On 12/08/2024 19:54, Holle, Jess wrote:
I have mod_jk load balancing over several back-end Java processes which embed
Tomcat.
When I Ctrl-C one of those processes, a server-sent-event response stream
(which has already sent a number of events) does not end from a client
perspective. Rather t
Jess,
On 8/12/24 14:54, Holle, Jess wrote:
I have mod_jk load balancing over several back-end Java processes which embed
Tomcat.
When I Ctrl-C one of those processes, a server-sent-event response stream
(which has already sent a number of events) does not end from a client
perspective. Rath
> Hi Rainer/Simon - I've just had another look at this. With no
> application running (IOW, all Java processes killed), I see this
> behaviour:
Sorry, I was confused because I thought we're talking about files from
Tomcat and not from Apache/mod_jk.
Regards,
Simon
>
> # systemctl start apache2
Hi Rainer/Simon - I've just had another look at this. With no
application running (IOW, all Java processes killed), I see this behaviour:
# systemctl start apache2
This create a number of apache2 processes (generally 7). 2 new mod_jk
files are created, corresponding to the apache2 process wit
Hi,
> Hi - I'm running mod_jk with an Apache front-end, and I'm having an
> issue with the JkShmFile files.
>
> Every time Apache restarts mod_jk creates two new files
> (jk-runtime-status.PID and jk-runtime-status.PID.lock). These are never
> cleaned up; the log directory simply fills up with the
Hi there,
Am 19.12.23 um 18:05 schrieb EML:
Hi - I'm running mod_jk with an Apache front-end, and I'm having an
issue with the JkShmFile files.
Every time Apache restarts mod_jk creates two new files
(jk-runtime-status.PID and jk-runtime-status.PID.lock). These are never
cleaned up; the log
Martin,
On 7/3/23 04:47, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
On 6/29/23 17:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
Since I try to push people into mod_proxy, I am hesitant to implement
more and more features which keep people from switching ;)
Hi Rainer,
so, what do you suggest for the mod_jk retirement?
mod_proxy
: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] Is it possible to set the value of a specific attribute
via
HTTP?
Rainer,
On 6/29/23 17:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Chris,
Am 29.06.23 um 15:00 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
All,
I've been using mod_jk forever and have some tools[1][2] to check
On 6/29/23 17:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> > Since I try to push people into mod_proxy, I am hesitant to implement
> > more and more features which keep people from switching ;)
>
>
Hi Rainer,
so, what do you suggest for the mod_jk retirement?
mod_proxy+mod_proxy_ajp, or just proxy to the HTTPS por
nal Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2023 2:19 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [mod_jk] Is it possible to set the value of a specific attribute
> via
> HTTP?
>
> Rainer,
>
> On 6/29/23 17:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
> >
Rainer,
On 6/29/23 17:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Chris,
Am 29.06.23 um 15:00 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
All,
I've been using mod_jk forever and have some tools[1][2] to check on
the status of a worker and change its state using the status worker.
One of the samples I check is the "errors"
Hi Chris,
Am 29.06.23 um 15:00 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
All,
I've been using mod_jk forever and have some tools[1][2] to check on the
status of a worker and change its state using the status worker.
One of the samples I check is the "errors" count and if it's above 0
then I report an er
.
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List ;
jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID
Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy
Jon,
On 12/6/22 16:22, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
What, pray tell, is an enc
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:54 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List ;
> jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID
> Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy
>
> Jon,
>
> On 12/6/22 16:22, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
> > What, pray tell, is an encrypted AJP connection?
hultz
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 3:01 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy
Jon,
On 12/6/22 12:36, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
IMHO, switching to mod_proxy, and using it over SSL, is by far better than
using mod_jk or mod_ajp, primarily as mod_
chultz
> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 3:01 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mod_JK vs Mod_Proxy
>
> Jon,
>
> On 12/6/22 12:36, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
> > IMHO, switching to mod_proxy, and using it over SSL, is by far better than
>
Jon,
On 12/6/22 12:36, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
IMHO, switching to mod_proxy, and using it over SSL, is by far better than using mod_jk
or mod_ajp, primarily as mod_proxy allows for secure proxy connection, whereas mod_jk and
mod_ajp aren't "secure" as they are not encrypte
essage in error, please advise
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for
your cooperation.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 11:21 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List ; Mark H. Wood
>
> Subject:
Mark,
On 12/6/22 08:48, Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:37:59PM -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 12/5/22 15:03, Cathy Spears wrote:
Using Tomcat 8.5 and 9.0 with 32-bit Apache 2.4 and mod_jk. Are there
benefits to using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk? Also, is there a
planned e
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:37:59PM -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> On 12/5/22 15:03, Cathy Spears wrote:
> > Using Tomcat 8.5 and 9.0 with 32-bit Apache 2.4 and mod_jk. Are there
> > benefits to using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk? Also, is there a
> > planned end of life for mod_jk or will it co
Cathy,
On 12/5/22 15:03, Cathy Spears wrote:
Using Tomcat 8.5 and 9.0 with 32-bit Apache 2.4 and mod_jk. Are there
benefits to using mod_proxy instead of mod_jk? Also, is there a
planned end of life for mod_jk or will it continue to be supported
for now?
