Re: c:forEach not working as expected

2006-02-14 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
--- Reinhard Moosauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi List, > > it seemed clear to me, that this construct: > > > ... (some inner logic) > > > should be equivalent to this one: No. It is roughly equvalent to (see my corrections): > <% > for (Iterator it=t.getRecords(); it.hasN

Re: c:forEach not working as expected

2006-02-13 Thread Len Popp
On 2/13/06, Reinhard Moosauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi List, > > it seemed clear to me, that this construct: > > > ... (some inner logic) > > > should be equivalent to this one: > > <% > for (Iterator it=t.getRecords(); it.hasNext(); ) { > String x = (String)it.next(); >