| From: pkt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, 10 August, 2007 00:38
|
| One option is that to increase the max thread per process limit of HP
to
| high value, but administrators are not very convinced with this idea
|
| Any pointers on this issue.
Have your admins check out the "Java Out
David Delbecq wrote:
En l'instant précis du 10/08/07 10:34, Rainer Jung s'exprimait en ces
termes:
The question about Tomcat serving no more requests, once you reached
the OS thread limit: if a new request comes in, the listening thread
serves the request and a new thread is taken out of the po
En l'instant précis du 10/08/07 10:34, Rainer Jung s'exprimait en ces
termes:
>
>
> The question about Tomcat serving no more requests, once you reached
> the OS thread limit: if a new request comes in, the listening thread
> serves the request and a new thread is taken out of the pool to do the
>
I would agree, that 65 is a very low thread limit for a J2EE web
container, at least if it will get serious load. Java Enterprise gets
its performance out of concurrency.
Your observation, that you actually run out of threads already proves
you, that you will need more than 65 threads.
So I
Just for information,
we run tomcat on HP-UX with no special tomcat limitation on max thread.
We also use a NIS (aka Yellow pages) based JNDI authentification. We sun
the sun provided NIS context for jndi. This tool is known by us to
create something around 200+ temporary threads to get it's datas
i tried to do that but still the thread count goes beyond 45-50. so i guess
with some more load it will go beyond 65. And yes the figure is total of jvm
and tomcat. But is there any way to restrict this to not exceed 65.
Leon Rosenberg-3 wrote:
>
> you not counting the threads which are used b
you not counting the threads which are used by jvm and tomcat itself,
and those are more than 5.
Try with max threads = 25 and check whether this works at all on your machine.
regards
Leon
On 8/10/07, pkt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> HI All
> I and running tomcat on HPUX machine. The problem
