Well, here is the information
the platform (OS) redhat enterprise 6.4(64 bit)
- the Java JVM version used (1.7.45)
- the Tomcat version used (7.0.45)
- the APR version used (APR from redhat cd)
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> 杨华杰 wrote:
>
>> Tomcat performance goes down
杨华杰 wrote:
Tomcat performance goes down after install apr.
I followed this doc
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/, I think the different is I didn't set sslengine setting as I don't use it. And I saw the error in catilina.out, I simply ignore it as I don't use it.
I fired 300 concurrent ca
On 25/11/2012 00:50, Alex Moskvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Tomcat 7.0.30 and OpenEJB 4.5 to host high loaded app and at
> some point found with VisualVM there is a bottleneck when there is a lot of
> concurrent requests (about 400-600 req/sec). Requests and responses are
> small (usually not la
Hi Alex,
Typically I have found the first issue is the response time of the database
queries. Threads and sockets will start to reach a limit when this happens.
Then after that is looked at then the next issue will be understanding what is
really possible with the system. Just going from EJB co
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:19 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
>
> Hello Talha,
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Talha Fazal wrote:
Hello Christopher,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Leon,
>
> On 9/2/2011 4:19 PM, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
>> from my experience there is no need for apache in your
>> setup anyway .
>
> Uh, load-balancing?
Aeh... load
Paste the workers.properties file and the mod_jk settings here. Are you
using prefork or mpm in Apache? Have you tuned the apache settings to match
the tomcat number of threads?
Igor
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
On 9/2/2011 4:19 PM, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
> from my experience there is no need for apache in your
> setup anyway .
Uh, load-balancing?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla
exposed to outside attacks; B) Load balancing.
Thanks Leon!
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Talha
> Thanks,
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: R Batchelor [mailto:rsbat...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:10 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
>
> Have you ruled out issues with db connection pooling? NO. I
o try mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy instead of mod_jk. Any
thoughts here?
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: R Batchelor [mailto:rsbat...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Have you ruled out issues with db conne
'd but all the database users/connections are idle.
These can be symptoms of an application mis-managing its dbcp pools.
From: Leon Rosenberg
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talh
; -Original Message-
>> From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:35 AM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
>>
>> Hello Talha,
>>
>> from a quick glance at your post
[mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.
> From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.
> We did take a thread dump and we found a lot of threa
Hi Leon,
Please see any answers in CAPS below.
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:06 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
seems that your tomcats are fine.
Question
> From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.
> We did take a thread dump and we found a lot of threads locked.
> "http-8014-9" daemon prio=10 tid=0x60965c00 nid=0x6c83 in
> Ob
t;
> Thanks!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:35 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
>
> Hello Talha,
>
> from a quick glance at your post, do you have
rker)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:484)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Sincerely, Talha.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:42 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Sub
Plz. see my answers below in UPPERCAPS.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:35 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
from a quick glance at your post, do you have
> From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com]
> Subject: Tomcat Performance Turning.
> In our staging environment for load testing, when we run the load
> test using 525 concurrent users, the app doesn't perform at all.
> The CPU usage (on Apache and Tomcat Servers) hovers between 7% to
> 8%.
Hello Talha,
from a quick glance at your post, do you have the same 30 max threads
limit in weblogic?
Because sending 525 users through 2x30=60 max threads seems a little
bottlenecky.
Which software are you using to produce the load? Does it keepalive
the connections?
regards
Leon
On Fri, Sep 2,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 6/30/2011 11:23 AM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> I suspect Tomcat might support the lib you mentioned
Tomcat does not need to support the library specifically: if a library
properly uses the Servlet and/or JSP APIs properly, it should work with
Tom
: Thu, June 30, 2011 9:19:49 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues...
2011/6/30 Tony Anecito :
> Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is
Tomcat
> 6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's which means 7 has more
> issues with this &qu
2011/6/30 Tony Anecito :
> Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is
> Tomcat
> 6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's which means 7 has more
> issues with this "Standard" taglib.
>
> I could be wrong but the highest level of support is servlet 2.4 an
t 2.5.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Wed, June 29, 2011 5:10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues...
Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead
project seemed like there was no version that s
Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead
project seemed like there was no version that supported Tomcat 6.0.x.
I will continue the message thread onto that group thanks for the advice.
I am a tester but the response time was 3-4 seconds.
