On 11.06.2010 20:06, LES wrote:
I only added socket_timeout in after looking at the included file in 1.2.30.
I was hoping that there was something in that file that I was missing.
I attached the log files that you asked for. Looking through them, I don't
see any notable increases in response ti
I only added socket_timeout in after looking at the included file in 1.2.30.
I was hoping that there was something in that file that I was missing.
I attached the log files that you asked for. Looking through them, I don't
see any notable increases in response times. This is a system that is no
Ok, let me see if I can correlate the various logs and I will post them later
today. Thanx for the help.
LES
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
>
> On 11.06.2010 16:28, LES wrote:
>>
>> Well, your suggested changes worked...until today. It was absolutely
>> rock
>> solid. Then, the last two days, with no
On 11.06.2010 16:28, LES wrote:
Well, your suggested changes worked...until today. It was absolutely rock
solid. Then, the last two days, with no load I started receiving errno=110
again. It didn't last all day, only a couple of hours yesterday and a
couple today. I have added a socket timeo
Well, your suggested changes worked...until today. It was absolutely rock
solid. Then, the last two days, with no load I started receiving errno=110
again. It didn't last all day, only a couple of hours yesterday and a
couple today. I have added a socket timeout and am trying to track down any
On 25.05.2010 14:48, LES wrote:
I can't believe I missed the millisecond thing. :)
No problem, it's our fault not using consistent time units. The latest
1.2.30 has a useful default configuration in the src tarball. But yours
looks good too.
Regards,
Rainer
---
Thank you for the help. You spend a great deal of time help folks on here
(as evidenced by the absurd number of times you have answered questions like
this :))...and it is appreciated.
I can't believe I missed the millisecond thing. :)
I'll check the log and the dump for the individual problems
On 24.05.2010 23:36, LES wrote:
I am having some trouble keeping a mod_jk setup stable. At this point, I
feel like I am too far into trial and error mode and would like some help
figuring out how to identify the problem.
My current setup involves, two linux (RHEL 5) server each running two tom
