RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread George Sexton
Subject: Re: Tomcat integegrated with Apache > > ### "George Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote message to > "'Tomcat Users > List'" ### > ### this is reply for: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache ### > > If I can avoid using Apache, th

Re: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Rafal Zawadzki
### "Peter Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote message to "Tomcat Users List" ### ### this is reply for: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache ### > > From: Rafal Zawadzki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Why not use squid? > > One view: Why go through an

Re: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Marco Rossi
Users List'" ### ### this is reply for: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache ### > If I can avoid using Apache, then I run tomcat on a non-privileged port and > use IPTables to re-direct from port 80 to the non-privileged port. Why not use squid? -- Rafał Z

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Peter Crowther
> From: Rafal Zawadzki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Why not use squid? One view: Why go through another user-level process when you can simply redirect the socket connections via iptables for fewer CPU cycles and less RAM? Another view: squid may be faster at serving static content, so interposin

Re: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Rafal Zawadzki
### "George Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote message to "'Tomcat Users List'" ### ### this is reply for: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache ### > If I can avoid using Apache, then I run tomcat on a non-privileged port and > use IPTables to re-dire

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread George Sexton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:12 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache > > > George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can give a > reason. Its called Connector de-jour. The "preferred" > connec

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Marco Rossi
George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can give a reason. Its called Connector de-jour. The "preferred" connector, changes every 6 months and they're bloody impossible to configure and keep straight. Building a connector is impossible unless you are a REALLY highly skill UNIX sysadmin. I com

Re: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Jess Holle
sorts of things also currently drive folk to use Apache currently. -- Jess Holle Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Gary Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache Can you give any specifics as to why you think running Tomcat in front of Apache is bad

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Gary Blomquist
cause a problem with load balancing and non-sticky sessions? Gary -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:34 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache > From: Gary Blomquist [mailto:[EM

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Gary Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache > > Can you give any specifics as to why you think running Tomcat in front > of Apache is bad? 1) Extra overhead. 2) Additional complexity. 3) Added points of failure. Certainly if

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread George Sexton
2, 2006 6:55 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache > > Can you give any specifics as to why you think running Tomcat in front > of Apache is bad? > > We were considering doing that for load balancing but now we are > th

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Gary Blomquist
: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:51 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat integegrated with Apache The connector is integrated into Apache Httpd 2.2 which was just released as stable in December. Versions prior still require you download and build mod_jk.so separately. Personally, I think you

Re: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread David Smith
The connector is integrated into Apache Httpd 2.2 which was just released as stable in December. Versions prior still require you download and build mod_jk.so separately. Personally, I think you should avoid putting Apache in front unless you have other technologies to support (ie PHP or Perl

Re: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-12 Thread Rafal Zawadzki
### Pete Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote message to Tomcat Users List ### ### this is reply for: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache ### > I'm using Tomcat 5.5. I want to keep it simple. It always seems to > take me 2 days of anguish to get Apache/Tomcat working togeth

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-11 Thread Pete Alvin
I'm using Tomcat 5.5. I want to keep it simple. It always seems to take me 2 days of anguish to get Apache/Tomcat working together. Is it now unnecessary to hook it up to Apache? I need to also serve images and static HTML files. Is that efficient if I use Tomcat? In this case I'm sure you'd

RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache

2006-01-11 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Pete Alvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat integegrated with Apache > > I'm trying to get Tomcat running on a new BSD box and my IT guys says > that a connector isn't necessary because it's integrated with Apache. You have to configure the connector in Tomcat and, depending o