I have not asked the
ently tuned but for some reason,
the file access is slow.
We haven't yet got the exact reason yet, so have to wait and see.
Vijay
From: vijay_me...@hotmail.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tomcat performance under low load
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:42:30 +1000
Thanks for t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vijay,
On 10/16/2010 6:42 PM, Vijay Menon wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. Based on that, we did change the connectors
> to use executor threads. However, based on profiling the app, it
> turned out to be a code issue.
Glad you solved your problem. C
Thanks for the replies. Based on that, we did change the connectors to use
executor threads.
However, based on profiling the app, it turned out to be a code issue.
Thanks again.
From: vijay_me...@hotmail.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat performance under low load
Date: Thu, 14 Oc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vijay,
On 10/13/2010 7:35 PM, Vijay Menon wrote:
> We're scaling to satisfactory loads of 250 concurrent
> requests serving pages in 0.5 seconds.
Excellent (assuming that 0.5 seconds is acceptable to your team).
> The other test scenario is where th
> From: Vijay Menon [mailto:vijay_me...@hotmail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat performance under low load
> The other test scenario is where the tomcat instance is kept
> idle and a single request is sent in every 90 or so seconds.
> In this case, the response takes about 8 seconds out of which
> about
Rujin,
I Installed tomcat 5.5.20 version in my Windows 2008 server and the java
version is Java 1.6.0.b105.We are using 2 Mbps Bandwidth Leased line.In
tomcat we hosted around 5(five) application.When the no of seesion increases
more than 1600 session the total application is slow and not able
ate: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:35:07 -0400
> From: jhubbsl...@att.net
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux
>
> On 5/28/10 10:06 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > What about network configuration? Are both servers the
On 5/28/10 10:27 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote:
Yes both are on the same network and same distance. If I limit it to 30
threads their behavior is the same.
By this do you mean that the timing of both systems more closely match
each other if you produce just 30 threads on each?
As far as the ve
On 5/28/10 10:06 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
What about network configuration? Are both servers the same "distance"
from you on the network?
That's a reasonable question.
The only thing I can add - and I wish I knew more about this than I do -
is that Linux is configurable to a fault wh
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dave,
>
> On 5/28/2010 8:25 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote:
> > If I run this test against a Windows hosted tomc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave,
On 5/28/2010 8:25 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote:
> If I run this test against a Windows hosted tomcat all threads
> pretty much start at the same time and end within 10-20 msec of each
> other.
>
> When I run the test against a linux hosted tomcat t
2009/12/7 André Warnier
> On the other hand, it would be really interesting to compare the
> performance of a set of webservers 5 years ago, with the current ones, if
> the comparison is in terms of real-world application requests served.
> Granted, servers have become faster, memory and disk hav
Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/12/7 Neil Aggarwal
Here is one that is somewhat dated:
http://www.webperformanceinc.com/library/reports/ServletReport/
Good grief, that's not so much "dated" as "coming back from beyond the
grave"! It's two major versions and a lot of performance optimisations out
> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
> [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther
> Subject: Re: Tomcat performance benchmark
>
> Benchmarking current performance based on that report is rather like
> assuming the current Formula 1 motor racing teams a
2009/12/7 Neil Aggarwal
> Here is one that is somewhat dated:
> http://www.webperformanceinc.com/library/reports/ServletReport/
>
> Good grief, that's not so much "dated" as "coming back from beyond the
grave"! It's two major versions and a lot of performance optimisations out
of date for Tomcat
Hello:
> I would like to know if anybody could provide me with a
> unbiased "tomcat vs
> others" peformance benchmark
Here is one that is somewhat dated:
http://www.webperformanceinc.com/library/reports/ServletReport/
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net
Host y
Cae Fernandes wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I would like to know if anybody could provide me with a unbiased "tomcat vs
> others" peformance benchmark with full tests and full system specs
> (hardware, os, etc).
>
> I'm interested in concurrent amount of users, hardware load and specs.
> I've been des
> From: Peng Tuck Kwok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance
>
> David, was replying to Charles's earlier email on that.
> I thought I read it right first in the email and assumed
> Charles was correct in that.
Assuming you're referring to me,
David, was replying to Charles's earlier email on that.
I thought I read it right first in the email and assumed Charles was correct
in that.