Hopefully this will be helpful:
https:/
Hi,
i created a bugzilla entry
(https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65901) and included a
first attempt to patch this issue.
Am 12.02.2022 um 14:24 schrieb Stefan Mayr:
Hello Tomcat users,
this week we were debugging a strange connection issue which I tracked
down to an interfer
body although it should not (at least i
think mod_jk is somehow responsible for that)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stefan Mayr
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Februar 2022 23:07
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_jk interference with ErrorDocument/Alias on HEAD request
Hello again,
a
Hello again,
a self-compiled mod_jk 1.2.48 shows the same issue.
Am 13.02.2022 um 18:37 schrieb Stefan Mayr:
Hi,
looking at the source code
https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/blob/main/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c#L2954#L2973
I did some more testing:
Variant 1: JkMount /demo/* ajp13
Hi,
looking at the source code
https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/blob/main/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c#L2954#L2973
I did some more testing:
Variant 1: JkMount /demo/* ajp13_worker;use_server_errors=401
Variant 2: JkMount /demo/* ajp13_worker
ignoring what variant 2 changes for regul
Hi Thomas,
Am 13.02.2022 um 17:27 schrieb Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH):
Hello,
maybe you can try to set an environment variable which skips interpreting the
content-length:
https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/apache.html#Advanced%20Environment%20Variables
--> JK_IGNORE_CL
Brian,
On 10/28/20 21:24, Paquin, Brian wrote:
Chris,
On Oct 27, 2020, at 12:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
Brian
On 10/26/20 15:33, Paquin, Brian wrote:
I’m trying to build httpd and mod_jk for the first time on a macOS 10.15.7 box.
XCode 12.1 is installed and I was able to compile O
Chris,
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 12:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> Brian
>
> On 10/26/20 15:33, Paquin, Brian wrote:
>> I’m trying to build httpd and mod_jk for the first time on a macOS 10.15.7
>> box. XCode 12.1 is installed and I was able to compile OpenSSL 1.1.1g.
>> I got an error “
Brian
On 10/26/20 15:33, Paquin, Brian wrote:
I’m trying to build httpd and mod_jk for the first time on a macOS 10.15.7 box.
XCode 12.1 is installed and I was able to compile OpenSSL 1.1.1g.
I got an error “Can not determine the proper size for pid_t” when compiling
httpd (v2.4.46) with inclu
Il giorno ven, 29/05/2020 alle 14.09 -0400, Christopher Schultz ha
scritto:
> Giuseppe,
>
> On 5/29/20 11:57, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> > [...]
> > misconfigured machines and failed with 404 errors. From what I
> > understood, the mod_jk protocol only allows to check it tomcat is
> > alive. Is it po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Giuseppe,
On 5/29/20 11:57, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Hello,I have an apache httpd with mod_jk that load balance
> requests among two different tomcat servers.Today, one of the
> tomcat servers has been rebooted and tomcat could not deploy the
> appli
Am 22.10.2018 um 00:53 schrieb Jerry Malcolm:
On 10/21/2018 3:17 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
We provide the Windows binaries because the build process is more
involved, most users don't have the necessary toolchain easily
available and we only need to provide one binary for all Windows
platforms
Am 22.10.2018 um 00:43 schrieb Jerry Malcolm:
On 10/21/2018 7:27 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Plus:
mod_http2 uses additional threads per Apache httpd process. Look for
H2Workers, H2MinWorkers and H2MaxWorkers in the mod_http2 docs. By
default it seems you get ThreadsPerChild normal http worker thr
On 10/21/2018 3:17 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
We provide the Windows binaries because the build process is more involved,
most users don't have the necessary toolchain easily available and we only
need to provide one binary for all Windows platforms (ok we provide several
binaries with different
On 10/21/2018 7:27 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Plus:
mod_http2 uses additional threads per Apache httpd process. Look for
H2Workers, H2MinWorkers and H2MaxWorkers in the mod_http2 docs. By
default it seems you get ThreadsPerChild normal http worker threads
plus ThreadsPerChild HTTP/2 worker thread
On 10/21/2018 3:17 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
We need to see the configuration for:
- httpd mpm / threads / processes
- workers.proprties
- Tomcat's AJP connector
Mark
I'm not sure where to find httpd mpm / threads / processes config.
