static files
> From: swoodbury [mailto:swoodb...@att.net]
> Subject: Re: tomcat caching of static files
>
> So the only thing left as far as i can see is the tomcat
> server caching the file in memory and not noticing the
> timestamp change when the thread re-creates the file.
Or
> From: swoodbury [mailto:swoodb...@att.net]
> Subject: Re: tomcat caching of static files
>
> So the only thing left as far as i can see is the tomcat
> server caching the file in memory and not noticing the
> timestamp change when the thread re-creates the file.
Or some i
Are you sure it's Tomcat doing the caching? I've found that both Firefox
and IE will cache CGI, JSP, servlet, and other dynamic results.
yes, i'm approaching certain that it isn't a browser issue. If i delete the
static files and thus force the system to regen i get updated data, but the
ur
Are you sure it's Tomcat doing the caching? I've found that both Firefox
and IE will cache CGI, JSP, servlet, and other dynamic results. This has
been true going back to when the old Mozilla 1.x had a preference for
*never* caching.
For GET calls were the results underlying content might change
