Re: mod_jk and tomcat virtual hosts not connecting

Hi Moritz, Try adding: jira.example.com www.jira.example.com To the server.xml inside the Best Regards, Brett -Original Message- From: Moritz Winter [mailto:moritz.a.win...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 7:11 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org

RE: mod_jk and tomcat virtual hosts not connecting

Try this pdf , it might help. IT seems to be you are trying complex configuration, the simple configuration would be example.com/jira If you want simple configuration follow the attachment. -Original Message- From: Moritz Winter [mailto:moritz.a.win...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: mod_jk and tomcat virtual hosts not connecting

Hi Felix, youre absolutely right and it works like a charm, thank you so much!! Vielen Dank ;-) Btw. the www prefix is just working fine if I add the alias to the tomcat server.xml! Greetings! Am 27.07.2010 17:55, schrieb Felix Schumacher: Hi Moritz, Am Dienstag, den 27.07.2010, 15:40 +

Re: mod_jk and tomcat virtual hosts not connecting

Hi Moritz, Am Dienstag, den 27.07.2010, 15:40 +0200 schrieb Moritz Winter: > My issue is with the mod_jk plugin. I want to redirect my subdomain > requests jira.example.com to a tomcat 6 virtual host called jiraapp. If > I call the subdomain jira.example.com Im always getting the default > tom

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

Thank you all for helping, I found the issue was related to SELinux, which simply needs to be disabled or altered (I just disabled it - and everything started to work) -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky - To start a new topic, e-mail: users

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:07:18AM -0400, David Smith wrote: >> What does the connector for port 8009 look like in your server.xml? >> Does it specify protcol="AJP/1.3"? > > port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" > acceptCount="10" debug="0" connec

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:56:41AM -0400, David Smith wrote: > Could be. Software like Symantec Client Firewall tend to operate per > application. You'd get access, but maybe apache httpd was configured to > be denied access. There is no firewall installed at all. And su -m apache -c 'telne

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

Could be. Software like Symantec Client Firewall tend to operate per application. You'd get access, but maybe apache httpd was configured to be denied access. --David Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: I found error code 13 is ./asm/errno.h:#define EACCES 13 /* Permission denied *

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

I found error code 13 is ./asm/errno.h:#define EACCES 13 /* Permission denied */ could tha mean mod_jk simply isn't allowed to connect to port 8009? -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

I upgraded to mod_jk 1.2.18 and still face the same error: [Mon Aug 28 22:45:04 2006] [25415:26304] [debug] map_uri_to_worker::jk_uri_worker_map.c (520): Attempting to map context URI '/user/*' [Mon Aug 2

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:13:55AM -0400, Steve Ochani wrote: > > tcpdump shows me that there is NO attemts to make connection to host > > 127.0.0.1 and port 8009 from within mod_jk, but if I do telnet > > 127.0.0.1 8009 - it works fine. > > > > Really strange > > > > Operating system is Fedora c

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

On 28 Aug 2006 at 17:01, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > tcpdump shows me that there is NO attemts to make connection to host > 127.0.0.1 and port 8009 from within mod_jk, but if I do telnet > 127.0.0.1 8009 - it works fine. > > Really strange > > Operating system is Fedora core 4, > and installe

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:07:18AM -0400, David Smith wrote: > What does the connector for port 8009 look like in your server.xml? > Does it specify protcol="AJP/1.3"? it's tomcat 4.1.xx -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky - To start a

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

What does the connector for port 8009 look like in your server.xml? Does it specify protcol="AJP/1.3"? --David Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: Hello! I'm trying to move Tomcat with it's web-applications from one server to another, and I facing weird problem: I copied working configurations for

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

tcpdump shows me that there is NO attemts to make connection to host 127.0.0.1 and port 8009 from within mod_jk, but if I do telnet 127.0.0.1 8009 - it works fine. Really strange Operating system is Fedora core 4, and installed software: jdk1.5.0_07, mod_jk-1.2.6-3jpp_4fc, httpd-2.0.54-10.4 --

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat

netstat -lp | grep 8009 gives me tcp0 0 *:8009 *:* LISTEN 17119/java -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c