On 27/02/2012 22:23, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 28/02/12 12:14 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> On 2/26/12 11:29 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>>> From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:amania...@apache.org] Subject:
>>>>> Re: parallel de
On 28/02/12 12:14 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/26/12 11:29 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:amania...@apache.org] Subject:
Re: parallel deployment: multiple applications responding
What happens if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/26/12 11:29 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:amania...@apache.org] Subject:
>> Re: parallel deployment: multiple applications responding
>
>> What happens if our application defi
> From: Aristedes Maniatis [mailto:amania...@apache.org]
> Subject: Re: parallel deployment: multiple applications responding
> What happens if our application defines a static class or
> other resource?
Not sure what you mean by "static class", unless you're r
On 27/02/12 2:12 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
It would be nice if it showed as "disabled" (to use the mod_jk
terminology for an instance which is running but gets no new
sessions).
It's just a coincidence that no new sessions are being created --
because sessionless requests /should/ be sen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aristedes,
On 2/23/12 4:29 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> Given that we've definitely seen this happen with our sessionless
> application, I'm not sure that will help us much. For our other
> apps which have sessions, what happens if the incoming co
On 23/02/12 7:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/02/2012 06:51, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
We've been using parallel deployment for some time now with tomcat
7.0.25. For the most part the parallel deployment is a really nice idea,
particularly because we don't have sessions serialised and clustered
On 23/02/2012 06:51, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> We've been using parallel deployment for some time now with tomcat
> 7.0.25. For the most part the parallel deployment is a really nice idea,
> particularly because we don't have sessions serialised and clustered
> across all running instances.
>
>
