PROTECTED]>
> To: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Tomcat Users List"
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:03 PM
> Subject: Re: java.util.PropertyPermission
>
>
>
>> Sure. I have the following in my policy file:
>>
>> /
ge -
From: "Ryan Daly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: java.util.PropertyPermission
> Sure. I have the following in my policy file:
>
> /
ssage in error, please notify
> the sender immediately by telephone or email and destroy the original
> message without making a copy. Thank you.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ryan Daly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Users List"
&g
o: "Tomcat Users List"
Cc: "Propes, Barry L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: java.util.PropertyPermission
> I'm not following what you're suggesting.
> --
>
> Propes, Barry L wrote:
>> isn't t
rmission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.specification.vendor",
> "read";
> permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.specification.name",
> "read";
> permission java.util.PropertyPermission "java.vm.version", &
I'm not following what you're suggesting.
--
Propes, Barry L wrote:
> isn't that because the permission object picks all of that up as one item,
> and overrides your separate setting?
>
> I would think it would. Wouldn't you need to create an entire new object or
> not for that to work?
>
> --
isn't that because the permission object picks all of that up as one item, and
overrides your separate setting?
I would think it would. Wouldn't you need to create an entire new object or not
for that to work?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, J
