On 2/3/2012 11:22 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex,
On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
[snip]
OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
changing its content.
LMAO Tha
David kerber wrote:
On 2/3/2012 11:01 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 2/2/12 5:00 PM, André Warnier wrote:
The programming language could be called DarkEnergy, and the
documentation be written in DarkMatter (and it would always
include un
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex,
On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
[snip]
OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
changing its content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
Note that you coul
On 03/02/2012 16:02, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 2/3/12 6:12 AM, Pid wrote:
>> DarkEnergy[TM] compiles to bytecode presumably? Seems everyone &
>> their dog is inventing JVM languages, no reason why we can't. QLG
>> is a hard problem to solve, so I'd expect the syntax to be more
>>
On 2/3/2012 11:01 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 2/2/12 5:00 PM, André Warnier wrote:
The programming language could be called DarkEnergy, and the
documentation be written in DarkMatter (and it would always
include unwritten chapters, nam
On Feb 3, 2012, at 11:01 AM, "Christopher Schultz"
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> André,
>
> On 2/2/12 5:00 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>> The programming language could be called DarkEnergy, and the
>> documentation be written in DarkMatter (and it would always
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 2/3/12 6:12 AM, Pid wrote:
> DarkEnergy[TM] compiles to bytecode presumably? Seems everyone &
> their dog is inventing JVM languages, no reason why we can't. QLG
> is a hard problem to solve, so I'd expect the syntax to be more
> complex, th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 2/2/12 5:00 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> The programming language could be called DarkEnergy, and the
> documentation be written in DarkMatter (and it would always
> include unwritten chapters, named black holes). The language
> should conta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex,
On 2/2/12 7:29 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without
> changing its content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
>>> Note tha
Nah, just fork it off of FreeQuantumLoopGravity.
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Asking whether markets are efficient is like asking whether people are smart.
pgpqF1xStOMTh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 2/3/2012 6:12 AM, Pid wrote:
On 03/02/2012 07:55, André Warnier wrote:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: David Kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] Subject: Re:
Regarding compatibility
It will be open source, right?
Both open *and* closed source.
But you won't know which unti
On 03/02/2012 07:55, André Warnier wrote:
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: David Kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] Subject: Re:
>>> Regarding compatibility
>>
>>>>> It will be open source, right?
>>
>>>> Both open *and* closed s
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: David Kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Subject: Re: Regarding compatibility
It will be open source, right?
Both open *and* closed source.
But you won't know which until you download it and open the package...
Furry source...
Are we all goi
> From: David Kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
> Subject: Re: Regarding compatibility
> > > It will be open source, right?
> > Both open *and* closed source.
> But you won't know which until you download it and open the package...
Furry source...
Are we all
On 2/2/2012 6:32 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Donn Aiken wrote:
It will be open source, right?
Both open *and* closed source.
But you won't know which until you download it and open the package...
( Radioactive Isotope and Hammer Not Included. )
---
[snip]
> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
> >>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
> >>> content.
> >>
> >> LMAO That might be achievable.
> >>
> > Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned, by
> > having the response time be random. So you would e
On 2/2/2012 5:09 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Pid wrote:
On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Pid,
On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
content.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Donn Aiken wrote:
> It will be open source, right?
Both open *and* closed source.
( Radioactive Isotope and Hammer Not Included. )
--
Hassan Schroeder hassan.schroe...@gmail.com
http://about.me/hassanschroeder
twitter: @hassan
On Feb 2, 2012 5:01 PM, "André Warnier" wrote:
>
> Pid wrote:
>>
>> On 02/02/2012 15:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> On 2/2/12 7:50 AM, David kerber wrote:
On 2/2/2012 6:25 AM, Pid wrote:
>
> On 02/02/2012 10:27, bhawana rajpurohit wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>
Pid wrote:
On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Pid,
On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
Note that
Pid wrote:
On 02/02/2012 15:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
David,
On 2/2/12 7:50 AM, David kerber wrote:
On 2/2/2012 6:25 AM, Pid wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:27, bhawana rajpurohit wrote:
Hi,
This is to ask you that we have Apache 2.2.17 and tomcat
7.0.12.
Why not upgrade to Apache HTTPD 2.2.2
On 02/02/2012 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
>> We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
>> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
>
> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
> content.
LMAO That might be achievable.
p
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 2/2/12 10:25 AM, Pid wrote:
> We should start an Incubator wiki proposal page for
> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
content.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/M
On 02/02/2012 15:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> David,
>
> On 2/2/12 7:50 AM, David kerber wrote:
>> On 2/2/2012 6:25 AM, Pid wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2012 10:27, bhawana rajpurohit wrote:
Hi,
This is to ask you that we have Apache 2.2.17 and tomcat
7.0.12.
>>>
>>> Why not upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 2/2/12 7:50 AM, David kerber wrote:
> On 2/2/2012 6:25 AM, Pid wrote:
>> On 02/02/2012 10:27, bhawana rajpurohit wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is to ask you that we have Apache 2.2.17 and tomcat
>>> 7.0.12.
>>
>> Why not upgrade to Apache HT
bhawana rajpurohit wrote:
Hi,
This is to ask you that we have Apache 2.2.17 and tomcat 7.0.12.Kindy
tell us that whether they are compatible with vtier(virtual Tier)
architechture or not.
We don't know. Did you try it ?
(and check http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html)
On 2/2/2012 6:25 AM, Pid wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:27, bhawana rajpurohit wrote:
Hi,
This is to ask you that we have Apache 2.2.17 and tomcat 7.0.12.
Why not upgrade to Apache HTTPD 2.2.22 and Apache Tomcat 7.0.25?
Go on, it'll be fun!
Kindy tell us that whether they are compatible with vti
On 02/02/2012 10:27, bhawana rajpurohit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to ask you that we have Apache 2.2.17 and tomcat 7.0.12.
Why not upgrade to Apache HTTPD 2.2.22 and Apache Tomcat 7.0.25?
Go on, it'll be fun!
> Kindy tell us that whether they are compatible with vtier(virtual Tier)
> architecht
28 matches
Mail list logo
