RE: Tomcat and mod_jk

Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:29 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat and mod_jk I had a similar problem to this in march. I found that for me I had to adjust the default connector information for the port 8009 in the tomcat config file server.xml. I mad

Re: Tomcat and mod_jk

I had a similar problem to this in march. I found that for me I had to adjust the default connector information for the port 8009 in the tomcat config file server.xml. I made the 8009 connector look like the 8080 connector. So I guess if you are using port 8084 for directly accessing your tomca

RE: Tomcat and mod_jk question on Red Hat 9

: Adrian Nadeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 January 2006 17:01 To: Jonathan Woods Cc: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Re: Tomcat and mod_jk question on Red Hat 9 Thanks for the information... In our mod_jk log we have the following showing up: [Wed Jan 25 13:21:33 2006] [jk_aj

Re: Tomcat and mod_jk question on Red Hat 9

Thanks for the information... In our mod_jk log we have the following showing up: [Wed Jan 25 13:21:33 2006] [jk_ajp_common.c (1401)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=1 [Wed Jan 25 13:21:33 2006] [jk_ajp_common.c (836)]: ajp_connection_tcp_get_message: Error -

RE: Tomcat and mod_jk question on Red Hat 9

Adrian - I haven't met this problem, but a few things occurred to me after reading your message: 1. Don't forgot you could probably (depending on your config) always use mod_proxy instead of mod_jk, just as a temporary measure. 2. Sometimes browsers are set to have only 2 or 3 concurrent conne