Hazards of reading mail on the go :P
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:26 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peng Tuck Kwok wrote:
>
>> Probably the re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:26 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Peng Tuck Kwok wrote:
>>> Probably the reason why he's seeing one instance of tomcat moving quicker
>>> than 2 instances is the fact that there i
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:26 PM, David kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peng Tuck Kwok wrote:
>>
>> Probably the reason why he's seeing one instance of tomcat moving quicker
>> than 2 instances is the fact that there is some form of contention for
>> resources on that single machine assuming tha
Peng Tuck Kwok wrote:
Probably the reason why he's seeing one instance of tomcat moving quicker
than 2 instances is the fact that there is some form of contention for
resources on that single machine assuming that the 2 instances are
configured identically in every aspect (other than ports).
Y
Probably the reason why he's seeing one instance of tomcat moving quicker
than 2 instances is the fact that there is some form of contention for
resources on that single machine assuming that the 2 instances are
configured identically in every aspect (other than ports).
The idea is not to give you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pengtuck,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So let me get this straight. You are reluctant to accept a
> configuration which gives you improved throughput ? :P
No, the OP is unwilling to use a configuration that doesn't make any
sense: one single Tomcat sho
So let me get this straight. You are reluctant to accept a configuration which
gives you improved throughput ? :P
Anyway, this is not an unusual approach, from what I understand this simply
makes full use of the resources available on that machine. Not uncommon in real
world to see app servers
May be your tomcat is configured to server only limited number of
clients so it doesn't use all hardware power when you deploy two tomcats
you can serve twice as much clients.
I would say tune tomcat configuration to accept more clients
connections.
Palko
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 11:56 +0530, Nish
,
Nishi
From: Ronald Klop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 2:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc: Nishi Kant
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance
2 Instances don't compete for locking between threads. So possibly your
application depends a l
2 Instances don't compete for locking between threads. So possibly your
application depends a lot on locking?
Ronald.
Op maandag, 10 november 2008 om 7:26 uur schreef Tomcat Users List
:
Subject: Tomcat Performance
Date: Mon Nov 10 07:26:21 CET 2008
From: Nishi Kant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi A
Are you maxing out your database connection pool?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Zufeng Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> proxool:
> 9
>20
>450
>100
>
Hi Gabe,
I allocated 2 processors to the VM.
Regards,
Karim
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karim Zaki wrote:
Hi all,
I'm experiencing poor performance with Tomcat 5.0.28 running on a Windows 2000 Server VM
(Windows Server 2003 R2 host, VMWare Server 1.0.4). Tomcat takes up around 50% of the CPU
and the "System" process takes up the other 50% when making requests that
return relativ
Hello Peter, Wow! this is good stuff: exactly what I needed. I feel sorry for
the client when they see that first baseline! Thank you! David.
Peter Lin wrote ..
> from past experience, it's much better to use hardware load balancing. At a
> previous job, we had any where from 12-24 servers load b
yes, most hardware load balancer handle sticky sessions. this was back in
2001-2002. I don't know which model number it was, but it was part of
cisco's local director line of routers.
peter
On Jan 31, 2008 3:46 AM, andrey.morskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> About cisco: Peter Lin, what was the
I would be interested how much performance you were able to tickle
compared to default jvm settings?
Leon
And how many of the settings had to be reverted with switch to a newer
jdk, if any.
On Jan 31, 2008 3:49 AM, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from past experience, it's much better to u
About cisco: Peter Lin, what was the model in your case?
Was it able to replicate sessions (sticky session maybe ) ?
Peter Lin wrote:
from past experience, it's much better to use hardware load balancing. At a
previous job, we had any where from 12-24 servers load balanced behind a
cisco local d
from past experience, it's much better to use hardware load balancing. At a
previous job, we had any where from 12-24 servers load balanced behind a
cisco local director.
Any load balancing router today can do the job, it doesn't have to be
cisco. What I did in the past was to take production log
Hello Andrew, reading your email, Alan's email and the Mladen email piqued my
interest because I am currently working on a gig to improve the performance and
monitoring of two Tomcat instances supporting 3 web applications and one web
service. I am inclined to agree with Alan. And, did you read
> From: Alan Chaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unfortunately I think it is way more complicated than this.
Seconded.
Andrew, you keep mailing this list looking for simple, neat and clean ways of
working out the maximum capability of a Tomcat application. There aren't any!