Nothing like that in my httpd.conf
--- workers.proper
Am 21.10.2018 um 10:17 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On October 21, 2018 7:38:25 AM UTC, Greg Huber wrote:
So I'm using the 2016 1.2.40 version.
Think you have to build mod_jk to use the latest and greatest,
Correct.
We stopped providing binary builds for anything other than Windows because
there
On October 21, 2018 7:38:25 AM UTC, Greg Huber wrote:
>> So I'm using the 2016 1.2.40 version.
>
>Think you have to build mod_jk to use the latest and greatest,
Correct.
We stopped providing binary builds for anything other than Windows because
there were just too many combinations. And it is r
> So I'm using the 2016 1.2.40 version.
Think you have to build mod_jk to use the latest and greatest, this is what
I have in my notes (also from the website docs):
mod_jk.so build
yum install httpd-devel
download tomcat-connectors-x.x.xx-src.tar.gz
extract and cd into the native fold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Rainer,
On 7/23/18 6:01 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Am 20.07.2018 um 16:29 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I've got a lb worker with two balanced nodes. One of the nodes
Hi Chris,
Am 20.07.2018 um 16:29 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I've got a lb worker with two balanced nodes. One of the nodes has a
non-zero value for the "Err" (errors) field, but there is a blank
entry for the "LE" (last error timestamp) fi
--Original Message-
>From: i...@flyingfischer.ch [mailto:i...@flyingfischer.ch]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 12:52 PM
>To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>Subject: Re: mod_jk: Forwarding URLs containing escaped slashes (e.g. for REST
>services) fail with syntactical-wrong double-
>escapin
> Hi all,
>
> I have problems to pass (REST-) URLs containing escaped slashes ('%2F') in
> path elements using the Apache httpd and mod_jk to the application server
> (in fact not Tomcat, but Wildfy. But this is of no matter, here).
>
> This kind of URL may be accepted by the httpd using th
Am 23.03.2018 um 11:19 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
Hi Rainer,
so basically I took the Apache path and ended up with the following brute
force method:
RewriteCond "%{REQUEST_METHOD}" "GET"
RewriteRule ^/xxx/facelets/logon.xhtml$ - [E=login_jsid:%{HTTP_COOKIE}]
CustomLog "/opt/xxx/apache2/logs/lo
Hi Rainer,
so basically I took the Apache path and ended up with the following brute
force method:
RewriteCond "%{REQUEST_METHOD}" "GET"
RewriteRule ^/xxx/facelets/logon.xhtml$ - [E=login_jsid:%{HTTP_COOKIE}]
CustomLog "/opt/xxx/apache2/logs/login_log" xxxlogheader env=login_jsid
RequestHeader u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Rainer,
On 3/22/18 10:11 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 22.03.2018 um 15:07 schrieb Rainer Jung:
>> Am 22.03.2018 um 11:58 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we have this annoying problem that although Tomcat workers are
>>> set to DIS state in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Martin,
On 3/22/18 6:58 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> we have this annoying problem that although Tomcat workers are set
> to DIS state in mod_jk, there are new connections being opened.
> This prevents us from "idle down" Tomcats in a timely fashio
Am 22.03.2018 um 15:07 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 22.03.2018 um 11:58 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
Hi,
we have this annoying problem that although Tomcat workers are set
to DIS
state in mod_jk, there are new connections being opened. This prevents us
from "idle down" Tomcats in a timely fashion.
