Re: Tomcat5,Apache2,mod_ssl and mod_jk

2006-11-16 Thread Marx
Apache 1.3 get request and map it to local system, and when with "required" is hit, it denies access and will not even try to forward to mod_jk. In Apache 2.0 it first try to forward using mod_jk and then if no JKmount fits it checks In both situations it firsts checks so always work. So s

Re: Tomcat5,Apache2,mod_ssl and mod_jk

2006-11-16 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marx, Marx wrote: > One more information, everything works ok if I use directive , > bu I want to be more secure and I want to use > Marx This isn't going to work for you. You can't rely on Apache httpd's protections to protect directories what Tom

Re: Tomcat5,Apache2,mod_ssl and mod_jk

2006-11-16 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Marx, I didn't go into the details, but I find it normal, that Directory directives don't apply to mod_jk. The module simply forwards URLs and not requests mapped to a file system. So using it together with Location seems natural to me (and you can argue, if this is more secure or less tha

Re: Tomcat5,Apache2,mod_ssl and mod_jk

2006-11-16 Thread Marx
One more information, everything works ok if I use directive , bu I want to be more secure and I want to use Marx - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional