Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2007-01-02 Thread Peter Coppens
t; From: "Hassan Schroeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" > Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 2:39 PM > Subject: Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy > load > > >> On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens <[EMAIL

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Martin Gainty
; To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 2:39 PM Subject: Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load > On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That said, I am baffled by the fact that some connections take >15

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Coppens
>Are you referring to MySQL connection setup time? Or query time? Connection time (using a dbcp pool) >Either way, it certainly doesn't sound like a Tomcat problem... :-) Absolutely agree. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/session-getId-changes-during-doGet-invocation-under

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That said, I am baffled by the fact that some connections take >15minutes. Are you referring to MySQL connection setup time? Or query time? Either way, it certainly doesn't sound like a Tomcat problem... :-) -- Hassan Schroeder ---

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Coppens
rtin-- >> >> > >> >> >> --- >> >> > This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for >> the >> >> > use of the individual or entity to which it i

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread David Smith
PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:31 AM Subject: Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load Do I understand it right, that you made it a reproduceable testcase? If so, can we have a look on it? thank you Leon On

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Leon Rosenberg
-- >> > Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont >> annexées, >> > le cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des >> > renseignements de caractère privé ou confident

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Coppens
e au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des >> > renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas >> le >> > destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement >> > interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le r

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Leon Rosenberg
stribuer ou de le reproduire. > - Original Message - > From: "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:31 AM > Subject: Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy > lo

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-30 Thread Peter Coppens
rivé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le > destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement > interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. > - Original Message - > From: "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Martin Gainty
signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:31 AM Subject: Re: session#getId changes

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Peter Coppens
Unfortunately I have no repro yet. If I succeed in building one, I will most certainly post it. Thanks for all your help, Peter Leon Rosenberg-3 wrote: > > Do I understand it right, that you made it a reproduceable testcase? > If so, can we have a look on it? > > thank you > Leon > > On 12/

RE: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Tim Lucia
> -Original Message- > From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:25 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy > load > > > From: Peter Coppens [mailto:[E

Re: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Leon Rosenberg
Do I understand it right, that you made it a reproduceable testcase? If so, can we have a look on it? thank you Leon On 12/29/06, Peter Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Chuck. I have done some further research and I have the impression that there is some kind of race condition where

RE: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-29 Thread Peter Coppens
Thanks Chuck. I have done some further research and I have the impression that there is some kind of race condition where a session that is being removed because of a timeout is also handling requests. The loggings indicate that a session is destroyed but then nevertheless a doGet is invoked w

RE: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under heavy load

2006-12-28 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Peter Coppens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: session#getId changes during doGet invocation under > heavy load > > THe problem I run into is that, under heavy load, during the > doGet invocation for the login request the session attached > to the request is changed by some other thr