Am 22.03.2018 um 11:58 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
Hi,
we have this annoying problem that although Tomcat workers are set to DIS
state in mod_jk, there are new connections being opened. This prevents us
from "idle down" Tomcats in a timely fashion. This hurts when a restart is
needed. While our
On 12.10.2016 17:17, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
Hi all, Hi Mark,
I see one change in the newest mod_jk (see below), that stops Apache in my
configuration:
The discussion on this bug is valid
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59184, however I would like to
see an explanation o why the
Dear Hildegard,
I wrote:
>Note that the AJP connection pool is used per child (and per tomcat backend
>definition if you're using more than one). You
>use connection_pool_minsize=1. Please also note, that the spare threads will
>no gather to the lowest possible number of
>childs. May this fac
Dear Hildegard,
you wrote, you're using the worker MPM. What are the pool sizes for child
workers and it's threads, i.e. the values for ServerLimit, ThreadsPerChild?
And what's the minimum thread pool size, i.e. MinSpareThreads?
Note that the AJP connection pool is used per child (and per t
Thank you for both!
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
> Am 12.07.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Wayne Li:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no
>> static html files.
>> Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu)
>> as the front and forward
Am 12.07.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Wayne Li:
Hi,
I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no
static html files.
Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu)
as the front and forward eveything to tomcat. I installed mod_jk using
Ubuntu's software
center.. Things are working.
On 12.07.2016 19:44, Wayne Li wrote:
Hi,
I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no
static html files.
Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu)
as the front and forward eveything to tomcat. I installed mod_jk using
Ubuntu's software
center.. Things are working. But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerry,
On 6/4/16 2:00 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
> I am calling a JSP to start a fairly long-running process in
> Tomcat. I'm not using the page response data. The JSP is simply a
> way to initiate the process. The JSP simply returns "OK" or "RC=".
>
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Jerry Malcolm
wrote:
> I am calling a JSP to start a fairly long-running process in Tomcat. I'm
> not using the page response data. The JSP is simply a way to initiate the
> process. The JSP simply returns "OK" or "RC=". However, mod_jk gets
> impatient, and af
On 28.01.2016 15:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2016-01-28 16:44 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
Hi.
On the page
http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
the following mod_jk binaries are available :
[...]
Y
2016-01-28 16:44 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
>> Hi.
>>
>> On the page
>> http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
>> the following mod_jk binaries are available :
>>
>> [...]
>
> You may try here:
> http://ww
On 28.01.2016 14:44, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
Hi.
On the page
http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
the following mod_jk binaries are available :
tomcat-connectors-1.2.40-windows-i386-httpd-2.0.x.zip 20
2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
Hi.
On the page
http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
the following mod_jk binaries are available :
tomcat-connectors-1.2.40-windows-i386-httpd-2.0.x.zip 2014-04-14 21:40
130K ZIP compressed archive
tomc
2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
> Hi.
>
> On the page
> http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
> the following mod_jk binaries are available :
>
> tomcat-connectors-1.2.40-windows-i386-httpd-2.0.x.zip 2014-04-14 21:40
> 130K ZIP compressed
Hello Christopher & Rainer
Sorry for late response.
I didn't knotice that your reply becasue my email box set wrongly.
I run with configure
./configure CFLAGS='-arch x86_64' APXSLDFLAGS='-arch x86_64'
--with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs
at the tomcat-connectors-1.2.41-src/native folder.
And the XCode
Rainer,
On 10/29/15 5:31 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 29.10.2015 um 03:59 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
>> Youngho,
>>
>> On 10/28/15 10:35 PM, Youngho Cho wrote:
>>> Just before I upgrade to OSX 10.11.1
>>>
>>> And try to compile Apache mod_jk 1.2.41.
>>>
>>> But the make is fail.
>>>
>>> You
Am 29.10.2015 um 03:59 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
Youngho,
On 10/28/15 10:35 PM, Youngho Cho wrote:
Just before I upgrade to OSX 10.11.1
And try to compile Apache mod_jk 1.2.41.
But the make is fail.
YounghoiMac:native youngho$ sudo make
Making all in common
usr/share/apr-1/build-1/
Youngho,
On 10/28/15 10:35 PM, Youngho Cho wrote:
> Just before I upgrade to OSX 10.11.1
>
> And try to compile Apache mod_jk 1.2.41.
>
> But the make is fail.
>
> YounghoiMac:native youngho$ sudo make
>
> Making all in common
> usr/share/apr-1/build-1/libtool --silent --mode=compile
> /App
Am 03.03.2015 um 23:11 schrieb Jesse Defer:
any update on the behavior of the patched nodes? Did it behave better,
ie.
did the problem reoccur on other nodes but not on the patched ones,
or were all nodes mostly without problems during the last 2 days? Any
strange things on the patched ones? I'
> >> any update on the behavior of the patched nodes? Did it behave better,
> ie.
