RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-26 Thread behofmann
Chuck, Thank you again for your help and being a great resource! I'm sure I'll have other questions soon. Thanks again, Brandon Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > >> From: behofmann [mailto:behofm...@gmail.com] >> Subject: RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions w

RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-26 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: behofmann [mailto:behofm...@gmail.com] > Subject: RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same > Context > > Could you please point me to some documentation that explains > how the construct production#1.0 works? http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/c

RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-26 Thread behofmann
behofmann [mailto:behofm...@gmail.com] >> Subject: RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same >> Context >> >> specifically if the name would be >> "production#1.0" in context.xml. > > If you're talking about the path or docBase attribu

RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-26 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: behofmann [mailto:behofm...@gmail.com] > Subject: RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same > Context > > specifically if the name would be > "production#1.0" in context.xml. If you're talking about the path or docBase attributes of

RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-26 Thread behofmann
ail.com] >> Subject: Re: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same >> Context >> >> would the associated be called "production_1.0"? > > Not quite sure what you're asking, or where the underscore came from. The > element must be in an

RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-26 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: behofmann [mailto:behofm...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same > Context > > would the associated be called "production_1.0"? Not quite sure what you're asking, or where the underscore came from. The element m

Re: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-26 Thread behofmann
ng Tomcat 6.0.18. I don't want to recreate > this functionality if Tomcat already has it available. > > Thank you in advance for your help. > > Brandon > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Serving-Multiple-Application-Versions

RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-25 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: behofmann [mailto:behofm...@gmail.com] > Subject: RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same > Context > > My main objective is to have my client's URL not change > and have any redirection to a different version be > transparent to them. Whic

RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-25 Thread behofmann
ld have to experiment to see how that exactly works. Would a redirection filter only be sufficient? Thanks again for your input! Brandon Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > >> From: behofmann [mailto:behofm...@gmail.com] >> Subject: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the

RE: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-25 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: behofmann [mailto:behofm...@gmail.com] > Subject: Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context > > While designing this application, I would like the ability to serve > multiple application versions within the same context. Do you really want to do that?

Serving Multiple Application Versions within the same Context

2009-03-25 Thread behofmann
;m relatively new to configuring Tomcat 6.0.18. I don't want to recreate this functionality if Tomcat already has it available. Thank you in advance for your help. Brandon -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Serving-Multiple-Application-Versions-within-the-same-Context