The *only* reliable
Without wanting to oppose the whole document, the parts you quoted are
pretty incomplete.
first, calculating AART from clients perespective (as implicitely done
in the article) is not a good idea, since you are
mixing up tomcat response time, network transport, internet latency,
all in one bunch.
Unfortunately I think it is way more complicated than this.
I think that Mladen Turk's article has a lot of very useful information
about configuring Tomcat and I congratulate him on putting it together.
However, I've spent some time recently working on some performance
issues and I think that
ubject: Re: Tomcat Performance Question
> Ali Ok wrote:
> > Thanks David,
> >
> > I mean, if I make 3 requests in a very short time (about 10
seconds);
> > Tomcat does not respond.
> > I read books, tutorials, faqs and threads at maling list about Tomcat
> >
Ali Ok wrote:
Thanks David,
I mean, if I make 3 requests in a very short time (about 10 seconds);
Tomcat does not respond.
I read books, tutorials, faqs and threads at maling list about Tomcat
tuning. But I couldnt find an example server.xml file used in production or
real test results.
So
have you tried monitoring the CPU and IO usage of the system during the
test?
In the past, when I stress test an application, I monitor the cpu and io, to
determine which part is getting maxed out first. For example, if I was
serving up static pages, the first thing to mak out is the IO, so even
t
> From: Ali Ok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Question
>
> What if someone make so much requests and confuse the server?
> Does Tomcat have an prevention for this situation?
You can configure the maximum number of requests a will
handle concurrently,
Peter, thats ok, maybe some day we can get that much hit :)
What if someone make so much requests and confuse the server?
Does Tomcat have an prevention for this situation? Or is it beyond the
scope?
David, I have already read all of resources you sent.
Invariably performance issues are rarely a
Hello Ali, there are no absolute benchmarks for what you are looking for. The
central theme to any performance questions invariably lead to the word
(Architecture). You need to evaluate you overall architecture from a high level
perspective. With this said the questions then are:
* What is your
30,000 requests in 10 seconds probably isn't normal traffic, but it could
represent a sudden spike.
think of it another way, that's 3,000 requests per second. If we calculate
that for a 10 hour period, it puts things in perspective
1000 req/sec * 60 sec/min = 60,000 req/min
60,000 req/min * 60 mi
Thanks David,
I mean, if I make 3 requests in a very short time (about 10 seconds);
Tomcat does not respond.
I read books, tutorials, faqs and threads at maling list about Tomcat
tuning. But I couldnt find an example server.xml file used in production or
real test results.
So I cant understan
Hello Ali, please find included below a link URL that addresses the JSF
performance issue. A much more rigorous test would be to use the JMeter
distributed testing using the JMeter server. HTH, David.
Ali Ok wrote ..
> Hi,
>
> We are building a web application with JSF. Last day I tested it wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Tony Anecito wrote:
> Actually I just saw some reports on the new quad intel 45nm
> processors and they are much faster than 15msec.
Yes, but the windows timer resolution sucks. :(
> To justify new hardware and predict scalability Capacity Pla
Tony Anecito wrote:
Actually I just saw some reports on the new quad intel
45nm processors and they are much faster than 15msec.
To justify new hardware and predict scalability
Capacity Planning groups have to show the before/after
performance.
I have seen web apps operate in the 4msec range on
Actually I just saw some reports on the new quad intel
45nm processors and they are much faster than 15msec.
To justify new hardware and predict scalability
Capacity Planning groups have to show the before/after
performance.
I have seen web apps operate in the 4msec range on
comercial servlet con
Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi All,
I am using Tomcat 6.0.14 with java 1.6.0_02 on Windows
2000 professional.
I am wondering what is the best parser to use for this
configuration? The one with java 1.6.0_02?
for XML?
the Sun JRE implements the Xerces and Xalan parsers, so it would be the
same as i
Hi Rainer,
Thanks for the well written response and some ideas to
get past the problem.
I agree the 4ms might be latency but until I can
measure at Apache web server or Tomcat more acurately
I will wait to say what it really is.
I am using %D and as you said the timer is not very
accurate. Hopef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
Rainer Jung wrote:
> mod_jk as well as Apache httpd use apr_time_now(). I checked with APR
> 1.2 (httpd 2.2): on Unix/Linux this is gettimeofday().
>
> Even on an old Solaris 8 system, I can easily get microsecond resolution
> out of a C test
in this benchmark of POSIX compliant 2.6
> kernel vs 2.4
>
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-web26/
>
> YMMV!
