On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:33:09PM -0500, Steve Ochani wrote:
> On 22 Nov 2005 at 14:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:17:56PM +0100, Alex Moreno wrote:
> > > The problem is that some partners has said me that this is insecure
> > > and should only be used on beta appli
e respond to
"Tomcat Users List"
To
Alex Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tomcat Users List
cc
Tomcat Users List
Subject
FTP Was: Re: manager for some users
On 22 Nov 2005 at 14:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:17:56PM +0100, Alex Moreno wrot
On 22 Nov 2005 at 14:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:17:56PM +0100, Alex Moreno wrote:
> > The problem is that some partners has said me that this is insecure
> > and should only be used on beta application servers. At least this
> > is what the department says us to deny
> On 11/22/05, Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you set which ever server.xml parameter it is that auto-reloads an
> > application (I think it's reloadable="true", or something like that) and
> > just have your users recompile their entire app each time and then ftp
> > it into the relevant d
The problem is that some partners has said me that this is insecure and
should only be used on beta application servers. At least this is what the
department says us to deny this petition.
On 11/22/05, Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you set which ever server.xml parameter it is that auto-
If you set which ever server.xml parameter it is that auto-reloads an
application (I think it's reloadable="true", or something like that) and
just have your users recompile their entire app each time and then ftp
it into the relevant directory, tomcat should automatically reload each
app for t
