and nobody is ever the wiser.
>
> Tim
>
>> Regards,
>> Rob
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> >From: Hassan Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Feb 6, 2007 2:00 PM
>> >To: Tomcat Users List , Rob Bugh
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Bugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:22 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Session Affinity and Session Replication
>
>
> Thanks, for the information. My confusion in part stems from this com
On 2/6/07, Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My confusion in part stems from this comment in the The Apache
Tomcat Connector - Reference Guide,
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
Ah, OK -- perhaps that's JK-specific. As I said, I used mod_proxy_ajp
which has no "wo
t;Sent: Feb 6, 2007 2:00 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List , Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Session Affinity and Session Replication
>
>On 2/6/07, Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All the documentation I've read to date indicates not to use sticky
&g
On 2/6/07, Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All the documentation I've read to date indicates not to use sticky
sessions and session replication together.
Can you cite where you saw that?
I've set up a similar config (using mod_proxy_ajp) with both sticky
sessions and session replication a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob,
Rob Bugh wrote:
> So my question is, if I enable session affinity but not session
> replication, how can I failover a connection without losing the
> session data?
You can't, unless you are using some other mechanism to share that data.
Many
