Not as much unrelated to the topic that my interventoion was - sorry didn't
see it had already been addressed.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Chris Lenart wrote:
> I am using Tomcat 6.0.18 with Eclipse. It says the port is being used.
> Where do I change?
>
>
>
I am using Tomcat 6.0.18 with Eclipse. It says the port is being used.
Where do I change?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Something more to consider relating to specifying charsets in meta tags :
It's of course ok that a server sends http headers specifying in what
charset the page is encoded but when the user comes to saving that web page
on local drive there's nothing left that meta tags to inform browsers the
page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/3/2009 6:43 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> 4) the HTML specs are distinct from the HTTP specs. [...] It also
> seems to be superfluous and confusing considering (1) and (2) above.
> (Like, what if (1) and (4) specify different charsets/encod
Christopher Schultz:
> The problem is when the web server sends a response, it sends it using a
> particular character set (let's just say UTF8 for argument's sake). If
> you also report that the character set is UTF8 in the META tags, then
> it's only valid if the client saves the file to the dis
Hi.
One of my preferred subjects...
1) as per the HTTP specs, the server should send a Content-Type header
along with any response to a browser. If the response is of the general
type "text", then this Content-Type header should also contain a charset
attribute, indicating the character set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oscar,
On 4/2/2009 1:30 PM, Je suis la poubelle wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>> While it's not a terrible idea to specify the encoding in both places,
>> you should consider the possibility that the META tag
Gregor Schneider wrote:
And it's getting really nuts, when it comes to UTF-8: Talking about
UTF-8 with or without BOM? Even the specs are not clear about that.
Actually, a UTF-8 stream should /never/ need a BOM, because there is no
byte-order, UTF-8 being by definition byte-oriented.
The only
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Je suis la poubelle wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
>
> Setting charset/encoding is to specify computerized information. It's
> not just a matter of language. If setting charset in META tag d
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Oscar,
>
> On 3/27/2009 10:35 AM, Je suis la poubelle wrote:
> > 1. In those mentioned web pages, I noticed that none of them explicitly
> > specified t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oscar,
On 3/27/2009 10:35 AM, Je suis la poubelle wrote:
> 1. In those mentioned web pages, I noticed that none of them explicitly
> specified the following HTML header:
>
>
>
That's because setting a META tag that doesn't match reality is not
rea
My few cents...
1. In those mentioned web pages, I noticed that none of them explicitly
specified the following HTML header:
Yes, I understand that the same info is sent in HTTP header, but well,
that's in theory, and everybody knows that what's true in theory isn't
always true in pr
hellokk wrote:
> I have tried with the 5.5.27 version, and I still get the same error.
Take a look at:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/CharacterEncoding#Q4
Mark
>
>
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: hellokk [mailto:kw...@hotmail.com]
>>> Subject: Tomcat 5 and UTF-8
>>>
>>> I have insta
I have tried with the 5.5.27 version, and I still get the same error.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: hellokk [mailto:kw...@hotmail.com]
>> Subject: Tomcat 5 and UTF-8
>>
>> I have installed Tomcat version 5.028
>
> Which hasn't been supported for quite some time. Can you try with a
>
> From: hellokk [mailto:kw...@hotmail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 5 and UTF-8
>
> I have installed Tomcat version 5.028
Which hasn't been supported for quite some time. Can you try with a current
level and see what happens?
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PRO
15 matches
Mail list logo