Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread André Warnier
Mark Eggers wrote: - Original Message - From: André Warnier To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 2:26 PM Subject: Re: URI mapping Pid wrote: ... The jsessionid cookie is set with the server name of the Tomcat instance, rather than a domain with variable

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message - > From: André Warnier > To: Tomcat Users List > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 2:26 PM > Subject: Re: URI mapping > > Pid wrote: > ... > The jsessionid cookie is set with the server >> name of the Tomcat instance, r

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread André Warnier
Pid wrote: ... The jsessionid cookie is set with the server name of the Tomcat instance, rather than a domain with variable subdomains*, unless you have configured it otherwise (Servlet 3.0 only). Yes, but what /is/ this server name that this Tomcat will be using ? I don't think that is as str

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread André Warnier
Mark Eggers wrote: - Original Message - From: André Warnier To: Tomcat Users List Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:08 AM Subject: Re: URI mapping Let's restart from the beginning. You have, say, 3 Tomcat servers running, and for the sake of the example let's say

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Pid
On 23/10/2011 20:51, Mark Eggers wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: André Warnier >> To: Tomcat Users List >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:08 AM >> Subject: Re: URI mapping >> >> Let's restart from the beginning. &

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message - > From: André Warnier > To: Tomcat Users List > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:08 AM > Subject: Re: URI mapping > > Let's restart from the beginning. > > You have, say, 3 Tomcat servers running, and for the sake of the exa

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread André Warnier
Let's restart from the beginning. You have, say, 3 Tomcat servers running, and for the sake of the example let's say that these are - a Tomcat 5.x server - a Tomcat 6.x server - a Tomcat 7.x server You want to run the same applications on all of them (with identical names on each server), bec

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Rainer Jung
On 22.10.2011 18:42, Eldon Olmstead wrote: > Thanks for the response Mark, > > Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at > work ), then if I understand right, I have no choice but to make tomcat > support /tomcat7/ in the path. Do I do this just by moving all the > web

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-23 Thread Pid
On 22/10/2011 23:37, Eldon Olmstead wrote: > > > On 2011-10-22 5:57 PM, Pid wrote: >> On 22/10/2011 17:42, Eldon Olmstead wrote: >>> Thanks for the response Mark, >>> >>> Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at >>> work ), then if I understand right, I have no choic

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Eldon Olmstead
On 2011-10-22 5:57 PM, Pid wrote: On 22/10/2011 17:42, Eldon Olmstead wrote: Thanks for the response Mark, Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at work ), then if I understand right, I have no choice but to make tomcat support /tomcat7/ in the path. Do I do this

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Pid
On 22/10/2011 17:42, Eldon Olmstead wrote: > Thanks for the response Mark, > > Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at > work ), then if I understand right, I have no choice but to make tomcat > support /tomcat7/ in the path. Do I do this just by moving all the > web

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread André Warnier
Hi. What response ? to what question ? Top-posting makes it difficult to follow the flow of questions/answers. Mark's response was at the bottom, where it was logically following the part of the question he was answering. Once it has started that way, it is a lot easier for everyone to contin

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Tobias Crefeld
Am Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:17:26 +0100 schrieb Mark Thomas : > ProxyPass /tomcat7 http://localhost:8080 > or > ProxyPass /tomcat7 ajp://localhost:8080 Usually Tomcat is listening for ajp-requests on port 8009, not 8080. Regards, Tobias. -

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Eldon Olmstead
Thanks for the response Mark, Ok so if I want to keep mod_jk as part of this, ( it is what we use at work ), then if I understand right, I have no choice but to make tomcat support /tomcat7/ in the path. Do I do this just by moving all the webapps under webapps/tomcat7/? Will I have to make ot

Re: URI mapping

2011-10-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/10/2011 17:11, Eldon Olmstead wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using the following > Apache2.2 > mod_jk 1.2.32 > Tomcat 7.0.21 > > I am trying to understand how to configure Apache to allow access to > Tomcat via mod_jk. I have already made some progress, but have got stuck > on one point. > > Curr