-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 10/29/2009 4:16 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
> More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing
> a little work in a language that is reasonably "close to the metal"
> gives an insight into how the machine actually works, w
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:30 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Warren Pace wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
>>>> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So
Warren Pace wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
judicious and parcimonious usage of sorted
2009/10/29 Caldarale, Charles R :
>> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
>> That's not even a "modern" stored-program computer!
>
> Just because it used relays as the logic elements?
Hmm. I started writing a response here along the lines of "because it
didn't keep the code in main memory", then
> From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
> [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther
> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
>
> That's not even a "modern" stored-program computer!
Just because it used relays as the logic elements?
It
2009/10/29 Caldarale, Charles R :
> Univac 1004: 961 *6-bit* bytes of core memory, programmed via squids on a
> plugboard. Handled punch cards, paper tape, and printing; tape drive
> optional (we didn't have one). Had a tendency to throw cards all over the
> room if not handled properly.
>
>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
>> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
>>
>> As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
>> judicious and parcimonious us
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
>
> As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
> judicious and parcimonious usage of sorted data structures, on a
> computer with 16 Kb of RAM and punched
I was the happiest man in the world when they delivered our shiny new
System/34. No more punch cards!
--Original Message--
From: André Warnier
To: Tomcat Users List
ReplyTo: Tomcat Users List
ReplyTo: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
Sent: Oct 29, 2009 5:08
Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/10/28 Christopher Schultz :
Everybody ought to learn a little C at some point. It will make you
really appreciate a relatively clean language like Java.
ICL PLAN3 asembler, anyone? :-)
More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing
a little wo
2009/10/28 Christopher Schultz :
> Everybody ought to learn a little C at some point. It will make you
> really appreciate a relatively clean language like Java.
ICL PLAN3 asembler, anyone? :-)
More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing
a little work in a language that
I actually have worked on C but didn't read the line about bit mask. Sorry.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mohit,
>
> On 10/28/2009 2:29 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/28/2009 2:29 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
> the link http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
> it doesn't have option "7"
That's because 7 isn't a
Thanks. I couldn't find what option retry_options 7 in
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html is for.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 28.10.2009 19:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>> Would this work with 1.2.27?
>
> Remove the escalat
On 28.10.2009 19:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Would this work with 1.2.27?
Remove the escalation parameter, I guess that's the only 1.2.28 special
param.
> Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
> the link http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/refe
Thanks a lot!
Would this work with 1.2.27?
Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
the link http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
it doesn't have option "7"
Regarding ping_mode:
What happens when Cping returns error for ping_mode "C"? Does it
On 28.10.2009 17:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Based on what I have seen is that we often get HTTP code 502 and by
> increasing socket timeout those errors disappear. I am not sure why
> that happens.
>
> Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
> ok except the socket ti
Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
ok except the socket timeout piece and I should probably remove that?
Do I not recall Rainer already telling you that ?
-
To unsubscr
Based on what I have seen is that we often get HTTP code 502 and by
increasing socket timeout those errors disappear. I am not sure why
that happens.
Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
ok except the socket timeout piece and I should probably remove that?
Here i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/26/2009 6:40 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Christopher in one of his earlier replies mentioned that we don't have
> failover set. I am not sure why he said that because we have
> worker.list and also we have loadbalancer set in our
> worker.
On 26.10.2009 23:40, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> I read about timeouts but I still have following questions:
>
> 1. From 1.2.28 onwards, if I don't set the ping_mode then the request
> will still be sent to the BE node from workers.list even if that node
> is down?
Forwarding http requests to a node o
I read about timeouts but I still have following questions:
1. From 1.2.28 onwards, if I don't set the ping_mode then the request
will still be sent to the BE node from workers.list even if that node
is down?
2. Does socket_timeout mean how long the socket connection will be
kept open? So it actua
thanks I'll read that and let you know if I have any questions.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 26.10.2009 16:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>>> I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
>>> it's
On 26.10.2009 16:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
>> it's confusing in terms of which one should be used and which ones can
>> be left alone. We currently have following values, do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
> it's confusing in terms of which one should be used and which ones can
> be left alone. We currently have following values,
25 matches
Mail list logo