> >> did the problem reoccur on other nodes but not on the patched ones,
> >> or were all nodes mostly without problems during the last 2 days? Any
> >> strange things on the patched ones? I'd like to add the patch fo
For an explanation of what we mean by "please do not top post", see here :
http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html
Got it ?
Rajesh Cherukuri wrote:
Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request
to the tomcat that was down
using Mod_jk 1.2.37 version
On Mon, Mar 2
Please dont top post.
On 03/02/2015 04:07 PM, Rajesh Cherukuri wrote:
Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request
to the tomcat that was down
Are you sure that there's not some other tomcat in the same load
balanced worker that's in hang? Didnt had time to chec
Yes it is always 20 sec always the case when the MOD_jk assigns the request
to the tomcat that was down
using Mod_jk 1.2.37 version
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Please don't top post, it makes following the communication very hard.
>
> Am 02.03.2015 um 12:48 schrieb Raje
Please don't top post, it makes following the communication very hard.
Am 02.03.2015 um 12:48 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri:
for telnet immediateconnection refused is given
telnet 10.xxx.xxx.xx 8911
Trying 10.xx.xx.x...
telnet: connect to address 10.xx.x.xx: Connection refused
Then I would
for telnet immediateconnection refused is given
telnet 10.xxx.xxx.xx 8911
Trying 10.xx.xx.x...
telnet: connect to address 10.xx.x.xx: Connection refused
here is the error log for the specifed time
[Fri Feb 27 02:26:14.463 2015] [31713:140059770595072] [error]
ajp_service::jk_ajp_common
Am 02.03.2015 um 11:34 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri:
rainer
looks like what you said is correct , but not sure why the Mod_jk has to
wait for 10 seconds when the backend tomcat servers is down
Because your network layer behaves like that. It simply hangs for (more
than) 10 seconds. You should be
rainer
looks like what you said is correct , but not sure why the Mod_jk has to
wait for 10 seconds when the backend tomcat servers is down
here is the error log i don't see that any place where it is aitng for 20
sec
error log
[Thu Feb 26 01:28:35.432 2015] [19535:140214433396480] [error]
ajp
Am 02.03.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri:
here is what i can see in modJk log file , we have stopped tomcat 11 a week
back ,
172.x [27/Feb/2015:*02:28:14* +] "GET /xx/deal-finder
HTTP/1.1"200 15172 20 *lb* tomcat--11** 0 26712 12118 **tomcat-03**
0 820679 4 *20.35284
here is what i can see in modJk log file , we have stopped tomcat 11 a week
back ,
172.x [27/Feb/2015:*02:28:14* +] "GET /xx/deal-finder
HTTP/1.1"200 15172 20 *lb* tomcat--11** 0 26712 12118 **tomcat-03**
0 820679 4 *20.352845* –
worker configuration
*here is my work.prop
Am 01.03.2015 um 17:57 schrieb Rajesh Cherukuri:
hi today i have noticed that mod_jk took 20 seconds delay in sending the
request to backend tomcat servers from apache , lookslike the request was
assigned to a tomcat 11and it has replicate the request to the other
tomcat-3
here are my findings
Am 27.02.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Jesse Defer:
Hi Jesse,
any update on the behavior of the patched nodes? Did it behave better, ie.
did the problem reoccur on other nodes but not on the patched ones, or
were all nodes mostly without problems during the last 2 days? Any strange
things on the patched
> Hi Jesse,
>
> any update on the behavior of the patched nodes? Did it behave better, ie.
> did the problem reoccur on other nodes but not on the patched ones, or
> were all nodes mostly without problems during the last 2 days? Any strange
> things on the patched ones? I'd like to add the patch f
Hi Jesse,
any update on the behavior of the patched nodes? Did it behave better,
ie. did the problem reoccur on other nodes but not on the patched ones,
or were all nodes mostly without problems during the last 2 days? Any
strange things on the patched ones? I'd like to add the patch for 1.2.4
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 3:41 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk causing stuck Apache processes
>
> So here is a patch for version 1.2.40:
>
> http://peopl
Hi Jesse,
Am 24.02.2015 um 19:27 schrieb Jesse Defer:
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 5:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk causing stuck Apache processes
Am 24.02.2015 um 00:29 schrieb Jesse Defer:
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 5:00 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk causing stuck Apache processes
>
> Am 24.02.2015 um 00:29 schrieb Jesse Defer:
> >>
Am 24.02.2015 um 00:29 schrieb Jesse Defer:
-Original Message-
Am 23.02.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Jesse Defer:
-Original Message-
Am 23.02.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Jesse Defer:
...
