <% page contentType = "text/html" %> <% String redirectURL = "http://myserver:8081/SiteData/";; response.sendRedirect(redirectURL); %> -- Ken Bowen Pid wrote: David kerber wrote: I want my webapp to be the

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread David kerber
Hassan Schroeder wrote: On 10/1/07, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hassan Schroeder wrote: Can I set the root webapp to ALSO answer under the webapp's original name, so people who use a bookmark to the full app path won't get "not found" errors? I though I had to have the

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread Markus Schönhaber
David kerber wrote: > Can I set the root webapp to ALSO answer under the webapp's original > name, so people who use a bookmark to the full app path won't get "not > found" errors? I though I had to have the .war in both places: root > and its original place for that to work... Of course. Si

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On 10/1/07, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hassan Schroeder wrote: > Can I set the root webapp to ALSO answer under the webapp's original > name, so people who use a bookmark to the full app path won't get "not > found" errors? I though I had to have the .war in both places: root > an

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread David kerber
Hassan Schroeder wrote: On 10/1/07, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks, guys; I like the redirect idea a lot better than a second install that I'm likely to forget to update at some point. What "second install"? Rename the WAR file or directory; what could be simpler?

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On 10/1/07, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, guys; I like the redirect idea a lot better than a second > install that I'm likely to forget to update at some point. What "second install"? Rename the WAR file or directory; what could be simpler? -- Hassan Schroeder --

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread David kerber
Thanks, guys; I like the redirect idea a lot better than a second install that I'm likely to forget to update at some point. Pid wrote: David kerber wrote: I want my webapp to be the default application on my Tomcat 5.5 server, so that it will go to the app's login page even if they don't

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread Pid
David kerber wrote: > I want my webapp to be the default application on my Tomcat 5.5 server, > so that it will go to the app's login page even if they don't enter the > app name as part of the url. For example, normally my app is accessed at: > > http://myserver:8081/SiteData/Login.jsp > > I wan

Re: Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread Markus Schönhaber
David kerber schrieb: > I want my webapp to be the default application on my Tomcat 5.5 server, > so that it will go to the app's login page even if they don't enter the > app name as part of the url. For example, normally my app is accessed at: > > http://myserver:8081/SiteData/Login.jsp > >

Setting default webapp

2007-10-01 Thread David kerber
I want my webapp to be the default application on my Tomcat 5.5 server, so that it will go to the app's login page even if they don't enter the app name as part of the url. For example, normally my app is accessed at: http://myserver:8081/SiteData/Login.jsp I want them to get Login.jsp even if