We use LVS+ldirectord. It does not provide the kind of logs you're referring to.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 12:03 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Processing Timer Question
>
> Hi,
>
LB's logs for the same.
What software do you use for load balancing?
> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
>
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:11:43 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.o
istopher Schultz
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:11:43 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat Processing Timer Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric,
On 9/10/20 15:29, Eric Robinson wrote:
> Chris --
>
>
>> You should also look at worker-th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric,
On 9/10/20 15:29, Eric Robinson wrote:
> Chris --
>
>
>> You should also look at worker-thread availability. When you see
>> these "high latency" (which is usually a term reserved for I/O
>> characterization) events, do you have:>> 1. Availab
culprit
for a while, but I just didn't know for sure if my understanding of the tomcat
processing timer is correct.
--Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 8:24 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomcat
e load-balancer/multiplexer level?
- -chris
>> -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020
>> 7:41 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat
>> Processing Timer Question
>>
> Eric,
>
> On 9/8/20 17:
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 7:41 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Processing Timer Question
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Eric,
>
> On 9/8/20 17:29,
ing to diagnose or fix?
Or are you just academically interested in what conditions might cause
"slow" request processing?
Hope that helps,
- -chris
>> -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 4:05 PM To:
>> users@tomcat.apache.org Subject
5 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Processing Timer Question
>
> On 08/09/2020 21:46, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > Hi Mark --
> >
> > "If the request is split across multiple packets the timer starts when
> > Tomcat
> reads the first byte o
as
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 3:34 PM
>> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat Processing Timer Question
>>
>> On 08/09/2020 21:19, Eric Robinson wrote:
>>> Hi Mark and Christopher,
>>>
>>> For clarification, suppose a cl
m: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 3:34 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Processing Timer Question
>
> On 08/09/2020 21:19, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > Hi Mark and Christopher,
> >
> > For clarification, suppose a client sends and HTTP P
.
Tomcat stops the timer on a request after the last byte of the response
has been accepted by the network stack.
HTH,
Mark
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christopher Schultz
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:19 PM
>> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>
est before processing it. So when does tomcat start its
processing timer?
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:19 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Processing Timer Question
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric,
On 9/8/20 13:46, Eric Robinson wrote:
> It is my understanding that the AccessLogValve %D field records the
> time from when the last byte of the client's request is received
> to when the last byte of the server's response is placed on the
>
On 08/09/2020 18:46, Eric Robinson wrote:
> It is my understanding that the AccessLogValve %D field records the time from
> when the last byte of the client's request is received to when the last byte
> of the server's response is placed on the wire. Is that correct? If so, would
> TCP retransmi
15 matches
Mail list logo
