On 23/11/2010 23:34, André Warnier wrote:
> Andrew Hole wrote:
>> I'm reading about domain directive in worker properties. I can setup
>> different workers to be in the same domain (p.e. a machine) and have
>> "domain
>> affinity". Do you have some idea how it really works?
>>
>
> No, but it kind
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> André,
>
> On 11/23/2010 10:27 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> > With the configuration below and your explanations, I suppose that there
> > is some kind o
Andrew Hole wrote:
I'm reading about domain directive in worker properties. I can setup
different workers to be in the same domain (p.e. a machine) and have "domain
affinity". Do you have some idea how it really works?
No, but it kind of sounds like what you want to achieve, doesn't it ?
You c
And regarding your question;
~Why can you not run all apps within one single JVM/Tomcat ?
Because we have a lot of web applications and we are using 32-bit JVM.
Thanks a lot
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Andrew Hole wrote:
> I'm reading about domain directive in worker properties. I can set
I'm reading about domain directive in worker properties. I can setup
different workers to be in the same domain (p.e. a machine) and have "domain
affinity". Do you have some idea how it really works?
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 11/23/2010 10:27 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> With the configuration below and your explanations, I suppose that there
> is some kind of load-balancing going on between the two machines.
> What is used at the front-end to load-balance ?
>
> A
With the configuration below and your explanations, I suppose that there is some kind of
load-balancing going on between the two machines.
What is used at the front-end to load-balance ?
An idea (for the moment vague) would be to use some intelligent front-end, which would
decide (maybe as Mark
On 23/11/2010 14:41, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 11/23/2010 5:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 23/11/2010 00:06, Andrew Hole wrote:
>>> There is a middleware-to-middleware connection between Tomcat A and Tomcat B
>>> using RMI (point-to-point protocol) and Tomcat A has in-memory data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 11/23/2010 5:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/11/2010 00:06, Andrew Hole wrote:
>> There is a middleware-to-middleware connection between Tomcat A and Tomcat B
>> using RMI (point-to-point protocol) and Tomcat A has in-memory data useful
>>
On 23/11/2010 00:06, Andrew Hole wrote:
> There is a middleware-to-middleware connection between Tomcat A and Tomcat B
> using RMI (point-to-point protocol) and Tomcat A has in-memory data useful
> to App3.
> The same aproach in the second server: applications in tomcat d have RMI
> communication t
There is a middleware-to-middleware connection between Tomcat A and Tomcat B
using RMI (point-to-point protocol) and Tomcat A has in-memory data useful
to App3.
The same aproach in the second server: applications in tomcat d have RMI
communication to tomcat c.
thanks
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:58
Andrew Hole wrote:
Sorry for the inconvenience. I sent the email with wrong content.
An example:
Machine 1:
Tomcat A
App1
App2
Tomcat B
App3
App4
Machine 2:
Tomcat C
App1
App2
Tomcat D
App3
App4
Using session affinity, if I make a request to App1 and the Tomcat A in
Machine 1 i
Sorry for the inconvenience. I sent the email with wrong content.
An example:
Machine 1:
Tomcat A
App1
App2
Tomcat B
App3
App4
Machine 2:
Tomcat C
App1
App2
Tomcat D
App3
App4
Using session affinity, if I make a request to App1 and the Tomcat A in
Machine 1 is selected. All the s
An example:
Machine 1:
Tomcat A
Tomcat B
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:05 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Andrew Hole wrote:
>
>> No... Session affinity (jvmRoute in JSESSION ID) implies sending to the
>> same
>> tomcat instance (same JVM), not for the same machine.
>>
>> I guess that I still don't ge
Andrew Hole wrote:
No... Session affinity (jvmRoute in JSESSION ID) implies sending to the same
tomcat instance (same JVM), not for the same machine.
I guess that I still don't get it.
The same Tomcat instance /is/, per definition, on the same machine.
Or do you want to send the request to a /
uration to define server affinity instead of
>> session affinity? Our architecture setup is based on multiple JVMs
>> (tomcat)
>> instances in each server (machine). The goal is to send all requests
>> (within
>> a session) from a client browser to the same machine. Is it
Andrew Hole wrote:
Hi guys!
There is any available configuration to define server affinity instead of
session affinity? Our architecture setup is based on multiple JVMs (tomcat)
instances in each server (machine). The goal is to send all requests (within
a session) from a client browser to the
> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:andremailingl...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Server affinity instead of session affinity
> The goal is to send all requests (within a session) from a
> client browser to the same machine. Is it possible to
> perform it using jvmRoute?
Can't you just se
Hi guys!
There is any available configuration to define server affinity instead of
session affinity? Our architecture setup is based on multiple JVMs (tomcat)
instances in each server (machine). The goal is to send all requests (within
a session) from a client browser to the same machine. Is it
19 matches
Mail list logo