> Martin--
>
>
>
>
> M--
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tony Anecito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "T
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat performance measurments...
> I would but I have a web site off of the Apache web
> server and I have the port 80 used by it.
>
> -Tony
>
> --- Peter Cr
Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi Rainer,
I am using Windows 2000 professional so I suspect
Tomcat is using an windows api call that is limited to
15msec resolution even though the %d is advertised as
microsecond resolution.
You are right:
http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/archive/2006/02/20/535792.aspx
O
Hi Rainer,
I am using Windows 2000 professional so I suspect
Tomcat is using an windows api call that is limited to
15msec resolution even though the %d is advertised as
microsecond resolution.
The Java jre had this issue then with release 1.5+ Sun
added a nanosecond timer which is what I used fo
Christopher Schultz wrote:
Other factors include the resolution of the timer being used by Apache
and/or mod_jk for emitting log messages. Most people don't care about
high-resolution timing for things like web server logs, so I wouldn't
expect Apache to be using one.
mod_jk as well as Apache h
Hi Chris,
Yes, I am doing my measurements in a controlled
environment. As for measurments I have gone as far as
using a sniffer for looking at the tcp/ip
conversations.
I understand about the timers for Apache but as
hardware and the servlet containers (and jvms) get
faster the old timers become
First: measurement:
Apache access log can use "%D" in the LogFormat, which for Apache httpd
2.0 and 2.2 gives microseconds response time. Obviously the real
resolution depends on the operating system. The 15msec you mentioned is
way to long for a OS timer resultion.
mod_jk provides an apache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Tony Anecito wrote:
> I would but I have a web site off of the Apache web
> server and I have the port 80 used by it.
So? If you're doing performance testing, you should be doing it in a
laboratory environment. You /are/ doing this on a test se
I would but I have a web site off of the Apache web
server and I have the port 80 used by it.
-Tony
--- Peter Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Also, any hints on how to improve Tomcat
> performance
> > appreciated.
>
> Why not do the easy
> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Also, any hints on how to improve Tomcat performance
> appreciated.
Why not do the easy one - get rid of that extra layer of
performance-sapping httpd and mod_jk in the middle instead?
- Peter
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
> security by obscurity, that is.
Through I agree that claiming Apache httpd increases security, it is
certainly not security by obscurity. It is another layer between the
attacker and the goodies. You may disagree about t
doh! load-balancing of course...
I don't know, I'm a stickler for the old "do one thing, do it well",
tomcat rocks at serving dynamic java, apache rocks at being internet
facing serving static & CGI. the jk connector is good & solid, so I'm
happy to keep everything separate and only have tomca
good security is hard.
I've seen state governments using the reverse-proxy layered approach
described below, and that worked extremely well. I've also seen a
federal government with an open database port to the internet (won't say
which! lets just say they're not known for prompt security fixe
security by obscurity, that is.
since the httpd just sends all requests further to the tomcat, if
there is a security relevant bug in tomcat code, it would be accessed
by the remote side either way. Further, are your machines, on which
httpd is running, running under different OS than your tomcat
We use httpd to sit in between firewalls and handle all incoming traffic.
Static content is served from there and dynamic content is proxied through
to the Tomcat server behind another firewall. SSL is only needed from the
client to the httpd server.
The Tomcat server then handles the database ac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt,
Matthew Kerle wrote:
> Apart from integration into a larger site or static content, when would
> you put httpd in front of tomcat?
This might count as "integrating into a larger site", but I use Apache
httpd to front multiple instances of Tomca
On 11/21/06, Andre Prasetya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/21/06, Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PostgreSQL is excellent, IMHO - fast, and easy to administrate.
Yupe agreed, but for database that is used with frequent insert and delete
statement, I have to vacuum them frequently. Which is a
Yupe agreed, but for database that is used with frequent insert and delete
statement, I have to vacuum them frequently. Which is a boring task to do. I
created an agent that will vacuum the database every friday. Then I move it
to MySql because I think its more suited to my needs.
-Andre-
On 11/
2006/11/19, Gaurav Kushwaha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks Martin and Everyone else for the suggestions.
Martin, Oracle I dont want to go with since its expensive. I will infact try
out MySQL and will let you guys know.
I would argue that you chose one of the inferior database management
systems,
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
