daneturner schrieb:
>
> Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
>> Short answer for your question:
>>
>> the two lines you tried to use as a distance configuration both have
>> typos:
>>
>>> workers.localhost.distance=10
>>> workers.localhost.distance=20
>> workers -> worker
>> localhost -> ritin (once)
>>
>
> Ouch
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
>
> Short answer for your question:
>
> the two lines you tried to use as a distance configuration both have
> typos:
>
>> workers.localhost.distance=10
>> workers.localhost.distance=20
>
> workers -> worker
> localhost -> ritin (once)
>
Ouch. How stupid.
Thanks for t
Short answer for your question:
the two lines you tried to use as a distance configuration both have typos:
> workers.localhost.distance=10
> workers.localhost.distance=20
workers -> worker
localhost -> ritin (once)
I just did a quick test with 1.2.20 (there should no be change wrt.
distance be
I just tested with mod_jk 1.2.19 and it still seems as though the distance
parameter is being ignored. Output from the status/monitor.page shows
mod_jk alternating between tomcats with different distance values in
workers.properties.
How can I troubleshoot this further?
Here's my workers.prop
The new attribute distance will help you. It was first implemented for
version 1.2.16, which is in the process of being released (see my other
answer).
Please test and let us know your results.
thuss2 schrieb:
> We have 10 web servers with Tomcat's running on them and a mod_jk
> configuration to
We just now tagged 1.2.16. A release candidate is available. Please have
a look at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=115194553720728&w=2
Test results are welcome. If no new problems will be found, the release
vote will procees starting Friday.
The final release will be announced on th
On 6/22/06, Per Johnsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is 1.2.16 avaiable for download somewhere?
Not that I know of, you have to grab the source from SVN.
Found this:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20060505.html
I wonder how that got there!
-Dave
--
Hi!
Is 1.2.16 avaiable for download somewhere?
Found this:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20060505.html
Regards Per
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 21 juni 2006 21:14
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk failover and
Mladen Turk wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only
took 0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that?
Recent mod_jk versions can take True/False instead 1/0 just
as an convenience method.
instead or "as well"
That explains it, thanks. I've just set the lbfactor extremely high on the
localhost in the interim to get mod_jk to prefer it over remote tomcats.
-Todd
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4980806
Sent from the Tomcat -
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only took
0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that?
Recent mod_jk versions can take True/False instead 1/0 just
as an convenience method.
Also the 'distance' param will be suppor
Filip, we're not using sessions so we don't need sessions affinity, but if we
did we'd use session replication rather than sticky sessions. The sticky
option does accept true/false according to the documentation
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/workers.html . I think that's
all unrel
you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only took
0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that?
Filip
thuss2 wrote:
We have 10 web servers with Tomcat's running on them and a mod_jk
configuration to prefer the tomcat on localhost and only failover to ano
13 matches
Mail list logo
