-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 7/18/2011 11:33 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> The basic point is : mod_jk is not included in the RedHat standard
> Apache/Tomcat packages. But maybe this is just an oversight of
> RedHat, and maybe with a little nudge, they may be persuaded to
- Original Message -
> From: André Warnier
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 8:33 AM
> Subject: Re: RedHat and mod_jk
>
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Mar
Subject: Re: RedHat and mod_jk
Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mark,
>
> On 7/16/2011 12:50 AM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>> I've been successful in the past in getting permission to build
>> critical components locally. I
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 7/16/2011 12:50 AM, Mark Eggers wrote:
I've been successful in the past in getting permission to build
critical components locally. I've also been in environments where
this was strictly forbidden, even at the e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 7/16/2011 12:50 AM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> I've been successful in the past in getting permission to build
> critical components locally. I've also been in environments where
> this was strictly forbidden, even at the expense of not meeting
Hi,
On RedHat installation of mod_jk is as easy as:
1.
# yum install httpd httpd-devel gcc gcc-c++
2.
Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download the
source code (I'm giving an example with 1.2.31 version)
# wget
http://apache.mirror.aussiehq.net.au//tomcat/tomcat-connect
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thad,
>
> On 7/15/2011 9:59 PM, Thad Humphries wrote:
> > If you rely on RedHat, Novell, OpenSuSE, Unbuntu, etc. you can wait
> > for some things until
After some API reading I found getResourcePaths().
http://download.oracle.com/javaee/1.3/api/javax/servlet/ServletContext.html#getResourcePaths%28java.lang.String%29
Cheers
Darky
Hi there,
I am trying to list files and directories within an war-file i.e
images/summer2010 images/winter20
- Original Message -
> From: Christopher Schultz
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 9:09 PM
> Subject: Re: RedHat and mod_jk
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thad,
>
> On 7/15/2011 9:59 PM, Thad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thad,
On 7/15/2011 9:59 PM, Thad Humphries wrote:
> If you rely on RedHat, Novell, OpenSuSE, Unbuntu, etc. you can wait
> for some things until you are old and gray.
Sing it. We're stuck on MySQL 5.0 in production because of this very
fact. Sometimes
It's been my experience that it's best *not* to rely on the distro for any
mission critical piece of software. Either download the binary from a
trusted source or build it yourself. If you rely on RedHat, Novell,
OpenSuSE, Unbuntu, etc. you can wait for some things until you are old and
gray. Wors
- Original Message -
> From: Christopher Schultz
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 12:55 PM
> Subject: Re: RedHat and mod_jk
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mark,
>
> On 7/15/2011 2:54 PM, Mark Egg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 7/15/2011 2:54 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> I wonder if there's a problem building mod_jk with OpenJDK. I have
> Oracle's JDK installed here, so I don't know.
mod_jk does not have any Java components. The tomcat-connectors package
does have som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin,
On 7/15/2011 7:40 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
> not having (publicly available) apt/rpm package for at least one of
> the mod_jk distros will cause RH to lose market-share
RHEL is one of the only Linux distros that are supported by some managed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 7/15/2011 4:23 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> I would suppose that RedHat has good lawyers, and that they are
> "allowed" to do such a thing. Personally, I find this a bit
> "cheeky", specially from a company that presents itself as a champion
- Original Message -
> From: Rainer Jung
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 12:24 PM
> Subject: Re: RedHat and mod_jk
>
> On 15.07.2011 20:54, Mark Eggers wrote:
>> I find it a bit odd as well. It appears that mod_jk was never
On 15.07.2011 20:54, Mark Eggers wrote:
> I find it a bit odd as well. It appears that mod_jk was never really a part
> of Fedora. jpackage.org maintained an RPM for Apache 2.0 and RedHat platforms
> until about Fedora 3 or Fedora 4, and then it was dropped. I don't find a
> package in Fedora 14
I find it a bit odd as well. It appears that mod_jk was never really a part of
Fedora. jpackage.org maintained an RPM for Apache 2.0 and RedHat platforms
until about Fedora 3 or Fedora 4, and then it was dropped. I don't find a
package in Fedora 14, RHELS 4, or RHELS5.
I guess this could be ask
ire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:23:27 +0200
> From: a...@ice-sa.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: RedHat and mod_jk
>
>
Hi.
Recently, other people and myself were looking for a pre-packaged mod_jk binary for a
RedHat RHELS system.
As a result of some investigation (by Mark Eggers on one side, and an independent sysadmin
of my customer on the other side), things seem to boil down to (largely quoted) :
"
In th
20 matches
Mail list logo
