On Dec 26, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/12/2013 19:33, Jesse Barnum wrote:
>> Any ideas here?
>
> It sounds like a bug in the deployer. Can you confirm the behaviour with
> the latest 7.0.x release? If so, please create a Bugzilla entry.
>
> Mark
>
I verified that it's happeni
On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 27/12/2013 05:32, Jesse Barnum wrote:
>> I ran apt-get today and I got version 7.0.35, not 7.0.47. Maybe this
>> is more of a Linux question then Tomcat, but shouldn't apt-get get me
>> the latest version? Do I need to do something on my end, o
On 27/12/2013 05:32, Jesse Barnum wrote:
> I ran apt-get today and I got version 7.0.35, not 7.0.47. Maybe this
> is more of a Linux question then Tomcat, but shouldn't apt-get get me
> the latest version? Do I need to do something on my end, or is this
> something that the Tomcat team needs to pub
I ran apt-get today and I got version 7.0.35, not 7.0.47. Maybe this is more of
a Linux question then Tomcat, but shouldn't apt-get get me the latest version?
Do I need to do something on my end, or is this something that the Tomcat team
needs to publish somewhere?
--Jesse Barnum, President, 36
On 26/12/2013 19:33, Jesse Barnum wrote:
> Any ideas here?
It sounds like a bug in the deployer. Can you confirm the behaviour with
the latest 7.0.x release? If so, please create a Bugzilla entry.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
