Thank you Andre, Michael, Konstantin and Mark.
As suggested from the thread dump (all the threads where in waiting state),
we had a thread synchronization problem in the code (committed recently). We
could find this out after a few load tests on Tomcat and further code
reviews.
Corrected this, and
Hi.
K J.Sreekumar wrote:
Hello Andre
TCP0.0.0.0:8080 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
5356
[tomcat6.exe]
Apart from the above and the other ports in LISTEN state, when "tomcat
freezes", do you have any other ports in the netstat listing, shown as
"CLOSE_WAIT" for example ?
Hello Andre
>>> TCP0.0.0.0:8080 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
>>> 5356
>>>
>>> [tomcat6.exe]
>>>
>>>
>> Apart from the above and the other ports in LISTEN state, when "tomcat
>> freezes", do you have any other ports in the netstat listing, shown as
>> "CLOSE_WAIT" for example ?
Hello All,
Thank you for the suggestions.
We noted that we have these errors in the logs -
SEVERE: The web application [/rel] registered the JBDC driver
[oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver] but failed to unregister it when the web
application was stopped. To prevent a memory leak, the JDBC Driver has been
f
Mark Thomas schrieb am 19.12.2010 um 17:43 (+):
> On 17/12/2010 12:52, K J.Sreekumar wrote:
> >
> > This is the problem -
> >
> >1. Our tomcat 6 server (version 6.0.29) does not respond
> >after working for a couple of days. Browsers are unable to
> >find application URLs (which w
On 17/12/2010 12:52, K J.Sreekumar wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are hitting on a weird problem with tomcat 6 production server (which is
> a serious concern for us now). Hoping to get help from the you guys
>
> This is the problem -
>
>1. Our tomcat 6 server (version 6.0.29) does not respond a
2010/12/17 K J.Sreekumar :
> The logs does not show any error.
Do they show anything at all?
> There are only a total of 50-60 threads in the thread dump, mostly in WAIT
> state. Also, it does not show any BLOCKING or LOCKED threads.
It would be interesting to look at the thread dump.
If it is
André Warnier wrote:
K J.Sreekumar wrote:
Hello Andre,
Thank you for your attention to this query.
The these entries in the netstat shows tomcat running. (These were
missing
in the original message and were appended in a subsequent mail.)
TCP0.0.0.0:8009 0.0.0.0:0
K J.Sreekumar wrote:
Hello Andre,
Thank you for your attention to this query.
The these entries in the netstat shows tomcat running. (These were missing
in the original message and were appended in a subsequent mail.)
TCP0.0.0.0:8009 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 5356
K J.Sreekumar schrieb am 19.12.2010 um 17:33 (+0530):
>
> Yes we are using apache httpd as front-end to tomcat using mod_proxy
> (not AJP). The configuration in httpd.conf are
>
> ProxyPass /rel/ http://localhost:8080/rel/
> ProxyPassReverse /rel/ http://localhost:8080/rel/
Do the mod_proxy logs
Hello Andre,
Thank you for your attention to this query.
The these entries in the netstat shows tomcat running. (These were missing
in the original message and were appended in a subsequent mail.)
TCP0.0.0.0:8009 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 5356
[tomcat6.exe]
TCP
K J.Sreekumar wrote:
We have done the tests you had mentioned.
here are our answers to your questions (i'm adding my name before my
comments so that its easier to identity who said what if this conversation
builds up further)-
*1.* What do you mean by : Browsers are unable to find application UR
Hello Michael,
Thank you for the quick reply.
It seems the complete list of netstat output somehow got omitted. They have
been appended to this mail. Tomcat is displayed as running on port 8080.
> HTTP 1.0 doesn't require the Host header. But I don't understand what
>worked and what didn't.
Clari
K J.Sreekumar schrieb am 18.12.2010 um 17:57 (+0530):
> (i'm adding my name before my comments so that its easier to identity
> who said what if this conversation builds up further)-
You could configure your mail client to use standard indentation.
> ** Sreekumar.* Using Firefox 3.6x we get the f
K J.Sreekumar schrieb am 17.12.2010 um 18:22 (+0530):
>
>1. Our tomcat 6 server (version 6.0.29) does not respond
>after working for a couple of days. Browsers are unable
>to find application URLs (which were previously processed
>normally).
What does this mean? They're getting 40
K J.Sreekumar wrote:
Hello All,
We are hitting on a weird problem with tomcat 6 production server (which is
a serious concern for us now). Hoping to get help from the you guys
This is the problem -
1. Our tomcat 6 server (version 6.0.29) does not respond after working
for a couple of day
That's an awful lot of processes. Quite possibly a problem with the
driver you are using ... It's not very well rated.
If you want some advice, try using a non-DBCP pool (C3P0)
sourceforge.net/projects/c3p0, and also the best SQL Server driver out
there which is at jtds.sourceforge.net.
Add both
17 matches
Mail list logo
