RE: character encodingg problem

2007-08-14 Thread Russo, Joe
here ms_no = 'CAN-06-2483' -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 5:24 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: character encodingg problem -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe, Russo, Joe wrote: >

RE: character encodingg problem

2007-08-13 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Ryan Shelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: character encodingg problem > > however, I noticed that when I redeploy my war, my custom > it#idm.war context file is also removed You can't use the manager app or any other conventional script I know of t

Re: character encodingg problem

2007-08-13 Thread Ryan Shelley
2007 3:00 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: character encodingg problem -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe, Russo, Joe wrote: Of course, the existing data that is stored incorrectly can not be viewed correctly. I thought by changing the filter you sent by interrupting the char

Re: character encodingg problem

2007-08-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe, Russo, Joe wrote: > Chris, > Thank you very much for you response. I am going to try and look at how > long it will take to do this type of conversion for 39 databases. Ouch! Perhaps your database supports a query that might be able to do thi

RE: character encodingg problem

2007-08-13 Thread Russo, Joe
Subject: Re: character encodingg problem -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe, Russo, Joe wrote: > Of course, the existing data that is stored incorrectly can not be > viewed correctly. I thought by changing the filter you sent by > interrupting the charset as ISO-8859-

Re: character encodingg problem

2007-08-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe, Russo, Joe wrote: > Of course, the existing data that is stored incorrectly can not be > viewed correctly. I thought by changing the filter you sent by > interrupting the charset as ISO-8859-1 for the response would work > correctly. No, the pr