Re: Persisting Sessions to Database for Fault-Tolerance

2007-02-23 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nathan, Nathan Hook wrote: > Because we have too and because I'm not a fan. : ) I think Hassan was asking /why/ you are not a fan. I'm sure the community would love to hear why the existing clustering is no good, in an effort to make it better. > I

Re: Persisting Sessions to Database for Fault-Tolerance

2007-02-23 Thread Nathan Hook
Because we have too and because I'm not a fan. : ) Is adding a new session attribute listener that will write a Session to the database and using the combination of PersistentManager with a JDBCStore viable for doing fail over with Tomcat servers? If not, then why not? Thank you for your ti

Re: Persisting Sessions to Database for Fault-Tolerance

2007-02-20 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On 2/20/07, Nathan Hook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The company I am working for is trying to get our application to "Enterprise Strength" and have been working on server failover issues. As of right now I'm not a fan of the current clustering solution that is offered by tomcat Because? --