gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: jk2 vs mod_jk and mod_proxy_balancer
>
> frannack Guimard schrieb:
> > Rainer,
> >
> > Thank you for your input. I send you another e-mail but it looks like you
> > didn't
rs@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: jk2 vs mod_jk and mod_proxy_balancer
frannack Guimard schrieb:
Hello,
I just looked at mod_jk2. I was looking for a way to add programmatically a
worker to the balancer with mod_jk or mod_proxy_balancer, but couldn't find a
way. And then I saw in the mod_j
make that work a way
or an other to manage my zillion tomcat instances :)
Thank you.
Franck
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:16:53 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: jk2 vs mod_jk and mod_proxy_balancer
>
> frannack Guimard schrieb:
>
frannack Guimard schrieb:
Hello,
I just looked at mod_jk2. I was looking for a way to add programmatically a
worker to the balancer with mod_jk or mod_proxy_balancer, but couldn't find a
way. And then I saw in the mod_jk2 documentation:
1. Edit workers2.properties. Add a new channel. If you wa