How many Apache web servers sit in front of the Tomcats? Is each of the
Apaches configured with 512 pr
> -Original Message-
> Am 23.02.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Jesse Defer:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> Am 23.02.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Jesse Defer:
> >>> I have a farm of Apache httpd servers proxying to Tomcat with mod_jk
> >>> and
> >> I am having issues with Apache processes getting stuc
Am 23.02.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Jesse Defer:
-Original Message-
Am 23.02.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Jesse Defer:
I have a farm of Apache httpd servers proxying to Tomcat with mod_jk and
I am having issues with Apache processes getting stuck (as seen by the W
state in server-status). I am sen
> -Original Message-
> Am 23.02.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Jesse Defer:
> > I have a farm of Apache httpd servers proxying to Tomcat with mod_jk and
> I am having issues with Apache processes getting stuck (as seen by the W
> state in server-status). I am sending to this list because the stack
Am 23.02.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 23.02.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Jesse Defer:
I have a farm of Apache httpd servers proxying to Tomcat with mod_jk
and I am having issues with Apache processes getting stuck (as seen by
the W state in server-status). I am sending to this list because th
Am 23.02.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Jesse Defer:
I have a farm of Apache httpd servers proxying to Tomcat with mod_jk and I am
having issues with Apache processes getting stuck (as seen by the W state in
server-status). I am sending to this list because the stack traces show httpd
gets stuck in mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Rainer,
On 1/30/15 5:57 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 30.01.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
>> On 7/23/14 5:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Rainer,
>>>
>>> On 7/23/14, 4:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 23.07.2014 um 21:03 schrieb C
Am 30.01.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
On 7/23/14 5:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer,
On 7/23/14, 4:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 23.07.2014 um 21:03 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
On 7/23/14, 1:49 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
The other case, a request with an invalid session
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Rainer,
On 7/23/14 5:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Rainer,
>
> On 7/23/14, 4:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Am 23.07.2014 um 21:03 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
>
>>> On 7/23/14, 1:49 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
The other case, a request wit
>I'm surprised that the Alfresco team is still giving-out advice that
>was appropriate in the mid-2000s.
>Some notes:
>1. Don't put in server.xml. Just don't.
>2. "debug" hasn't been used in ... forever.
>3. path="" is bad, and isn't necessary if you follow #1
It did not work so i took it out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 1/26/15 8:05 PM, Chris Arnold wrote:
>>> Yeah, that document is evidently a pack of lies. Specifically,
>>> the "path" and "docbase" attributes in are ignored
>>> in META-INF/context.xml files, and you really shouldn't have
>>> your any
>> Yeah, that document is evidently a pack of lies. Specifically,
>> the "path" and "docbase" attributes in are ignored in
>> META-INF/context.xml files, and you really shouldn't have your
>> anywhere else (except in
>> conf/[engine]/[host]/[appname].xml, which behaves almost the same
>> way).
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 1/26/15 5:36 PM, Chris Arnold wrote:
>
>> Yeah, that document is evidently a pack of lies. Specifically,
>> the "path" and "docbase" attributes in are ignored in
>> META-INF/context.xml files, and you really shouldn't have your
>> any
> Yeah, that document is evidently a pack of lies. Specifically, the
> "path" and "docbase" attributes in are ignored in
> META-INF/context.xml files, and you really shouldn't have your
> anywhere else (except in conf/[engine]/[host]/[appname].xml,
> which behaves almost the same way).
>
> Best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 1/26/15 4:52 PM, Chris Arnold wrote:
>> The best possible setup here is to set up httpd with more than
>> one VirtualHost (and SNI, since you are using HTTPS) with the
>> correct hostnames, etc., and only use JkMount from the "share2"
>> V
>>If the application can't handle that (try it!), you'll have to make
>>other arrangements.
>According to:
>https://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Deploying_To_Server
>that is not even necessary. I understand that link is a years old and talks
>about tomcat 6 but the general >idea is the same. I will tr
1 - 100 of 1505 matches
Mail list logo
