On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 21:02, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Francis,
>
> On 10/4/2011 2:50 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>> Patch attached. I didn't know Bugzilla would treat patches this
>> way...
>
> Can you give us a link to the bug?
>
https://i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francis,
On 10/4/2011 2:50 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
> Patch attached. I didn't know Bugzilla would treat patches this
> way...
Can you give us a link to the bug?
> I implemented those two interfaces again, since the existing
> abstract class woul
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 20:43, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Francis,
>
> On 10/2/2011 3:57 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE :
>>
>>>
>>> 1. If you want to sub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francis,
On 10/2/2011 3:57 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
>> 2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE :
>
>>
>> 1. If you want to submit it as a patch for Tomcat, you should
>> attach it to a Bugzilla is
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE :
>
> 1. If you want to submit it as a patch for Tomcat, you should attach
> it to a Bugzilla issue.
OK, will do.
> 2. Coding conventions:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html
> 3. ASF software is collec
2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE :
> Hello list,
>
> Given the problems I've had with the RemoteAddrValve, I have decided
> to try my hands at implementing a more sophisticated valve which acts
> more like Apache's allow/deny and which takes netmasks as arguments.
>
> Note, it has been compile tested onl
