RE: mod_jk / AJP and compression

2011-04-01 Thread Holle, Jess
AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk / AJP and compression On 01/04/2011 11:15, John Baker wrote: > Hello, > > The Tomcat AJP Connector does not support compression. Why has this been > ommitted? Because the link between Tomcat and reverse proxy will nearly always have s

Re: mod_jk / AJP and compression

2011-04-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John, On 4/1/2011 6:45 AM, John Baker wrote: > In general, that's true. However, for high performance applications > measuring results in milliseconds - ie noting that a request with > compression takes 60ms and without takes 120ms - it's an issue. An

Re: mod_jk / AJP and compression

2011-04-01 Thread John Baker
Mark, In general, that's true. However, for high performance applications measuring results in milliseconds - ie noting that a request with compression takes 60ms and without takes 120ms - it's an issue. And it seems so easy to fix by putting compression into the Tomcat AJP connector. Given it's a

Re: mod_jk / AJP and compression

2011-04-01 Thread Mark Thomas
On 01/04/2011 11:15, John Baker wrote: > Hello, > > The Tomcat AJP Connector does not support compression. Why has this been > ommitted? Because the link between Tomcat and reverse proxy will nearly always have significantly more capacity than the link between the client and the reverse proxy. Ad