Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-18 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Chris, On 17.06.2009 19:15, Christopher Schultz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Rainer, > > On 6/17/2009 3:45 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Thanks, added as r785498 in a slightly different wording. Will be part >> of 1.2.29. > > Does that mean that the website has to

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rainer, On 6/17/2009 3:45 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Thanks, added as r785498 in a slightly different wording. Will be part > of 1.2.29. Does that mean that the website has to wait for 1.2.29 to be released for an update? It would be great if the doc u

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-17 Thread Rainer Jung
On 17.06.2009 00:09, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Rainer, > > On 6/16/2009 1:05 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Would you mind to provide some sentences or corrections for specific >> docs pages? > > How about adding: > > " > Rule extensions were added in mod_jk 1.2.17. If you would like to use > rule

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-17 Thread Tsirkin Evgeny
Actually i guess "Rule extensions were added in mod_jk 1.2.17." Is probably enough .Just make it underlined or bold. Evgeny On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Rainer, > > On 6/16/2009 1

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-16 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rainer, On 6/16/2009 1:05 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Would you mind to provide some sentences or corrections for specific > docs pages? How about adding: " Rule extensions were added in mod_jk 1.2.17. If you would like to use rule ("mount"?) extension

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-16 Thread Rainer Jung
On 16.06.2009 17:28, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote: > Thanks > It worked > If just it would be mentioned in documention it would save me several ours > of > debugging > Should i report a bug or i have missed it? Would you mind to provide some sentences or corrections for specific docs pages? Regards, Rai

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-16 Thread Tsirkin Evgeny
Thanks It worked If just it would be mentioned in documention it would save me several ours of debugging Should i report a bug or i have missed it? Evgeny On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > >> On 11.06.2009 14:26, Tsi

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-12 Thread Tsirkin Evgeny
Thanks I will try this Evgeny On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 11.06.2009 14:26, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote: > > Hi list! > > I have mod_jk 1.2.26 configured and working fine. > > However i want to set a special reply_timeout for a special url , > > i am getting strange errors i

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.06.2009 14:26, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote: > Hi list! > I have mod_jk 1.2.26 configured and working fine. > However i want to set a special reply_timeout for a special url , > i am getting strange errors in log and the rule is ignored . > Once i add this line: > /dataj_mid/controller/finance/*=dat

Re: mod_jk does not recognize extension

2009-06-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Evgeny, On 6/11/2009 8:26 AM, Tsirkin Evgeny wrote: > Once i add this line: > /dataj_mid/controller/finance/*=dataj_mid;reply_timeout=12 > (see the full config below) [snip] > I am getting in jk log this: > jk_handler::mod_jk.c (2372): Could no