Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread mast
From: "Caldarale, Charles R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more Where exactly did you put the above? It should go in the section for the DefaultServlet of conf/web.xml (approximately between lines 71 and 82 in an unmodified one). i see i had put

RE: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: mast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more > than 48K in size > > i have put this in the web.xml of the server > > sendfileSize > -1 > Where exactly did you put the abov

Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread mast
What happens if you set it to -1? that's what i have try but i still get the same error i have put this in the web.xml of the server sendfileSize -1 the problem is the same with all type of file > 48K (i have try with a jpeg) --

RE: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: mast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more > than 48K in size > > I have exactly the same problem with a 5.5.17 server and > changing the sendfileSize doesn t seem to fix anything What happens if you set it t

Re: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread mast
ct: RE: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size Thanks for that. Solved the problem nicely. By the way, I just tested with a 78k static HTM

Re: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Christopher Schultz
Canadafest, > Hello! > > I am trying to enable some video clips files to be downloaded by > users, but unfortunately instead of downloading it opens up the > garbage text on the webpage, just like if u try to open a media file > in notepad or wordpad. #1: Don't hijack threads. Please post a new m

RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread CANADAFAST INC.
"Caldarale, Charles R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than > 48K in size > > Thanks for that. Solved the problem nicely. By the way, I just tested wit

(FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Alistair McDonald
Chuck, Thanks for that. Solved the problem nicely. Cheers, Alistair >> From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size >> >> Tomcat happily serves up pages up to 48K in size, but above >> that size it returns an error to the bro

RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size > > Tomcat happily serves up pages up to 48K in size, but above > that size it returns an error to the browser: There's an interesting 48k setting in conf/web.xml for the DefaultSe

RE: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than 48K in size

2006-10-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Alistair McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (FIXED) RE: tomcat can't serve HTML pages more than > 48K in size > > Thanks for that. Solved the problem nicely. By the way, I just tested with a 78k static HTML page on a near stock 5.5.20, and did not experi