Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-20 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 3/20/2009 8:02 AM, André Cruz wrote: > I'm running apache 2.2.9, mod_jk 1.2.27 and tomcat 6.0.18 and I get this > problem > as well: > > GET /shibboleth-idp/SSO HTTP/1.1 [snip] > HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily > Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-20 Thread André Cruz
Rainer Jung kippdata.de> writes: > On 09.03.2009 18:07, Anthony J. Biacco wrote: > > Download the latest, configure, make, make install, check for > > new/deprecated directives in the jk docs, modify configs accordingly, > > reload apache. I'm running apache 2.2.9, mod_jk 1.2.27 and tomcat 6.0.1

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-09 Thread Rainer Jung
On 09.03.2009 18:07, Anthony J. Biacco wrote: Download the latest, configure, make, make install, check for new/deprecated directives in the jk docs, modify configs accordingly, reload apache. +1 Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-ma

RE: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-09 Thread Anthony J. Biacco
://www.formatdynamics.com -Original Message- From: Eqbal [mailto:eqb...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 Thanks for the tip Rainer. The version I have is 1.2.6-dev So in order to update to a newer version, do I just download the latest and copy

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-09 Thread Eqbal
ules file is (you can learn that from looking at the LoadMofdule line for mod_jk), you can use strings mod_jk.so | fgrep 1.2. Regards, Rainer > -Original Message- From: Eqbal Sent: > Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:13 PM To: Tomcat Users > List Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 > >

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-08 Thread Rainer Jung
learn that from looking at the LoadMofdule line for mod_jk), you can use strings mod_jk.so | fgrep 1.2. Regards, Rainer -Original Message- From: Eqbal Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:13 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 Yes I tested on newer version as well, but

RE: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-07 Thread Anthony J. Biacco
Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 Yes I tested on newer version as well, but could not reproduce it there. The extra bytes are not content and they are always the same regardless of what resource is requested. How do I find the mod_jk version? It came with the suse distribution. I tried

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-07 Thread Eqbal
t the version. - Original Message From: Len Popp To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2009 9:18:49 AM Subject: Re: mod_jk and 304 I'm not seeing that problem on my system, but I'm running newer versions (httpd 2.2.9 and Tomcat 6.0.18). I do recall seeing some strang

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-07 Thread Len Popp
I'm not seeing that problem on my system, but I'm running newer versions (httpd 2.2.9 and Tomcat 6.0.18). I do recall seeing some strange 304 responses with 2.0 & 5.5, but it was a while ago and I don't remember if the problem was extra bytes in the response. What version of mod_jk are you using?

Re: mod_jk and 304

2009-03-06 Thread Eqbal
Some additional info I found on this: It seems that combination of mod_deflate and mod_jk is causing the issue. I have mod_deflate enabled on apache for css, js files etc. I tried getting a css file directly from apache httpd and it didn't have any problems, but if the css and js files are in t